• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Australia does not follow a “tradition of impulsive involvement in international conflict regardless of the nation’s state of preparedness”.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

My hypothesis is that Australia does not follow a "tradition of impulsive involvement in international conflict regardless of the nation's state of preparedness". Australia had extremely close ties with Britain and felt a duty to the "mother land" which it fulfilled twice following the out break of two major conflicts. It was bound by foreign policy to enter WW1and WW2 and to fight to defend the empire. In our next major conflict, Vietnam, Australia gave support to America due to our eagerness for them to stop the spread of communism. In all involvements Australia's military earnt a fine reputation, and until Vietnam, enjoyed considerable support from home. Australia's military manpower at the time was not strong, but when WW1 began people rushed to enlist and go on an adventure. It has been recorded that Australia prepared for only six weeks for the expected outbreak of WW1, however this is not true. Australia began planning and preparing for the out break of war (expected to start in 1915), in June 1911, after a conference in London. The Australian Prime Minister, Andrew Fisher, gave an assurance that an Australian expeditionary force would be ready to fight with Britain in the opening battles of the war. ...read more.

Middle

Australia was badly prepared for the out break of another world war. It is for this reason that the Australian government of the day increased the defence budget by 62.5 million pounds ($128 million), a huge amount at the time. The RAAF, (Royal Australian Air Force), suffered much the same problem. They were equipped with old planes from WW1, and badly needed new, more advanced planes. On a brighter note the RAN, (Royal Australian Navy), was well funded and outfitted. The militia forces, men who joined and went straight to the front were under trained and under equipped. The Australian regular infantry were well trained, and consequently had many victories over Italy and Japan. Capturing 1,000's of useable weapons and vehicles along with taking 100,000's of prisoners. Leading into WW1 and right through to the start of WW2 Australia did not have a foreign policy distinct from that of the imperial government in London. Basically Australia's foreign policy was the same as Britain's. Our foreign policy was composed mostly in London under British supervision. Australia also did most of our military exercises and operations with Britain. When the Labour Party came to power in the 1940's, Australia's foreign policy was changed. ...read more.

Conclusion

and a deep hatred of Germany developed. They wanted to fight and, although physical standards were very high, over 50 000 men enlisted very quickly - some coming hundreds of miles, walking or riding. When the conscription vote was taken the citizens voted no. The realisation that it was not a game or an adventure and people were killed, changed the public's attitude to war. Yet many men still enlisted to fight for their country and the "mother land". At the start of WW2 the people agreed that they should fight to help Britain and stop Germany for the second time. Much support was given to the war effort and many of the local merchant ships were converted to help transport troops to and from battle. As the war progressed more and more support was given - after hearing about the victories over Italy, Germany and eventually Japan. The nation was ready for the conflicts in Europe and with Japan. Each time the Australian's fought valiantly and were labelled heroes. In Australia the people gave support and did a fine job in producing all the equipment and necessities needed for the war effort and consequently our nation played a significant role in the Allied war effort in every conflict they took part in. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Many peoples have contributed to the development of the United States of America, a ...

    The federal government upheld the principle of racial segregation in the U.S. Supreme Court case PLESSY V. FERGUSON (1896), as long as blacks were provided with "separate but equal" facilities. In the face of the rigidly segregated society that confronted them, blacks themselves were divided concerning the appropriate course of action.

  2. In both world wars, many enemy aliens were interned in Australia

    However the Great War changed this temperament quite markedly. Dutton8 argues that the Australian attitude towards Europeans turned from moderate welcoming to outright hostility, he goes on to state that it was the Commonwealth in its policies that created this environment of nationalist hatred and jingoistic fervour.

  1. American Involvement in Vietnam.

    Later on the targets also included Towns and cities all over Vietnam and targets throughout ht the Ho Chi Minh trail. Positive affects 1. Damaged the supply routes, therefore slowing the enemy down. 2. Reduced Ground force casualties by striking from the air.

  2. What Were The Significant Factors That Led To America's Involvement In the Spanish-American War?

    Many authors, such as Ivan Musicant4 and Frank Friedel5, believe the Yellow Press and their extraordinary stories pushed the American public to their limits, forcing the McKinley administration to finally intervene in Cuba. However, writers such as Wayne Morgan suggested that the United States pursued a peaceful policy toward Cuba,

  1. The Arab-Israeli conflict.

    As well as being a governmental organisation it was set-up without endorsement. As immigration rose the Arabs also rose in revolt and a guerrilla war broke out, but when the Arabs attacked, the British defeated them and were then discharged, but the Zionist groups were allowed to keep their armaments.

  2. "Keep the dogs hungry, they will follow you". Such was in essence, the ruling ...

    Not a single paper was printed in the country. All political life was prohibited and the prisons were full. Sultan Said was surrounded by official slaves in his palace at Salalah, where time was marked in Pavlovian fashion by a bell which rang every four hours.

  1. The British Security Coordination and Canadian Involvement in Clandestine Activities

    would go on to drop agents behind enemy lines virtually all over the world to help recruit and train resistance to, as Churchill stated, "set Europe ablaze". With the possibility of a ground force being landed in Western Europe to open up a second front growing slimmer into 1940, the

  2. Australia's involvement in the Second World War

    General MacArthur was welcomed by the Curtin government and the Australian people. The Curtin government had previously agreed to General MacArthur's appointment as the Supreme Commander of all Allied Forces in the South West Pacific. With America's help, Australia became a base for the combined American-Australian counter-offensive against Japanese forces.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work