• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Comparing and contrasting the practices and strategies utilized in the Korean and Vietnam wars

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Joseph Hagan 7 June 2004 HOTA Pd.1 Mr. Munro Comparing and contrasting the practices and strategies utilized in the Korean and Vietnam wars Two of the greatest battles which were fought by similar foes were those of the Korean and Vietnamese wars. Both conflicts involved a "communist" and "capitalist" participant(s) which had their own ideals and reasons for why to include themselves into such conflicts. There are also other similarities other than the opponents in these wars, such as the military tactics and strategies which were effectuated during this time. In both cases, the U.S. intervened forcefully introducing large masses of militia and using a considerable amount of armament, yet on the other hand, their enemies were supported by their allies throughout the duration of both conflicts and succeeded militarily against the democratic forces. To start off with, during the Korean War, North Korea invaded the southern sector of the country without any warning. Similarly, the Vietcong started a revolution in Vietnam by trying to take over all of the country without addressing the issue publicly. ...read more.

Middle

had similar results, such being the case with "Rolling Thunder" and "search and destroy" tactics during the Vietnam war and the attack on North Korea after having taken the 38th parallel during the Korean War. In the Korean affair, the U.S. attack seemed to have worked by obtaining control over South Korea and then trying to take control over North Korea as well, yet this-as mentioned before-failed since the Chinese overran all of Korea. During the Vietnam conflict, the U.S. also utilized similar tactics as in the Korean war in the sense that both "Rolling Thunder" and the "search and destroy" tactics failed in terms of conserving the peace in Vietnam. "Rolling Thunder" would have (theoretically) effective if it were not interrupted and "search and destroy" tactics would have also been effectual if the western troops would have not left the territories which they obtained after every attack. As Ambassador Maxwell Taylor mentioned in 1964, "The ability of the Viet Cong continuously to rebuild their units was one of the mysteries of this guerrilla war," referring to the fact that the Vietcong would simply regroup after an American attack and reestablish a military outpost in the sector which was wiped out-since the western forces would simply leave after having attacked. ...read more.

Conclusion

hand, the Vietnamese were even harder to localize, since they could easily camouflage themselves (everyone's clothing was similar, there were absolutely no differences). This is why the western troops had to take chances while eliminating civilians which might have been Vietcong. But in terms of policies and tactics on that level, the Vietnamese also differed from the Koreans in the sense that most of the South Vietnamese utilized "strategic hamlet" in order to round up people who might be opposers to the regime. By doing this, any uprisings were stopped and effectively neutralized. Both the Korean and the Vietnamese wars had several things in common in terms of the practices and strategies used during these conflicts as well as some aspects which were distinct. The two communist foes in the wars developed guerrilla type warfare and utilized it in a very effective matter against their enemy which lead to even more pressure from both sides of the conflict. Both L.B. Johnson and Nixon said "I'm not going to be the first President to lose a war," showing an example of the extreme opposition which the Americans encountered in the Asian wars. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. North Korea and South Korea after the Korean war.

    Presidents Bush's statement also sparked anti-American protest throughout South Korea.26 Despite protest Bush visited Seoul and did not back down from his little nickname he gave the North. Although, it was not popular, when asked about Bush's comment President Kim Dae-Jung did defend Bush saying "In my view, I believe that the U.S.

  2. The Korean war and the conflict between North and South.

    As an anti- trusteeship movement was slowly gaining ground in South Korea the US military government became caught in the middle. 1946 and 47 was a chaotic time for both Koreas. Kim-Il-Sung supported by the Russians became the chairman of the communist party in North Korea and would eventually become leader of South Korea.

  1. A Study of Air Supremacy in the Korean War.

    it's high-speed maneuverability for dog fighting.7 The depot also performed refurbishment on aircraft after they crossed the ocean on ships from the United States. Almost all aircraft suffered from salt corrosion, including those shipped via naval aircraft carriers. When planes were unloaded at the docks they were immediately brought to Tachikawa to get them ready for entering the war.

  2. Arab-Israeli Wars.

    Iasrael believed its was waging a defensive war,Arabs were becoming belligerent.So she decided to launch the Sinai campaign,to reach Suez Canal,to destroy Egyptian Army in the Sinai and to capture Sharm el Sheikh,the point at the southern tip of

  1. World war ll one of the most deadliest and destructive wars.

    Although many countries declared war against the Axis nations, only the United States, Brazil, and Mexico actually sent troops to fight. At this point the war started to turn in favor of the Allies. The first major win for the American forces was at the Battle of the Coral Sea.

  2. Korean propaganda during the Second World War and the Korean War had a different ...

    facing at the particular time: a big increase in population, and an inadequate supply of raw resources such as minerals, agricultural land, and forestry. During these illegal invasions and occupations, Japan readily chose to utilize the strength of their army.

  1. To what extent did guerrilla tactics of the Vietcong enable them to achieve victory?

    French whose experience was based on methods employed during World War l and ll. Giap's next phase was the move to set piece battles as his army grew in strength. The Vietminh received a great boost both practically and in terms of morale when Mao Zedong took control of China

  2. Was it the technological or tactical changes which had the greater influence in determining ...

    This lasted until 1530 with the arrival of a new form of defence system. As soon as the power of artillery was shown, engineers set about developing new defences to withstand siege cannon. This ultimately led to the concept of the trace italienne, and the effectiveness of these defences led

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work