• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Australia does not follow a “tradition of impulsive involvement in international conflict regardless of the nation’s state of preparedness”.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

My hypothesis is that Australia does not follow a "tradition of impulsive involvement in international conflict regardless of the nation's state of preparedness". Australia had extremely close ties with Britain and felt a duty to the "mother land" which it fulfilled twice following the out break of two major conflicts. It was bound by foreign policy to enter WW1and WW2 and to fight to defend the empire. In our next major conflict, Vietnam, Australia gave support to America due to our eagerness for them to stop the spread of communism. In all involvements Australia's military earnt a fine reputation, and until Vietnam, enjoyed considerable support from home. Australia's military manpower at the time was not strong, but when WW1 began people rushed to enlist and go on an adventure. It has been recorded that Australia prepared for only six weeks for the expected outbreak of WW1, however this is not true. Australia began planning and preparing for the out break of war (expected to start in 1915), in June 1911, after a conference in London. The Australian Prime Minister, Andrew Fisher, gave an assurance that an Australian expeditionary force would be ready to fight with Britain in the opening battles of the war. ...read more.

Middle

Australia was badly prepared for the out break of another world war. It is for this reason that the Australian government of the day increased the defence budget by 62.5 million pounds ($128 million), a huge amount at the time. The RAAF, (Royal Australian Air Force), suffered much the same problem. They were equipped with old planes from WW1, and badly needed new, more advanced planes. On a brighter note the RAN, (Royal Australian Navy), was well funded and outfitted. The militia forces, men who joined and went straight to the front were under trained and under equipped. The Australian regular infantry were well trained, and consequently had many victories over Italy and Japan. Capturing 1,000's of useable weapons and vehicles along with taking 100,000's of prisoners. Leading into WW1 and right through to the start of WW2 Australia did not have a foreign policy distinct from that of the imperial government in London. Basically Australia's foreign policy was the same as Britain's. Our foreign policy was composed mostly in London under British supervision. Australia also did most of our military exercises and operations with Britain. When the Labour Party came to power in the 1940's, Australia's foreign policy was changed. ...read more.

Conclusion

and a deep hatred of Germany developed. They wanted to fight and, although physical standards were very high, over 50 000 men enlisted very quickly - some coming hundreds of miles, walking or riding. When the conscription vote was taken the citizens voted no. The realisation that it was not a game or an adventure and people were killed, changed the public's attitude to war. Yet many men still enlisted to fight for their country and the "mother land". At the start of WW2 the people agreed that they should fight to help Britain and stop Germany for the second time. Much support was given to the war effort and many of the local merchant ships were converted to help transport troops to and from battle. As the war progressed more and more support was given - after hearing about the victories over Italy, Germany and eventually Japan. The nation was ready for the conflicts in Europe and with Japan. Each time the Australian's fought valiantly and were labelled heroes. In Australia the people gave support and did a fine job in producing all the equipment and necessities needed for the war effort and consequently our nation played a significant role in the Allied war effort in every conflict they took part in. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. To what extent were germany to blame for the outbreak of ww1

    However the main argument to suggest war was not fully Germany's fault was that Germany was not the only country involved in the decision making of war, meaning she alone could not be responsible for the consequences.

  2. "Keep the dogs hungry, they will follow you". Such was in essence, the ruling ...

    A few weeks earlier, most observers in the Persian Gulf and Beirut thought the fall of Sultan Said was only a matter of time: "When the oil revenues reach �50 million ($120 million) the British will remove him and put a Tariq in power", said one well-placed source in Abu Dhabi last June.

  1. Many peoples have contributed to the development of the United States of America, a ...

    Yankees, who by now had migrated in great numbers into the Midwest, leaned strongly toward the Whigs. Many southerners admired Yankee ways and tended to vote for Whig candidates, too. Democrats continued to condemn banks and tariffs as sources of corruption and exploitation, and in Jefferson's tradition insisted on cultural laissez-faire, the freedom of people to live as they desired.

  2. In both world wars, many enemy aliens were interned in Australia

    This is the rationale as to why naturalisation could not alter the 'call of the blood'. Dutton alludes to the premise that these measures were taken as a measure of National Security or as he describes it, "...obsessed by the danger of subversion, and determined to employ the full extent

  1. The British Security Coordination and Canadian Involvement in Clandestine Activities

    would go on to drop agents behind enemy lines virtually all over the world to help recruit and train resistance to, as Churchill stated, "set Europe ablaze". With the possibility of a ground force being landed in Western Europe to open up a second front growing slimmer into 1940, the

  2. Australia's involvement in the Second World War

    Curtin offered General MacArthur control of Australia's natural resources and armed forces. The 'aid' was very much in America's self-interest; however the growing threat from Japan and failure of British support, Australia had little choice other than to adhere with America's military plans and strategy.

  1. The popular myth of the battle of Britain quickly emerged during the early part ...

    The third interpritation is an extract from The last Enemy by Richard Hillaryin 1942. The extract was written about two years after the Battle of Britain, and the main point seems to be to emphasize the role of the pilots in triumphing over the evil of the nazis.

  2. Nationalism in Australia.

    The threat of peace was aroused by the sudden preparation of armies and navies. This was militarism. Having the existing armies and navies ready for war was the leaders believed a path to the countries protection and safeguards to ensure peace.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work