• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month


Extracts from this document...


PURITY AND CIVILITY Both in "The Praise of Folly" by Desiderius Erasmus and "Of Cannibals" by Michel de Montaigne-relating to the common point to which attention is tried to be drawn-inquiry of true civility with regards to the Nature and its necessity according to certain circumstances are substantiated. First of all,Erasmus stating "Truly,to destroy the illusion is to upset the whole play.The masks and costumes are precisely what hold the eyes of the spectators." Aspires to put forward the idea that there is a definite pact between people-which can be rather called as a concious illusion-on wearing veils of wisdom,called roles just as if they were performing a play.Under these veils,probably lies something much more different than what is seen on the stage;a virtuous man may be a wretched being or a king may be a beggar in fact. Just like this case,in "Of Cannibals",Michel de Montaigne implies ironically by the statement: "All this is not too bad-but what's the use?They don't wear breeches." That although costumes or breeches,which are taken as a token for civility,may turn out to be just the opposite.They are veils under which true identities and intentions are concealed.However,then the question what makes a person sensible-in other words both natural and spontaneous in manners is aroused.Montaigne ...read more.


aspires for wisdom and for the sake of it he spoils the purity of the Nature.No artifice is capable of of matching to the beauty and the originality of the Nature itself.All efforts to imitate the Nature and by this way to gain wisdom are bound to end in failure - in other words they are imperfect. "All things,says Plato,are produced by nature,by fortune,or by art;the greatest and most beautiful by one or the other of the first two,the least and most imperfect by the last." Hence,the motto that wisdom - artifices as the by-products of it - only renders man to get away from Nature,which in addition alienates him to humanly feelings but makes him a selfish and destructive being is argued in both "Of Cannibals" and "The Praise of Folly". "Therefore,just asamong mortals those men who seek wisdom are furthest from happiness - indeed,they are fools twice over because,forgetting the human condition to which they were born,they aspire to the life of the immortal gods and wage war against Nature with the engines of learning - so too,the least miserable among men are those who come closest to the level of intelligence (that is,the folly) ...read more.


called a madman,whose only guilt is waking the people from their illusion?What he causes will only create an uneasiness among the majority - as although what he says is true,he defies to run with the herd;therefore he is to be called a madman.Everyone is supposed to overlook the faults in order to perform the play of life remaining content with it. Yet,the essay "Of Cannibals" makes a contrast with this opinion to a some extent as the natives in the newly discovered land do not have neither any social norms nor any social institutions.They live simply,not distorted with any kind of artifice,although they live as uncivilized people - which is called by the modern man with respect to the rules of reason and manners - they never offend their origin,which is the Nature and perhaps live more civilly than modern man with regards to their purity. In conclusion,it is to be confessed that costumes or roles of the man do not necesssarily signify one's civility and purity.They are only veils that are sometimes worn on purpose,sometimes by obligation.What is to be seen as purity of intentions and happiness is the closeness to the Nature and keeping away from evil deeds to gain too much wisdom,which only bring misery to human life. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Fyodor Dostoevsky section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Fyodor Dostoevsky essays

  1. Theory Of Knowledge.

    How could you expect a citizen of France and a citizen of Germany to sit down calmly and discuss and rationalize the causes of the war or the justness of the armistice and the Treaty of Versailles without being subjective and reach conclusions based on plain facts instead of their own nationalism?

  2. Equiano, the Free Man.

    This is by far one of the most important aspects to Equiano's writing in countless ways. To point out a few, at first look, this inclusion demonstrates to the readers how important it was to Equaino to gain his freedom in an honest and documented way.

  1. The Cycle of the 'Fuck It' Attitude: Both Constructive and Destructive.

    Just like Tupac, everyone demands respect and when they do not get that they will retaliate in some way or form. In Tupac's case they retaliated by taking his life. No, it does not seem like an equal trade off, but if Tupac did not care, why should anyone else.

  2. The 3 common misconceptions - signs of the manipulative consciousness.

    In my case, it has caused me to be a strong perfectionist, which causes me to create very high standards and expectations for completion of my tasks. It has also granted me very fierce senses of ambition, pride, confidence, and other minor details, which I've used to manifest a strong amount of individuality within myself.

  1. The Abolition of The Abolition of Man

    He states that now a schoolboy who reads this passage will forever, unknowingly, associate ones feelings about another object with that persons own feelings. In the future, if presented with a situation such as a man complimenting the appearance of another person, the schoolboy would be lead to believe that the man was referring to himself.

  2. As the number zero was the start of mathematics and the vacuum the foundation ...

    in front of Birdsong, the cheating white man with the comic name, who is eventually unmasked and killed by a fool. Rider, the traditional character of pantaloon who has ranted and raved throughout the story, true to his role, has adapted to the absurdity of life itself.

  1. How does the writer of the play 'A Kind of Alaska' show the struggle ...

    The dog keeps turning about ... I talk French" Deborah still has no confirmed idea of who she is. Pieces of information is spilling out of her mouth, slotting her past back together. She is struggling to find out who she is but the memories she is sharing with Hornby are helping her find herself.

  2. How is the LuLing that springs to life in her manuscript different from the ...

    From an early age, LuLing developed a superstitious idea about this curse that has been haunting her mother's side of the family. Since people in China at the time were great believers in curses like this one and ghosts and so on it must have been very easy for LuLing to believe in this.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work