• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The treaty of Versailles was shaped by French determination to exact revenge and to ensure Germanys permanent weakness How far do you agree with this view?

Extracts from this document...


'The treaty of Versailles was shaped by French determination to exact revenge and to ensure Germanys permanent weakness' How far do you agree with this view? World war one, one of the most destructive wars the world has ever faced, famous for trench warfare and along with it the unrelenting bombardment of the battlefields tearing countries and countless soldiers apart- this was in clearly a recipe for destruction. Inevitably, France, being the epicentre of the war along the western front, was ruined ruined; cities, towns, farms were destroyed in their thousands! From this, clearly France would be beyond hostile towards Germany as they were left with a destroyed landscape, and an unbelievably high death toll- understandably revenge was in just about every sane Frenchman's sights, especially when they saw a virtually untouched Germany. Was the treaty of Versailles shaped by French determination to exact revenge and to ensure Germanys permanent weakness? Or rather was it far more liberal than what the French wanted as the other nations in the big 3 had more input into the final draft of the treaty? ...read more.


Furthermore George was quoted saying 'squeeze them until the pips squeak' showing how he wanted utmost revenge and would try get as much out of Germany as possible, however the difference between the two was that Lloyd George wanted to destroy Germany 'within reason' whilst Clemenceau probably would've cast Germany back into the stone age if such was possible. However the reason why Britain didn't have such an extremist side as France was that Germany was seen as a valuable trading partner at the time (and Keynes, a brilliant economist of the time explained that by crippling the German economy it would thus cripple all of Europe's great economies leading to great depression- this stuck fear into Lloyd George and thus why he was more hesitant to cripple Germany than Clemenceau was). Furthermore Britain did not want to see France become the most powerful nation in Europe and lastly and most importantly it was France where the war effort did the most destruction so Britain wasn't effected nearly as much. Finally America, under Wilson was by far the most liberal of the three nations. ...read more.


intervene immediately, however this also backfired as both America and Britain both refused to sign the pact and America couldn't be seen to be signing secret treaties, and thus Britain wouldn't sign if America didn't! France was clearly left feeling hard done by, and although the treaty did provide them with lots of Clemenceau's aims, the French public felt what the treaty enforced was far too lenient, thus choosing to kick Clemenceau out of power showing how harsh thy treaty needed to be in their eyes- even thought they managed to crush Germany economically and monetarily they wanted to crush Germany further. In conclusion I feel that France did attempt to 'exact revenge and to ensure Germanys permanent weakness,' however it didn't not manage to shape the treaty to the extent it wanted, hence why Clemenceau was taken as a scapegoat and was evicted from power. I feel that Britain, being somewhat of the middle man managed to largely shape the treaty being able to pick and choose what they thought was best from American and French aims whilst adding points to their benefit. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Hitlers Germany

    The Nazis started this movement in their "Strength Through Joy" campaigns, but it has continued in the republic on a much greater scale. The philosophy of the free market was developed further by the CDU coalition than by the dominant political parties of any other country.

  2. Versailles Treaty- evaluation of sources

    Ferguson goes on to exclaim that self determination in effect was more of an advantage and in the future it did give Germany more reason to expand which led to conflict. His judgement is valid as seen in the case of Sudetenland where over three million Germans resided and Hitler used this as a reason to take that area.

  1. The Treaty of Versailles: Prelude to WWII

    limited to 100,000 men; conscription and much prided submarines and aircraft (the allies thought that without an air force Germany couldn't ever go to war8) were to be banned; the navy was limited to six battleships (no Dreadnought's); and the Rhineland was to become a demilitarized- zone.

  2. Why did the Franco-Prussian war happen and why were the Prussians able to defeat ...

    asks William I to agree never to renew the candidature of a Prussian on the Spanish throne, William rejects this and believes it threatens his honour. This in my opinion begins to light the fuse of the Franco-Prussian war because before this event French and Prussian relations were becoming more

  1. Assess the short-term significance of the Treaty of Versailles.

    However, the middle class, who were relatively comfortable before the Crash, lost their savings as the banks collapsed. Consequently, a new larger lower working class was created, one perfect for Hitler to corrupt. Combine these two factors, as a result of the economic clauses of the Treaty of Versailles and the document becomes very significant.

  2. The Treaty of Versailles was mainly intended as a punishment to cripple and humiliate ...

    Germany had always been striving for a bigger and more powerful country. In the years leading up to the war they had become strong with a Navy almost beating Britain?s respected and cherished fleet, a growing army and an empire they had always strived for.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work