• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain the importance of the war at sea to the final outcome of the war.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Explain the importance of the war at sea to the final outcome of the war. The sea campaigns of the First World War were unusual in that, although they were crucially important, relatively little fighting took place between warships. The key objective was to gain control of the seas so the enemy would find it difficult getting supplies into their country. The British blockade of the German ports which halted supplies reaching Germany was a vital factor in the Allied victory over Germany. It was just as important as any military victory on land. Both sides knew how important it was to have control over the sea, and the war at sea became a cautious war. The British Commander Admiral Jellicoe said that he 'could lose the war in an afternoon' if he made any mistakes. I think this shows the importance of the naval war because if any mistakes were made it could lose the war for Britain. ...read more.

Middle

The British Grand fleet was mainly based at Scapa Flow, just off the north coast, and was in a position there to have full control of the North Sea. All the German's merchant shipping had to be limited to the Baltic Sea. At first this pressure was not as effective as it could have been. This was because no blockade was enforced on neutral countries that might trade with Germany. By 1915 German imports were down to 55% of their pre-war levels. The Germans also succeeded in cutting British food imports to 75% of their 1913 level. By 1918 it was down to 65%. This shows how important it was to not let enemy countries get supplies. The introduction of the convoy system severely reduced the success of the German U-boats that had been targeting merchant shipping. Also the Americans were able to produce ships faster than the Germans could sink them. ...read more.

Conclusion

This last point was especially significant since it blocked the supply route to the Russians, who desperately needed help. This block was probably a major factor in Russia withdrawing from the war. There were also negative aspects from the German perspective. If the Battle of Jutland had removed tsarist Russia as a threat it must therefore have assisted the rise of the Bolsheviks to power. Also the increased use of submarines after the success of Jutland prompted America to join the war. The entrance of the U.S.A effectively turned the war in the allies favor. So looking at this I would say the Battle of Jutland was quite significant and played quite an important role of the outcome of the war. In the short-term story of the war between Germany and Britain the battle was ultimately indecisive. Overall the naval efforts were eclipsed by events further south. Victory and defeat would be decided on dry land in the muddy trenches of Belgium and France, not the icy waves of the North and Baltic seas. Christopher Goode 10L 5/7/2007 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Post-Cold War Realities

    They claim, quite sensibly really, that the Caspian Sea is, in fact, a sea. As such, the maritime borders entitle them to their own respective territorial zones. Not surprisingly, this legal tack would place the huge southern Caspian Alov structure in Azeri waters and the northern Kashagan field (second largest find in 30 years)

  2. The Prelude to the 1975 War and the Cairo Agreement.

    At the end of the war an official Lebanese government report was released which breaks down the casualty figures from 1975 to 1990, this put the total number of dead in Sabra and Shatila massacre at 857 and the number of wounded at 1,124.

  1. How Stable Was the Tsarist Autocracy in 1914?

    This is diametrically opposite to the liberal idea to less disturbances and more rural contentment. This only highlights and identifies the complex problem of stability in the regions surrounding the towns.

  2. How important was the war at sea

    The U-boats changed the war at sea. The result of the U-boat campaign was that Britain had 6 weeks supply of wheat left in 1917 and millions of tons of shipping was lost. The U-boats also caused huge minefields to be laid in the English Channel and the introducing of the convoy system by Lloyd George.

  1. How important were all these fronts to the final outcome of the war.

    Though at the same time the war in the air lowered morale and really proved the term total war as in 1915 zeppelins attacked the home front. "Civilians in Britain no longer seemed safe." They were unable to carry bombs that would do any real physical damage but the physiological damage was horrendous.

  2. How Important was the War at Sea to the Final Outcome of the war?

    They were created for roaming underwater this meant that they were hard to see. The torpedo was another great advance; this is shown in quote 3). 3) "Even the mightiest battleship was vulnerable to a torpedo from the smallest submarine."

  1. Explain the importance of the war at sea to the final outcome of the ...

    The role that Russia had been playing had always been diminishing and the Russians needed major aid from the Allies if they were to play any role on the war whatsoever. In the entire war between Germany and Britain, the battle was ultimately indecisive.

  2. Explain the importance of the war in the air to the outcome of the ...

    The first and main role that aircraft played was reconnaissance. Air-to-ground communication developed steadily and was used to guide artillery fire. Reconnaissance played a large part in keeping the war of attrition alive. The ability of aircraft to keep track of enemy troops in conjunction with ground troops helped keep

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work