• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Luhrmann and Zeffirelli use very opposite effects and techniques in each of the Romeo + Juliet films. The contrasts between the Zeffirelli 1968 and the Luhrmann 1997 versions are vast.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Comparison coursework Luhrmann and Zeffirelli use very opposite effects and techniques in each of the Romeo + Juliet films. The contrasts between the Zeffirelli 1968 and the Luhrmann 1997 versions are vast. Even though the directors of each film use different effects and techniques. They both tell the story in their own unique way. Zeffirelli's traditional, English, authentic piece of almost theatre with basic use of lighting, camera and sound. Luhrmann's modern, loud, and emotional gripping piece of film uses a vast variety of lighting, camera and sound to emphasise the piece to the max. Luhrmann's is certainly far more powerful than Zeffirelli's in all aspects. Its use of music creates tension, joy, and emotion. The camera and lighting creates another and I certainly prefer Luhrmann's to Zeffirelli's. The opening scenes of each both include the famous dialogue: "Two families, both alike in dignity. In Fair Verona where we lay our scene..." Luhrmann's repeats the dialogue twice first using a TV news reporter and then using a modern and powerful approach using text to emphasise the meaning of the dialogue fully. The view of Verona and the "Montague" and "Capulet" skyscrapers, determine the rivalry is down to Business empires of the two families. On the other hand, in Zeffirelli's version it uses just the slow, patient narration and has some traditional middle-age music with the long shot camera shot of Verona. ...read more.

Middle

At the start of the scene in the Luhrmann version we see the first of our families, the Montagues. They seem like typical American youngsters having fun in their car with the music turned up. They pull into a gas station and all seems well until the second family arrives, the Capulets. They seem more suave, they are smart looking Latinos, and they seem serious compared to the fun loving colourful Montagues. This is a good way of showing the differences between the two families. However in the Zefferelli version we see the Montagues and Capulets enter a traditional market square similar to one in the original play. We don't see many differences between the two families as they enter the scene. They seem kind of the same type of family, the only thing keeping them different is the colours of their clothes. The Capulets wearing black and blue and the Montagues wearing yellow and red, the clothes have been made to portray what people wore in the time the play was written, men in tights, frills and Robin Hood like hats. In the Luhrmann version the dress is close to modern day attire, Hawaiian shirts and tuxedos. In the first scene in the Luhrmann version there is not much reference to the original script, with little speech being used, but it is accurate to the original script. ...read more.

Conclusion

There is unintentional humour, as the Zefferelli characters seem strange to us modern day people because the men are wearing tights and frocks, the Luhrmann characters seem "cool" because we are used to the attire. But Zefferelli is trying as close as he can to the original play. If Zefferelli had tried to set his film in his time then I expect we would have seen white men with afros, high heels and flares. If we were studying that type of version at school then I expect we would also see them as strange. There is one more difference between the two versions. At the end of the scene where the Prince says that if the two families fight again there will be deaths. Zefferelli has portrayed the Prince riding in on a horse, and we know that princes were around in the time that the play was written, then he speaks to the families. However in Luhrmann's version, he has used the modern day equivalent of a prince, a police general, this is good because there are no princes in modern day cities so Luhrmann has used the next best thing, a modern day equivalent of a prince. If Shakespeare was alive today I think he would have been impressed by Luhrman's attempt to modernize his story, as he has done this very intelligently and very well. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Romeo & Juliet section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Romeo & Juliet essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Romeo and Juliet comparison

    3 star(s)

    crowded in around them and the audience can observe there reactions to see (if they don't understand what is happening) what the Shakespearean words are supposed to be telling the audience).This helps when the Capulet's start to talk about the Montague's.

  2. How did Shakespeare create tension in act 1 scene 5 of Romeo and Juliet

    Immediately after Romeo asks what is her mother and a nurse replies Juliet's mother is "the lady of the house." (act 1 scene 5)this also adds to the tension in the play. Romeo and Juliet falling in love is a problem because they don't know each others backgrounds but the

  1. Explore Luhrmann's interpretation of the opening scene of 'Romeo and Juliet' and attempt some ...

    Luhrmann modernises 'Romeo and Juliet'. This contrast to the Zeffirelli's version, which is Elizabethan and intended for a more grown up and mature audience. Luhrmann directs the opening scene in a very original and advanced way, different from Zeffirelli's version. The setting of the two films are contrasting.

  2. Comment on how Baz Luhrmann uses video and audio techniques to communicate themes and ...

    Here the camera turns moving across to another pump as an expensive looking blue car pulls calmly in to the station. Blue suggesting coldness and the slow speed suggests that the driver is not excitable like the Montague boys but serious.

  1. Compare And Contrast The Presentation Of Two Film Versions Of The Prologue To Romeo ...

    dispute between the two families, used to alert citizens when danger is coming. These subtle but effective shots cause the spectators to endure all sentiments the film, making the movie as pragmatic as possible; perchance causing affiliates of the audience to consider the film to be a true story and not just a work of magnificence fiction.

  2. What techniques does Baz Luhrman the director of the 1997 film "Romeo ...

    Also the Capulet boys have a cross shaved on the back of their heads . This shows that both Capulet and Montague boys are religious. Luhrman uses a variety of techniques. One of them is the role of media, he uses this very effectively.

  1. Romeo and Juliet - own version

    As he states to his friend, Benvolio, "She'll not be hit/With Cupid's arrow. She hath Dian's wit, /and, in strong proof of chastity well armed ..." He goes on to admit: "She hath foresworn to love; and in that vow do I live dead that live to tell it now."

  2. Compare the opening scenes of the two 'Romeo and Juliet' films.

    were still images to introduce the characters with their names and relation to Romeo or Juliet pending on which family they belonged to. There were also lots of close-ups of characters and ground shots, which gave a real western theme to the film; there were also close-ups of different signs

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work