• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Comparing and contrasting the practices and strategies utilized in the Korean and Vietnam wars

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Joseph Hagan 7 June 2004 HOTA Pd.1 Mr. Munro Comparing and contrasting the practices and strategies utilized in the Korean and Vietnam wars Two of the greatest battles which were fought by similar foes were those of the Korean and Vietnamese wars. Both conflicts involved a "communist" and "capitalist" participant(s) which had their own ideals and reasons for why to include themselves into such conflicts. There are also other similarities other than the opponents in these wars, such as the military tactics and strategies which were effectuated during this time. In both cases, the U.S. intervened forcefully introducing large masses of militia and using a considerable amount of armament, yet on the other hand, their enemies were supported by their allies throughout the duration of both conflicts and succeeded militarily against the democratic forces. To start off with, during the Korean War, North Korea invaded the southern sector of the country without any warning. Similarly, the Vietcong started a revolution in Vietnam by trying to take over all of the country without addressing the issue publicly. ...read more.

Middle

had similar results, such being the case with "Rolling Thunder" and "search and destroy" tactics during the Vietnam war and the attack on North Korea after having taken the 38th parallel during the Korean War. In the Korean affair, the U.S. attack seemed to have worked by obtaining control over South Korea and then trying to take control over North Korea as well, yet this-as mentioned before-failed since the Chinese overran all of Korea. During the Vietnam conflict, the U.S. also utilized similar tactics as in the Korean war in the sense that both "Rolling Thunder" and the "search and destroy" tactics failed in terms of conserving the peace in Vietnam. "Rolling Thunder" would have (theoretically) effective if it were not interrupted and "search and destroy" tactics would have also been effectual if the western troops would have not left the territories which they obtained after every attack. As Ambassador Maxwell Taylor mentioned in 1964, "The ability of the Viet Cong continuously to rebuild their units was one of the mysteries of this guerrilla war," referring to the fact that the Vietcong would simply regroup after an American attack and reestablish a military outpost in the sector which was wiped out-since the western forces would simply leave after having attacked. ...read more.

Conclusion

hand, the Vietnamese were even harder to localize, since they could easily camouflage themselves (everyone's clothing was similar, there were absolutely no differences). This is why the western troops had to take chances while eliminating civilians which might have been Vietcong. But in terms of policies and tactics on that level, the Vietnamese also differed from the Koreans in the sense that most of the South Vietnamese utilized "strategic hamlet" in order to round up people who might be opposers to the regime. By doing this, any uprisings were stopped and effectively neutralized. Both the Korean and the Vietnamese wars had several things in common in terms of the practices and strategies used during these conflicts as well as some aspects which were distinct. The two communist foes in the wars developed guerrilla type warfare and utilized it in a very effective matter against their enemy which lead to even more pressure from both sides of the conflict. Both L.B. Johnson and Nixon said "I'm not going to be the first President to lose a war," showing an example of the extreme opposition which the Americans encountered in the Asian wars. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Korean propaganda during the Second World War and the Korean War had a different ...

    Socially, propaganda also affected Korea because of the division in classes. Therefore, propaganda from the Second World War affected civilians in the way that the middle and lower classes were united in hate towards the Japanese, and the exception of the higher class, creating a category within themselves.

  2. North Korea and South Korea after the Korean war.

    In reaction the Bush administration stopped oil and other supply shipments to North Korea for its defiance. The North then suspended the UN inspectors who where watching the nuclear program.25 Possibly in retaliation, President Bush in 2002 did damage relations with Korea and inter-Korea relations during his January 29th 2002 state of the union address.

  1. The Korean war and the conflict between North and South.

    Also, industries became nationalized. By the end of 1946 the Soviet Union had ended preparations of it's "sovietization" of North Korea.8 North Korea then needed to hold general elections to consolidate Il-Sung's position in North Korea.

  2. Today’s Star Wars

    Russia has 5,000 aging nuclear missiles (The Progressive,8) that are on a hair trigger. By provoking them into keeping their scattered, decrepit arsenal active, we run the risk of accidental launch or thievery by rogue states. It could also threaten the Nunn-Lugar program, in which the US aids Russia in securing its alarmingly scattered arsenal.

  1. A Study of Air Supremacy in the Korean War.

    The F-80 Shooting Star was quickly becoming outdated and there were not enough modern jet fighters, such as the F-86 Sabres, to effectively carry the fight to the enemy. Essentially, it was Air Material Command (AMC), headquartered at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base that served as the primary logistics support organization.

  2. Arab-Israeli Wars.

    was a pan-Arabist leader,a friend of Soviet Union,It was the firestarter of struggles against Israel. There were waves of raids organized by Palestinian groupings from Gaza Strip and West Bank against Israel.Nasse created a tripartite military pact among Egypt,Syria and Jordan.

  1. World war ll one of the most deadliest and destructive wars.

    In Libya the British were able to split the army under Rommel, forcing him to retreat. Early in the morning of December seventh, 1941 a fleet of 189 Japanese aircraft began attacking Pearl Harbor, Hawaii. The first wave of planes destroyed anything it could find, including American aircraft, battleships, destroyers, cruisers, and submarines.

  2. To what extent did guerrilla tactics of the Vietcong enable them to achieve victory?

    French whose experience was based on methods employed during World War l and ll. Giap's next phase was the move to set piece battles as his army grew in strength. The Vietminh received a great boost both practically and in terms of morale when Mao Zedong took control of China

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work