• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Luhrmann and Zeffirelli use very opposite effects and techniques in each of the Romeo + Juliet films. The contrasts between the Zeffirelli 1968 and the Luhrmann 1997 versions are vast.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Comparison coursework Luhrmann and Zeffirelli use very opposite effects and techniques in each of the Romeo + Juliet films. The contrasts between the Zeffirelli 1968 and the Luhrmann 1997 versions are vast. Even though the directors of each film use different effects and techniques. They both tell the story in their own unique way. Zeffirelli's traditional, English, authentic piece of almost theatre with basic use of lighting, camera and sound. Luhrmann's modern, loud, and emotional gripping piece of film uses a vast variety of lighting, camera and sound to emphasise the piece to the max. Luhrmann's is certainly far more powerful than Zeffirelli's in all aspects. Its use of music creates tension, joy, and emotion. The camera and lighting creates another and I certainly prefer Luhrmann's to Zeffirelli's. The opening scenes of each both include the famous dialogue: "Two families, both alike in dignity. In Fair Verona where we lay our scene..." Luhrmann's repeats the dialogue twice first using a TV news reporter and then using a modern and powerful approach using text to emphasise the meaning of the dialogue fully. The view of Verona and the "Montague" and "Capulet" skyscrapers, determine the rivalry is down to Business empires of the two families. On the other hand, in Zeffirelli's version it uses just the slow, patient narration and has some traditional middle-age music with the long shot camera shot of Verona. ...read more.

Middle

At the start of the scene in the Luhrmann version we see the first of our families, the Montagues. They seem like typical American youngsters having fun in their car with the music turned up. They pull into a gas station and all seems well until the second family arrives, the Capulets. They seem more suave, they are smart looking Latinos, and they seem serious compared to the fun loving colourful Montagues. This is a good way of showing the differences between the two families. However in the Zefferelli version we see the Montagues and Capulets enter a traditional market square similar to one in the original play. We don't see many differences between the two families as they enter the scene. They seem kind of the same type of family, the only thing keeping them different is the colours of their clothes. The Capulets wearing black and blue and the Montagues wearing yellow and red, the clothes have been made to portray what people wore in the time the play was written, men in tights, frills and Robin Hood like hats. In the Luhrmann version the dress is close to modern day attire, Hawaiian shirts and tuxedos. In the first scene in the Luhrmann version there is not much reference to the original script, with little speech being used, but it is accurate to the original script. ...read more.

Conclusion

There is unintentional humour, as the Zefferelli characters seem strange to us modern day people because the men are wearing tights and frocks, the Luhrmann characters seem "cool" because we are used to the attire. But Zefferelli is trying as close as he can to the original play. If Zefferelli had tried to set his film in his time then I expect we would have seen white men with afros, high heels and flares. If we were studying that type of version at school then I expect we would also see them as strange. There is one more difference between the two versions. At the end of the scene where the Prince says that if the two families fight again there will be deaths. Zefferelli has portrayed the Prince riding in on a horse, and we know that princes were around in the time that the play was written, then he speaks to the families. However in Luhrmann's version, he has used the modern day equivalent of a prince, a police general, this is good because there are no princes in modern day cities so Luhrmann has used the next best thing, a modern day equivalent of a prince. If Shakespeare was alive today I think he would have been impressed by Luhrman's attempt to modernize his story, as he has done this very intelligently and very well. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Romeo & Juliet section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Romeo & Juliet essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Romeo and Juliet comparison

    3 star(s)

    In the first scene Act1 scene1 of Zefirelli's takes place in a court yard which has cobbled flooring and large brick walls surrounding it giving the feeling to an audience that it is a small town perhaps even village like image and that this would have been an average day for the people of Verona.

  2. How did Shakespeare create tension in act 1 scene 5 of Romeo and Juliet

    audience can see they are made for each other by how they talk and how they carry on the conversation in poetry "ROMEO: Have not saints lips, and holy palmers too? JULIET: Ay, pilgrim, lips that they must use in prayer.

  1. Explore how Baz Luhrmann, the director of "Romeo and Juliet", has produced an exciting ...

    back them up, they change their mind after answering "no" to Abra and say "yes" that they did bite their thumb at him. To which Abra get very angry and him and Tybalt draw their guns simultaneously the Montague's too draw out their guns.

  2. Rome And Juliet (Comparison Of the two films)

    The rooftops of houses, church spires and a river are seen clearly. You are able to feel the quietness of the city in the early morning, which again gives the effect of the city being very calm and peaceful. The camera pans round the whole city, and then moves up

  1. Explore Luhrmann's interpretation of the opening scene of 'Romeo and Juliet' and attempt some ...

    Zeffirelli felt that their youthfulness and inexperience works beautifully in the more passionate sequences. The styles of both versions of 'Romeo and Juliet' are in some ways dissimilar. Zeffirelli's style is very conformist, classical as well as peaceful. He wants the audience to listen carefully to the words of the prologue and wanted his version to be indisputable.

  2. Compare the opening scenes of the two 'Romeo and Juliet' films.

    were still images to introduce the characters with their names and relation to Romeo or Juliet pending on which family they belonged to. There were also lots of close-ups of characters and ground shots, which gave a real western theme to the film; there were also close-ups of different signs

  1. Romeo and Juliet - film versions.

    Baz Luhrmann made one change to the characters in his film. He took Abraham from the Montague's and put him on the Capulet's side. He also changed his name to Abra. This may have been because Abraham was quite a vicious character and would therefore fit better in the Capulet side.

  2. Comment on how Baz Luhrmann uses video and audio techniques to communicate themes and ...

    The "+" in blood red symbolising bloodshed and conflict, it is also shaped like a cross, to continue the religious theme of the film. The words are white upon black, illustrating good and evil. Here the music changes and a bouncier, more funky, modern tune kicks in as "the boys" come on to the screen.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work