• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Describe the conditions that rule a war a "Just War".

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Essay on War a) Describe the conditions that rule a war a "Just War". In the 13th century a Christian monk named Thomas Aquinas drew up some conditions that could be used to make a decision about whether a war is just or not. First Aquinas laid down three conditions and these were later added to. The first three conditions were conditions that could be decided quite easily but one needs the war to have finished before the decision can be made. The first condition states: "The war must be started and controlled by the authority of the state or ruler." This condition has a yes/no answer and this can make the decision easier. The war is either controlled or not. The authority of state is usually a government, elected or not, so one assumes they can control the war. There is nothing to say that because it is being controlled it is right. The controller may want a war and so will not object is the war becomes advanced and once it does the controller may loose control. The second of the three conditions states: "There must be a just cause; those attacked must deserve it." This condition also has a yes/no answer; there is a just cause or there is not. This can make the decision easier though different people may think different things. ...read more.

Middle

This is difficult to decide. The second states: "There must be 'proportionality' in the way the war is fought." Proportionality is where no civilians are killed and only enough force is used in order to gain victory. This is difficult as accidents happen and the war may fulfil all the other criteria but because some civilians were killed the war may be declared unjust. This one leaves it up to the person making the decision to what they think is more important. Some believe no civilians should be killed where as others believe that some may get killed as it is war. The third states: "The good gained by the victory must be greater than the evil which led to the war." This condition requires the war to have ended before a decision can be taken. Evil and good is very difficult to weigh up and so this condition may not make it any easier for a decision to be made. b) Why do some Christians believe that fighting a war can never be right? A pacifist is someone who believes that all war is wrong and who would refuse to participate in any fighting. Among Christian denominations the Quakers are the group most associated with pacifism. Christians look to The Ten Commandments and see that they say, "Do not murder". ...read more.

Conclusion

Anger can lead to the need for revenge and a lot of the wars in history have started because people have wanted revenge on countries or individuals, today's situation in America is an example of this. In Matthew 5:38-48 Jesus talks about revenge and love of enemies. In this Jesus went beyond the strict letter of the Old Testament law and many priests felt uneasy about applying 'an eye for an eye' literally, preferring it relating to compensation and not injury. Jesus based the command on Leviticus 19:18 "love one another....". Hating the enemy was not part of a Christian teaching but was a common human failing. Jesus goes further than this and tells us to love offenders and that this power should make them good. This relates to America as George Bush is taking out revenge on Afghanistan though Jesus says not to do this. Jesus believes we should leave punishment up to God and also we should love the offenders as this may make them good. The final teaching I base my decision on can be found in Leviticus. "Do not take revenge on anyone or continue to hate him, but love your neighbour as you love yourself." (Leviticus 19:18). Here Jesus shows that you should forgive people and not continue to hate them. This can lead to war and Jesus preventing this can prevent war and this is what convinces me that Jesus was a pacifist. Louise Blacklock 10V3 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Total War, Britain during the Second World War

    Rationing had shown that government intervention could be effective. Beforehand some politicians had stated that it was impossible to improve the health of the nation; rationing changed it almost overnight. In addition the government provided dietary supplements fore the first time, such as orange juice and cod liver oil.

  2. American History.

    Still, some Indians responded [initially women, but men too after 1799 when a Seneca named Handsome Lake had visions and preached that Indians should redistribute their work for survival, but not give up their culture].

  1. While surfing the channels on TV you might hear a lot of news about ...

    So, as we see these two countries face together against the Arabian world. The whole stuff had been started after the World War II. In Europe something terrible had happened with Hitler and his anti-Jewish laws, which spread soon from Germany to Middle-East Europe.

  2. Dismantling Violence in Mozambique.

    They exchanged information about where to find goods, where to avoid travel, how to address the soldiers, where to sleep at night, when to flee their homes, which group is planning a raid on their village, etc. The people who survived to tell their stories were not only exchanging experiences but also they were exchanging strategies of survival.

  1. Vietnam War.

    It was further agreed to partition the country temporarily along the 17th parallel, with the north going to the Communists and the south placed under the control of the Saigon government. The agreement stipulated that elections for reunification of the country would be held in 1956.

  2. Post-Cold War Realities

    However, regardless of its unmatched strength, there is only so much that one country can do to ?contain? regional powers. This fact has not been lost on either Iran or Russia. Both seek to further the notion of a multipolar world and in doing so have found common interests.

  1. Was the public misled about conditions in the Trenches?

    The main reason for them only letting them write a certain amount was to keep up the moral of the British public. Q5. As I already know sources F and G do match because as it already says they have the same publishing dates and they have both been published by the same people, the British Government.

  2. The Prelude to the 1975 War and the Cairo Agreement.

    Rifai selected the controversial Ghanim as his minister of defence; all other cabinet ministers except one were also military officers. Franjieh's motives were difficult to discern. Some believed his move was part of a plot to cement Maronite dominance of the government.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work