• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Account for the political defeat of Trotsky

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Marcos Akstein The History of the Soviet Union 1917 - 1991 10/03/04 Account for the political defeat of Trotsky Lenin's death on January 21st 1924 triggered what is widely called the struggle for leadership or succession inside the Soviet Union. A political vacuum had been created after Lenin's death and the struggle to fill in this vacuum was fought mainly between two main contestants; on one side of the ring we had Comrade Trotsky; commander and chief of the Red Army during the Russian Civil War, brilliant leader, speaker and writer, too name a few qualities among many. On the other side; regarded by most historians, at first, as the underdog of this battle for succession- Comrade Stalin; 'a man who did not match Trotsky's brilliance'1 and a grey blur, a man without no personal distinction.2 All the bets were therefore being placed on Trotsky, the most able man in the current leadership and, to some extent, the most obvious choice. To corroborate with previous statement, historian Chris Ward, in his book Stalin's Russia, point's out that many foreign observers believed that it was Trotsky who was the obvious successor to Lenin. However, in some ways quite similar to a boxing match, when the final bell rang on the 12th round it was Comrade Stalin who was declared victorious. ...read more.

Middle

That basically meant that the Testament wouldn't affect the struggle by any means (This blatantly pictures Trotsky's absence of political infighting as he could have used Lenin's testament to throw Stalin out of the competition) Trotsky, on the other hand, was viewed in a slightly more favorable way. Although Lenin still accentuated Comrade's Trotsky's deficiencies, the other leading players believed that Trotsky was the main threat among them and must be dealt with. Lenin goes on to describe Trotsky as 'arrogant and incapable of getting along with people'.6 This is evident at the time of Lenin's death. Instead of rushing at once to Moscow, as Stalin did, he idled away his time at a southern spa where he had gone in order to cure an indisposition'.7 This clearly exposes the lack of political timing on Trotsky's behalf and accentuates the determination of the Stalin to associate himself as close as possible to Lenin when he stood at the funeral posing as Lenin's true heir. The characteristic's displayed above play great influence in determining the fate of the power vacuum left by Lenin, as observed in several situations. The first situation explored by Stalin and completely ignored by Trotsky was the formation of the famous triumvirate (Stalin, Kamenev and Zinoviev). ...read more.

Conclusion

never reached Soviet leadership because sooner or later he would have been thrown out of the competition and would have been brought down by a democratic process. Unfortunately for Trotsky this was not the case and Stalin walked calmly in the direction of future heir. Also, because Trotsky was such a firm believer of the party, it would have been considered a heresy if Trotsky verbally expressed his dissent against the party's structure. Therefore, in a sense, it is plausible that Trotsky's complaint's and allegation's against Comrade Stalin was severely restricted due to this fact. 1 Von Laue, T. Why Lenin? Why Stalin? A Reappraisal of the Russian Revolution, 1900-1930 J.B. Lippincott Company 1971 pg. 187 2 Fitzpatrick, S. The Russian Revolution Oxford University Press 1982 pg. 99 3 Ulam, A. A History of the Soviet Union New York Praeger 1976 pg. 61 4 Fitzpatrick, S. The Russian Revolution Oxford University Press 1982 pg. 99 5 Ibid 6 Kenez, P. A History of the Soviet Union from Beginning to End Cambridge University Press 1999 pg. 76 7 Von Laue, T. Why Lenin? Why Stalin? A Reappraisal of the Russian Revolution, 1900-1930 J.B. Lippincott Company 1971 pg. 189 8 McCauley, M. The Soviet Union since 1917 Longman 1981 pg. 55 9 Ibid 10 Ibid 11 Fitzpatrick, S. The Russian Revolution Oxford University Press 1982 pg. 99 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Stalin and Trotsky

    Also, the book is closed symbolizing closure of an individuals' independence. The fact that the title "Dreams" is written reversed and backwards on the book represents a shift in government and a shift in an individual's role within the society.

  2. How Did Trotsky Contribute To

    Trotsky's influence in the Bolsheviks successful take over of the provisional government was obvious and there for all to see. Upon his success in the overthrow of the provisional government, he was also promoted by Lenin and as a result played a part in the Russo-German negotiations at Brest-Litovsk.

  1. Stalin Vs. Trotsky.

    Soon, however, he became converted to Marxism, engaged in revolutionary activity, and for it spent his eighteenth birthday in jail. He was exiled to Siberia but soon escaped and arrived in London in 1902 to join Lenin. In Western Europe he met another young lady.

  2. The enormous role that Trotsky played in the success of the Bolsheviks up until ...

    yet another reason why people backed Stalin, they realised there would be jobs for them if he came to power.

  1. "To what extent was French defeat at the battle of Waterloo due to Napoleons ...

    who believe that blame could be apportioned to his subordinates for their poor performance. Even if you take the view that individual commanders should take responsibilities for their own actions, would Napoleon have commanded the troops any better? The part of the battle he did command personally was in no way decisive.

  2. Compare the characters and beliefs of Lenin and Stalin.

    In a way we have enough information of who and what things they separately did wrong along their lives, as politicians and leaders of Russia. If more important means who had the better impact, it is to say that both Lenin and Stalin were prepared to see millions of Russians suffer and die for their ideals.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work