• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain how the Schlieffen Plan was meant to work.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Explain how the Schlieffen Plan was meant to work. When war was declared in August 1914, Germany was allied in "The Triple Alliance" with the Austro - Hungarian Empire and Italy. Britain, Russia and France were allied as "The Triple Entente." The alliance between Britain, France and Russia rendered Germany's geographical position a weakness, with France and Britain on it's Western Frontier, and Russia in the East. This meant that Germany would have to split its army into two, in order to fight the war on both fronts - which was an immense quandary. The Schlieffen plan was devised by the German Chief of Staff, Count Alfred Von Schlieffen in 1905 as a solution to this dilemma. Count Von Schlieffen appreciated that due to its vast area, Russia would take more than six weeks after the declaration of war to immobilise its troops. On the basis of this, Von Schlieffen deduced that if the German army defeated France's army within six weeks, they could move onto the eastern front. The could then defeat the Russian army, with the entire German army, and prevent splitting the army in half to deal with a war on both fronts. To defeat France so quickly, they would need the element of surprise. Most of the French army was stationed on the border with Germany in the historically disputed region of Alsace - Lorraine. ...read more.

Middle

They had to fight against the Allies in the west, and the Russians in the east, as the Kaiser had feared in 1914. However, the Germans realised that they still had not captured the Channel ports. Which provided the flow of British troops and French supplies. Germany's big chance was to close the ports and block Ally supplies. Due to this, the 'race to the sea' occurred. Both Germany and Britain had formidable navies, which were fighting for control over the ports. Eventually, an uncomfortable stillness settled along the Western Front. The Germans stood their ground firmly, to prevent losing the ground that they had already captured. The French and British were unable to drive Germany back. The soldiers were then forced to dig into the ground for safety. With the passing of time, a series of trenches were built. The trenches saw the bloodshed and senseless fighting of the stalemate, and thousands of soldiers died, where most were driven to the brink of insanity. A stalemate had been reached. Breaking the Stalemate In March 1918, the German army broke the Stalemate. There are several factors as to why the stalemate was finally broken. Most historians think that that they are all of equal importance and it was a combination of four factors that broke the stalemate. These factors were the American entry into the War, the introduction of new technologies, the blockading of the German ports, and the German offensive used in March 1918. ...read more.

Conclusion

There were other factors involved leading to the breaking of the stalemate, but these were, by far the most effective. The departure of Russia from the War helped Germany almost win the war on the sea. The submarine warfare led to the entry of the American troops. Their fresh soldiers and money helped the Allies. This was a great advantage against the exhausted German troops. The German Allies soon began to surrender leaving Germany alone on the battlefield. The entry of new money in the War helped the Allies blockade the ports, and keep the blockade secure, resulting in a political and economical crisis in Germany. The lack of weapons and supplies then affected the soldiers on the battlefield, and an armistice was called on the 11th of November. In conclusion, I agree with the statement saying that these for factors were of equal importance as to why the stalemate on the Western Front was finally broken. Parts of a factor lead to a development of parts of another factor, which eventually lead to allied victory. The Russian Revolution and submarine warfare began this chain, and before the armistice, the lack of supplies and failure of the German offensive ended the chain. However, these four factors alone were not the overall reason why the stalemate was broken as they were not enough to completely break the stalemate on the Western Front alone, counter attack plans from the Allies like the Foch strategy also helped break stalemate. Tasneem Sadiq 10A 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Explain how the Schlieffen Plan was meant to work?

    With his army exhausted and many of his best forces killed, Moltke was defeated at the battle of the Marne on 6-10 September 1914. Another thing which went wrong for the Germans was, Russia mobilising in 10 days which meant the Germans had to send troops to the eastern front and weakened the western front.

  2. Essay on the Schlieffen Plan

    Many believe they can be blamed for the alterations made, going against Schlieffen's whole concept of a swift attack on France using a huge number of men.

  1. The Marshall Plan.

    require a much longer time and greater effort than had been foreseen. There is a phase of this matter which is both interesting and serious. The farmer has always produced the foodstuffs to exchange with the city dweller for the other necessities of life.

  2. Explain how the schlieffen plan was meant to work The schlieffen plan was concocted ...

    Germany had planned out every bit of the plan including railway time tables. But not failure! Why did a stalemate develop on the western front? A stalemate devolved on the western front for several reasons. One of the main reasons is because the schlieffen plan failed so that triggered trench

  1. To what extent did the failure of the Schlieffen Plan lead to Germany's defeat ...

    These American troops were fresh and not tired like the other troops meaning that their power was increasingly high. Although, their entry had not started out as a huge draw back to Germany as a nation as the war continued their entry into the war was a huge decisive factor for the Allies.

  2. The Schlieffen Plan and the Reality

    After dealing with the Belgians the Germans then intended to move rapidly on to capture the capital of France which was Paris. The Germans also assumed that Britain would not go to war and expected them to stay neutral and didn't expect them to go to war over their 1839

  1. The Role of Alfred von Tirpitz in the Anglo- German Naval Race.

    "Risk theory" was the idea that the German navy would be strong enough that if Britain risked battle, Tirpitz believed, "the defeat of a strong German fleet would so substantially weaken the enemy that, in spite of a victory he might have obtained, his own position in the world would

  2. Was the German defeat on the Western Front caused by the failure of the ...

    And the implementation of the allied blockade in 1916 caused a shortage of raw material with which to make arms. The Germans also did not have the tank, which proved helpful to some Allied breakthroughs towards the end of the war: it was useful in industrialized warfare.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work