• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

European History - Unilateralism and Multilateralism.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Colin Hewko Period 4 AP European History Mr. McGonigal Unilateralism is defined as a tendency of nations to conduct their foreign affairs individualistically, characterized by minimal consultation and involvement with other nations, even their allies. Multilateralism is defined as involving more than two nations or parties. In a well written article in "Imprimus" magazine, Charles Krauthammer writes about whether modern day America should use unilateralism or multilateralism. Krauthammer comes up with the conclusion that modern day America should use unilateralism. I agree that the United States should conduct their foreign affairs without involving other countries. The U.S. should use unilateralism simply because it is able to use unilateralism. As the author states, the U.S. displayed just how powerful it actually is when it rebounded from the September 11th attacks, and destroyed the fanatical regime in Afghanistan. ...read more.

Middle

The fact that the U.S. has more power than any other country just adds more reason that America should do what is best for itself without worrying about the reactions of other countries. On top of that, since our country is a superpower, just by asserting a position, others will follow. The U.S. should oppose multilateralism because multilaterlism is a cover for inaction. During the Clinton administration, when the country was at rest with foreign affairs, numerous, useless treaties were made to prevent future wars from occuring. Currently, our country is not in a state of action. There is a war on terror between terrorists and the United States. The United States can't sit around and try to make every other country happy while terrorists plan more attacks on our nation. ...read more.

Conclusion

Our country does not need to dictate everything, just issues that are highly important to our country, such as missile defense. Our country should be guided by our own independent judgement. The feelings of other countries should be placed fairly low on the United States' priority list when it comes to important issues. It's hard to disagree with someone on an issue when they take a stance that is fairly in the middle of the road. By mixing both sides of the argument, a person cannot be wrong. This is exactly what Krauthammer does in this article. While he favors unilateralism, he still argues for points of multilateralism. Overall, Krauthammer thinks our country should use unilaterism at the current time. I agree that, at the moment, and with important issues, the United States should conduct their foreign affairs without involving other countries. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Forrest Gump; the Modern Day Fairytale

    The pensive expression upon Forrest's face tells us that he is finally come to terms with his inner conflict, thus he announces that he is ready to return home. The astonishment shows on the faces around him, this does not deter him in any way though!

  2. American History.

    to be equal representation (2 senators, but they would vote as individuals, not as a block). - On the whole, congressional powers were more limited than in the VP but more flexible than in the NJP. The executive was given primary responsibility for foreign affairs and was designated the commander-in-chief of the armed forces.

  1. History of the United States

    The Constitutional Convention of 1787 A chain of meetings, beginning with one between Virginia and Maryland in 1786 to solve mutual commercial problems and including the larger ANNAPOLIS CONVENTION later that year, led to the CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTION in Philadelphia in 1787.

  2. Battle Analysis - Dong Ap Bia (Hamburger Hill).

    The Americans had numerical strength in both troops and key weapon systems. The U.S. had ARA5, Artillery, and Navy jets to support the ground assault. F-4 phantoms and F-105s would drop napalm and cluster bombs on the mountain to destroy the enemy bunkers and foliage of the jungle.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work