• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"Explain why it was Stalin rather than Trotsky who succeeded Lenin as ruler of the USSR"

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The Succession of Lenin - Stalin or Trotsky 24th January 2004 "Explain why it was Stalin rather than Trotsky who succeeded Lenin as ruler of the USSR" After Lenin's death in 1924, there was a struggle between the leading Bolsheviks to succeed Lenin as leader of the USSR. In the end, it emerged as a contest between Leon Trotsky and Joseph Stalin. There were several reasons why it was Stalin rather than Trotsky who succeeded Lenin, and it is these I shall be exploring in this essay. Trotsky seemed like the obvious successor, and consequently he became inactive. He was over-confident, arrogant, and failed to take any threat seriously, least of all the quiet Stalin and so did nothing to try to discredit Stalin or reverse the damage Stalin did to him. In late 1923, when Trotsky needed to be at his most active, he became ill with a malaria-like disease. ...read more.

Middle

He also failed to compromise or heal arguments with Bolsheviks like Zinoviev who could have supported him as he put his beliefs over power due to his over-confidence. His maintenance of beliefs led to his statement of the opposition leaders criticizing the Politburo majority after Zinoviev's removal, his demonstrations on the anniversary of the October revolution and his failure to accept the XV Congress' decision which gave anyone with a Politburo majority the power to remove him from the party. Stalin's deviousness and cunning went unhindered as a result of Trotsky's inactiveness. He deceived Trotsky about the date of Lenin's funeral so Trotsky did not appear while appearing the biggest mourner, set up the Cult of Lenin and became associated with the deceased whenever possible to sway the public towards him. Stalin stayed out of the Zinoviev, Kamenev and Trotsky conflict to emerge as a candidate for succesion. ...read more.

Conclusion

Stalin used this Politburo majority to have Trotsky, as a result of his maintenance of beliefs, removed from the Politburo and any real chance of succeeding Lenin. Stalin used his exploited position to remove Trotsky from the party and dominate the XV Congress which's decision of removing all of Stalin's opponents Trotsky could not accept for his beliefs, and have him exiled to Siberia with no power to succeed Lenin and Stalin with it all. In conclusion, it was a combination of linked factors which resulted in Stalin rather than Trotsky succeeding Lenin. What Trotsky did to loose; Trotsky's inactiveness, his unpopularity with the party caused by his maintenance of strong beliefs. And then what Stalin did to win; Stalin's cunning, single-minded ambition and political exploitation which resulted in the order of events leading to the consequential expulsion of Trotsky from the party and exile to Siberia in 1927, which finally saw Stalin rather than Trotsky succeed Lenin as ruler of the USSR. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Compare the Characters and beliefs of Lenin and Stalin

    They completely abolished all opposition by rousing fear, they killed 200,000 people and imprisoned a further 85,000. The Cheka played an important part to Lenin's plan to keep communism in existence, Felix Dzerhinsky, the leader of the Cheka, performed his job well.

  2. Stalin Vs. Trotsky.

    None of the other groups found this pose to its taste. During the years just before World War I Trotsky's anti-factionalist stand became in effect an anti-Leninist one. After the war began he went to New York, and it was from there that he traveled to Russia in the spring of 1917.

  1. Stalin and the Modernisation of the USSR

    So in conclusion, the purges did play a very important part in Stalin's control of the USSR, because it got rid of all of Stalin's rivals and opposition, and without anyone to oppose him, Stalin could get a tighter grip on the Soviet Union.

  2. Stalin and Trotsky

    people to express their opinions on problems and as a result, the people are getting in the way of his goals. For intellectuals, ideas are primarily developed in their heads and are rarely or never put into action as reality.

  1. How Did Trotsky Contribute To

    This was abnormal because of the fact he had only just returned to the country but his popularity became obvious because of this. In the month of his appointment as chairman of The Petrograd Soviet he was also planning a coup on the provisional government with a Bolshevik attack.

  2. Stalin succeeded as the leader to Lenin and not Trotsky for many reasons. He ...

    Trotsky then led his 5 million man army to victory so it was him who ensured the survival of the Bolshevik party. 2) Stalin succeeded as the leader to Lenin and not Trotsky for many reasons. He was very close to Lenin and had always been a loyal supporter of him.

  1. The Impact of Stalins Leadership in the USSR, 1924 1941. Extensive notes

    Collectivisation was occurring at the same time. The labour force expanded during this period. 1930-2: Expansion was strained as the USSR struggled to meet the over-ambitious targets. Industrial production slowed, and there was also a temporary halt to collectivisation. Government adopted a more realistic approach to expansion.

  2. Compare the characters and beliefs of Lenin and Stalin.

    The Nepmen set up restaurants and made enormous amounts of money. The majority realised that these measures were needed to revive industry and get more food production, therefore the shortages of food would be temporaly stopped until they would recover completely, so food would be no more rationed.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work