• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How ill white hairs become a fool and jester”-Do you consider this an adequate response to the character Falstaff as portrayed in Henry IV (ii)

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

C.Keaveny UVD "How ill white hairs become a fool and jester"-Do you consider this an adequate response to the character Falstaff as portrayed in Henry IV (ii) Falstaff was and still is one of Shakespeare's most popular characters, for many reasons. Proof of this can be obtained from the fact that Shakespeare had to write Falstaff his own play, Merry Wives of Windsor, after killing him off in another play. After reading this book and being immediately asked if you agreed with the above statement, you would probably say yes, due to the developments in Falstaff's character towards the end of the play. However, when one re-reads the book with this in mind you would come to a different conclusion. The reasons for this belief are shown below and under this are the reasons why these are not justified. From reading the book it is obvious that Falstaff is a jester of sorts, he is always making serious situations light hearted. For example in Act 1, scene 2, Falstaff is speaking to the Chief Justice and the Chief Justice is trying to reprimand Falstaff but is met with witty comebacks and anything he says is reversed by Falstaff and use for his own good. This is one of Falstaff's qualities that I will discuss later. ...read more.

Middle

The Prince says about Falstaff's servant "And the boy I gave Falstaff: a had him from me Christian, and look if the fat villain have not transformed him ape." This shows how the Prince really feels about Falstaff, and it's a long way from what Falstaff thinks. Despite all of Falstaff's apparent shortcomings, he remained very popular with Elizabethan audiences and is still popular today. This is mainly due to Falstaff's good qualities, which are his intelligence wit and the humour he imparts into the play. His amorality, as opposed to immorality is a key to his popularity as well. This is because he is neither evil but neither does he obey a strict moral code. He doesn't conform to the position he is given, and this earns him the respect of the audience but also the contempt of other characters such as the Chief Justice. His amorality and his lack of care enable the audience to identify with how they would like to have lived their lives and he remains likeable even though he is corrupt. They may have like him also out of pity or feeling sorry for the way he feels he ahs been deceived. Although, as I pointed out above, Falstaff is deceived in his opinion of Hal, but there is plenty of evidence to suggest that he is quite intelligent and not a fool. ...read more.

Conclusion

The final scene achieves great poignancy as Falstaff's continued distastefulness is ended with Hal's cruel blow. This would have been a huge shock for the audience at the time, as they would almost all have been completely wrong footed by the plot, helping to make the play a success. During the final scene, Falstaff tries to redeem himself by coming back with a witty comment but Hal says, "Reply not to me with a fool born jest, Presume not that I am the thing I was". This shows that Hal is tired of Falstaff's wit and that he has 'matured' since when he was a friend with Falstaff and that he wants nothing more to do with him. In conclusion we can see that Falstaff is in some ways an old fool and jester, but this is not the whole picture. His character dictates that he will always be a figure of wit and source of humour therefore some of the jester is justified. He is a fool, only in his perception of his friendship with Hal, and this is in part due to his arrogance. His age is a more difficult point as he argues that he is ageless, yet he admits to Doll "I am old, I am old". Falstaff's character is a very complex and intriguing one, and he still remains popular with audiences today. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Henry V section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Henry V essays

  1. Comparison of Olivier (1944) and Branagh's (1989) screen adaptations of Henry V

    Examples of such a theory appear closely after in the next shot (Olivier's) of a rotary camera pan revealing the evolution of his men's spirits as well as a gradual zoom out towards the perspective camera (an effect resembling the camera as the audience so in turn on the zoom in we will be drawn in and inspirited.)

  2. The Subplot: Consider the significance of the subplot and examine Shakespeare's dramatic use of ...

    We see the characters that are involved in the sub plot, as cowardly and pathetic men who will do anything to remove themselves from danger. This is shown in Act Two Scene One when there is threat of a fight between Bardolf Pistol and Nym, yet none of them have the courage to take the first strike.

  1. In the tradition of aesthetics, Oscar Wilde said, “There is no such thing as ...

    The preface was written by Widle after the novel was published. In it he explains that he wrote the novel for the sake of writing a beautiful novel. He explains his opinions on aesthetics, "art for arts sake.....". There I think it implies he did not mean to write an immoral book.

  2. The opening few lines of scene two introduce Falstaff who immediately exemplifies his comic ...

    Conversely, we see a contrast to this 'gentlemanly' image at other points in the passage which demonstrate the deeply multifaceted dimensions contained within Falstaff's character. He asks his page at the beginning of the passage 'what says the doctor to my water', which seems a slightly strange if not taboo opening question.

  1. Why do critics consider Falstaff in The Merry Wives of Windsor to be inferior ...

    According to Bradley, the few sentences in the play that were worthy of the real Falstaff might be written down on a single sheet of notepaper (see Bradley's essay, "The Rejection of Falstaff," in Oxford Lectures on Poetry, 1909, p.

  2. Media Comparative Essay: Concerning the 2 well known film versions of Shakespeare's Henry V ...

    The aura-like light of the moon alters to the subdominant sun, which naturalistically causes the mists to rise. Branagh's transition is aimed relatively at the depictions of a medieval warfare atmosphere. The transition from night into day climbs to the opening of dialogue in the following scene portraying the negative

  1. Account For The Popularity Of The Figure Of Falstaff On Shakespeare's Stage

    The prince convenes with Falstaff and his other friends; if you can call them that, down at the local tavern. The prince does not perhaps think of them as his friends, more as acquaintances because he needs an escape from the reality of being the son of a king.

  2. Explore how Shakespeare creates humour for the audience in the scenes in which the ...

    like walking "by the Counter-gate" which is as hateful to him as "the reek of a lime kiln". He continues to approach Mistress Page professing his love for her and asking for her help to "creep" into the buck-basket, an uproarious to anyone, the thought of Falstaff creeping anywhere!

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work