• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What do we learn of Salem and three of its inhabitants in the opening part of the text? (Act One)

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐What do we learn of Salem and three of its inhabitants in the opening part of the text? (Act One) ?The Crucible? sets the scene in seventeenth century Massachusetts, presenting Salem as the area inhabited by the Puritans, where Salem is established as a full theocracy, with religion in the forefront of the inhabitants? daily lives. In particular, a few of the inhabitants of this isolated town highlight the problematic society that exists within the Salem community. The overture of the text presents Salem as a place engulfed by extreme Puritanism, with the text suggesting that even the whole ?European world the whole province (Salem) was a barbaric frontier inhabited by a sect of fanatics?, and this extreme turn of religion into a fully-fledged theocracy seems to be the case as the overture continues to describe how the town itself had ?no novelists ? and would not have permitted anyone to read?. The text explains how this is the case due to the fact that this extreme form of religion is imposed on every inhabitant, where not one single person would be able to experience any kind of ?vain enjoyment?, even further suggesting that they ?did not celebrate Christmas?. We learn that Salem?s governance by extreme religion means that even ?a holiday from work meant that they must only concentrate?on prayer?. ...read more.

Middle

Parris? own background is noted as him previously being a merchant, a character interested in self-profit, clearly not suited for being a religious leader, with Proctor continuing to describe Parris as ?hardly ever [mentioning] God anymore? in his preaching. His selfishness also becomes evident as he begins bickering about his supply of firewood, where he argues that his ?contract provides?all?firewood? for his household, and yet he has apparently been ?waiting since November for a stick?, and has been reduced to a ?London beggar? by doing so. Notably the comparison to a ?London beggar? which he makes of himself goes against the nature of Puritanism and Christianity itself, and clearly Parris becomes an increasingly contradictory character. This is further continued in the conversation when Proctor points out that he is ?the first ever minister (that) ever did demand the deed to this house?, against the tradition of the community. This land-lust is also a highlight of the emerging breakdown in Salem?s community, where self-profit and motivation begin to emerge into the centre-stage. Another of the first individuals to be presented in the text, Abigail is quickly established as a character of deceit and lies, with ?an endless capacity for dissembling?. This skill is quickly shown within the first lines of speech in the act as Parris? demands that he ?must know? what sort of actions Abigail committed when Parris discovered her in the forest dancing. ...read more.

Conclusion

Proctor is notably described as having the ability to expose flaws in others, as well as stand up for his own rights, demonstrated in his conversation with Putnam as he rightfully states that he ?bought that tract from Goody Nurse?s husband?, and that Putnam?s grandfather ?had a habit of willing land that never belonged to him?. His ability to expose the inherent flaws in the society leads him to build upon the idea that Salem?s community is one built on a vestige of lies and descending into mass hysteria; he states to the Reverend Hale that he has heard that Hale is a ?sensible man? and maybe he would ?leave some of it (sensibility) in Salem?. The Salem in the time of the text is presented as an isolated village, rooted deep in Puritanism with the community supposedly unified as one ?from top to bottom? on the basis of religion. However, we quickly learn that this is not the case as the society that exists in Salem during the beginning of the text has already had its disciplines put to the test, only to end in failure, demonstrated by the by-products of this drastic failure in the form of Abigail, Proctor and the Reverend Parris himself, all of which who contradictorily push against the very rules and traditions of Puritanism: breaking the commandments, encouraging witchcraft, use of false accusations, hypocrisy, and the overwhelming self-interest which the text suggests will only leave destruction in its path, namely the mass hysteria of the witch hunt. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Arthur Miller section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Arthur Miller essays

  1. Willy's image of America is a mistaken one.

    His name was never in the paper. He's not the finest character that ever lived." Here we can see Linda in Act 1 defending Willy, but she is also highlighting that Willy is an ordinary man and he is nothing 'special'. Therefore, he has nothing extraordinary that will enable him to stand out of the crowd and be noticed.

  2. How does Arthur Miller present The character of Reverend Hale in 'The Crucible'.

    He starts to realize that these simple men and woman could not perform and sort any sort of witchcraft. Firstly, we see a somewhat different Hale in Act 3 than the earlier Acts. Even though he is an official of the court, it is like, he is defending those who are accused of witchcraft.

  1. Write about the character of Danforth and his exercise of his judicial powers in ...

    They saw themselves as good and thought that they were defending the community from evil by weeding out evil witches. However, they persecuted and destroyed good people with no hard evidence. In my opinion this makes them the evil ones.

  2. How is Abigail presented in 'The Crucible'

    problem which was in the people as some of them liked to pretend and perhaps Abigail didn't like this type of behaviour so she lived her life as she pleased. She is an orphan who must support herself but Abigail Williams has a sense of supremacy over people in Salem

  1. Act 4 of The Crucible provides a powerfully dramatic conclusion to the play. ...

    Act four significantly identifies the religious paranoia that existed within the town of Salem - A strict Christian community, fearful of anything to do with evil. Any sinner, whom doesn't beg for forgiveness and remain in the love of Jesus, is seen as an outcast.

  2. 'Whilst we are appalled by Abigail Williams, we are fascinated by her as well'. ...

    This reaches its climax within Act 3, whereupon Abigail even manages to gain some form of control over the judge Danforth himself; it is Danforth who ultimately resides over the fates of those accused by her, and yet her oratory strength and position within society is suddenly empowered to such

  1. Explore Millers presentation of Proctor in The Crucible. How far do you agree with ...

    "My wife will never die for me!" The fact that Proctor is so self motivated tells the audience that deep inside, he will do anything for his wife, proving to us that he is a true husband and man. John Proctor thinks that Abigail and the girls were just pretending about compacting with the Devil.

  2. The Crucible Revision Notes

    All conflict resolutions need these type of people 3. Has Proctor?s respect 4. A love and understanding of children; her mere presence calms Betty Parris; something her father could not do 5. Victim of her accusers ? the Putnams ? of long held jealousies; charged with the murder of Ann Putnam?s babies; she is the Devil?s temptress.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work