• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

European History - Unilateralism and Multilateralism.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Colin Hewko Period 4 AP European History Mr. McGonigal Unilateralism is defined as a tendency of nations to conduct their foreign affairs individualistically, characterized by minimal consultation and involvement with other nations, even their allies. Multilateralism is defined as involving more than two nations or parties. In a well written article in "Imprimus" magazine, Charles Krauthammer writes about whether modern day America should use unilateralism or multilateralism. Krauthammer comes up with the conclusion that modern day America should use unilateralism. I agree that the United States should conduct their foreign affairs without involving other countries. The U.S. should use unilateralism simply because it is able to use unilateralism. As the author states, the U.S. displayed just how powerful it actually is when it rebounded from the September 11th attacks, and destroyed the fanatical regime in Afghanistan. ...read more.

Middle

The fact that the U.S. has more power than any other country just adds more reason that America should do what is best for itself without worrying about the reactions of other countries. On top of that, since our country is a superpower, just by asserting a position, others will follow. The U.S. should oppose multilateralism because multilaterlism is a cover for inaction. During the Clinton administration, when the country was at rest with foreign affairs, numerous, useless treaties were made to prevent future wars from occuring. Currently, our country is not in a state of action. There is a war on terror between terrorists and the United States. The United States can't sit around and try to make every other country happy while terrorists plan more attacks on our nation. ...read more.

Conclusion

Our country does not need to dictate everything, just issues that are highly important to our country, such as missile defense. Our country should be guided by our own independent judgement. The feelings of other countries should be placed fairly low on the United States' priority list when it comes to important issues. It's hard to disagree with someone on an issue when they take a stance that is fairly in the middle of the road. By mixing both sides of the argument, a person cannot be wrong. This is exactly what Krauthammer does in this article. While he favors unilateralism, he still argues for points of multilateralism. Overall, Krauthammer thinks our country should use unilaterism at the current time. I agree that, at the moment, and with important issues, the United States should conduct their foreign affairs without involving other countries. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. History of the United States

    But with the westward thrust of the American nation, all attempts at compromise were thwarted, and diverging economic, political, and philosophical interests became more apparent. The resulting civil war transformed the American nation. Political Fragmentation In 1854 the KANSAS-NEBRASKA ACT threw open the huge unorganized lands of the Louisiana Purchase to popular sovereignty, repealing the Missouri Compromise line of 1820.

  2. Forrest Gump; the Modern Day Fairytale

    I could not help but love Forrest for his character traits. He is blissfully ignorant and unaware yet he experiences more than most people in his lifetime. It is this factor which makes his character so appealing to people, against the apparent odds he was successful.

  1. American History.

    It was a success, which led to a call for a general meeting of the states in Annapolis in September 1786 to discuss trade policies. Only 5 delegations ended up coming, but they issued a call for another convention in Philadelphia.

  2. Battle Analysis - Dong Ap Bia (Hamburger Hill).

    has the advantage in availability of supplies and transportation. Much of the command that took place during the beginning of the battle was lead by Lieutenant Colonel Honeycutt, commander of the 3d battalion, 187th Infantry. Battle command was decidedly decentralized.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work