Part of The Student Room Group

  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Examine the main factors which led British governments to follow a policy of 'appeasement' in the period of 1931-1938.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Britain and Appeasement, 1931-1939 Examine the main factors which led British governments to follow a policy of 'appeasement' in the period of 1931-1938. There are many reasons why Britain followed a policy of appeasement during 1931-38, but one of the main reasons is Britain wanted to avoid going to war. After World War I the British public were shocked about such things like trench warfare, the Battle of the Somme (thousands of men lost their lives for a few miles of land) and as soldiers back then were encouraged to train, join and fight with friends, many villages lost their young men. Politicians such as Neville Chamberlain and Stanley Baldwin had witnessed the Great War and had lost relatives close to them and weren't willing to go through the same experience again. Also we know that public opinion was against war because in 1933, the Oxford University voted that it would not fight for King and Country. Also in 1935, the Peace Pledge Union held a nationwide poll to determine what was the public view on disarmament and 92.5% of the people said that they favoured disarmament. ...read more.

Middle

Also Hitler's attacks on German communists had won him strong support inside and outside Germany as well. Also many people and politicians thought that if Germany prospered then the Russian Communists weren't likely to come further into Europe and some had a few that if Britain left Germany alone so they could 'control' East European countries which prevented the expansion of communism. Also many people in Britain were unaware of what was going on in Nazi Germany and were more concerned with the Russians, so they were ready to turn a blind eye to Germany's aggressiveness. Also Bolshevik Russia propaganda was aimed at inciting revolts in capitalist countries and hopefully turning them communist. The Russians were the ultimate threat to the British although Russia had been had ally of Britain's in the First World War. Even if Britain had decided to turn to the Russia, the Russians couldn't have helped that much because she was isolationist and Stalin was concentrating on industrial development. This 'industrial development' involved killing lots of innocent civilians and many soldiers from the army, which caused the Russians army to be weak. ...read more.

Conclusion

Chamberlain believed in active appeasement and as he was Chancellor of the Exchequer (1931-1937) and so he knew what a war could do financially to Britain. He was also the Primeminister, from 1937-1940, and he believed in the reasonableness of all men and was on a mission to secure European Peace. Appeasement was also supported by Lord Halifax (Foreign Secretary), Sir Samuel Hoare (Home Secretary), Sir John Simon (Chancellor of the Exchequer) and also the Conservative Party. The Cliveden Set supported appeasement, and one of its members Lord Astor, owned the times, which was a very popular paper and therefore influenced the way the public viewed appeasement. All of these government officials supported the policy of appeasement, backed by the majority of the public and therefore Chamberlain probably thought he would have to try his utmost to avoid war with Germany. All of these different factors such as buying time to build up the military, to not having a repeat of the First World War left no doubt in the minds of British people, that it would be logical to support appeasement. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

or


Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Lion Led By Donkeys

    The majority of the public believed that the British soldiers were lions, but donkeys led them and that the Generals were stupid who could not think of ideas to win the war apart from the slaughtering men until one side was ground into submission.

  2. The Prelude to the 1975 War and the Cairo Agreement.

    On May 9 1983, an order issued by Fateh's Colonel Sa'id Musa Muragha (Abu Musa) called upon all Fateh units in the Bekaa to disregard future orders from the Fateh leadership. At first, the Fateh Central Committee belittled the disobedience but later, when some 2,000 of the 10,000 guerrillas that

  1. Reasons for the increasing support given to NSDAP by the German people in the ...

    The remaining decisive, 50% he gained after 1933 mainly through his achievements." The renewed sense of national outrage and desperation caused by the French takeover of the Ruhr and hyperinflation in 1923 provided Hitler with an opportunity to lift the NSDAP's public profile.

  2. Assess the view that Chamberlain's main aim in following a policy of appeasement in ...

    looked to another American banker Young who suggested that Germany pay only 1/4 of the total reparations amount and on a sliding scale until 1988, however by 1931 it was decided to suspend reparations payments and that time only an 1/8 of the total amount was paid.

  1. THE TREATY OF VERSAILLES

    SOURCE A Atomic bombs could not destroy the Red Army. The Russian defence to atomic attack is easy to spot. They occupy countries in Europe with infantry and tanks and defy us to drop atomic bombs on Poland, Czechoslovakia, Hungary etc.

  2. Was Chamberlain's policy of Appeasement the best policy to follow in 1938?

    If Britain had have gone to war with Germany straight away they would have had a problem. Their strength was in the navy and Germany did not have a wide border with coast and was far inland. France had put all their money into the Maginot line, which was purely

  1. What was "appeasement"?

    Counter Revisionists too had plenty of hindsight. They looked at the views of previous historians, and often made judgements based on those thoughts. They had the opportunity to read declassified information. "Chamberlain's willingness to negotiate with Hitler was thus more than a result of a sense of military weakness and a refusal to regard the German minority in Czechoslovakia as worth fighting over .

  2. What factors have prompted democratisation in Argentina?

    He did this by having his Interior Minister, General Albano Eduardo Harguindeguy meet with senior members of the UCR7, the Radical party, as well as relatively minor members of the PJ8, the Per�nists. The problem was that the military leaders were concerned with the issue of presidential succession, and this division caused the talks to become less and less relevant.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work