• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

French Revolution a Bourgeoisie Revolution?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Why do some historians regard the French Revolution as a 'Bourgeoisie Revolution'? Why do some revisionists dispute this view? Historians who refer to the French Revolution as a 'Bourgeoisie Revolution' may do so considering several factors like, the bourgeoisie being the chief beneficiaries of the revolution; and the power struggle they were confronted with in the form of a socially exclusive nobility determined to preserve their rights of luxury from a 'wealthy, talented and progressive' bourgeoisie. Revisionists who dispute the claims that the bourgeoisie were the ultimate cause of the Revolution include many reasons such as the fact that the nobles and the bourgeoisie were infact not clearly differentiated as two separate class estates because of their many shared interests and the passage into nobility being only a matter of wealth or marriage. ...read more.

Middle

Not is it now possible to maintain that this elite grew less open as the eighteenth century went on thanks to some exclusive 'aristocratic reaction' Revisionists also tend to support the view that both groups shared liberal values of the philosophes. While the bourgeoisie were essentially moderate, the nobles acquired a capitalist mentality and both desired the extinction of monarchical despotism and reformation of France according to rational standards. The elimination of aristocratic privileges, according to revisionists, was never part of a preconceived bourgeoisie program, but an improvised response to the violent upheavals in the country side in july and august 1789. In addition to that, a struggle erupted over the composition of the Estates General, this lead to a sudden class consciousness among the bourgeoisie. Albert Soboul being one of the historians that support the 'Bourgeoisie Revolution' states, "the essential cause of the Revolution was the power of a Bourgeoisie arrived at its maturity and confronted by a decadent aristocracy holding tenaciously to it's privileges." ...read more.

Conclusion

For instance, they demanded a constitution representing the whole "nation". This aim was openly expressed in an immensely influential pamphlet that appeared in 1789 called 'What is the Third Estate?' written by Abbe Sieyes. The pamphlet answered the question arguing that the Third Estate alone constituted the nation, the nobility being nothing but privileged parasites: "The nobility...is truly a nation apart, but a bogus one which, lacking organs to keep it alive, clings to a real nation like those vegetable parasites which can live only on the sap of the plants that they impoverish and blight." This also further reflects the great class differences and the resentment and rage. The constitution also incorporated the Declaration of the Rights of Man and the Citizen that had been adopted by the National Assembly in August 1789. This was drawn up by and therefore favouring the bourgeoisie as they were the ones overlooking it. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Major Causes of French Revolution

    4 star(s)

    though privileged and mostly wealthy, was deeply resentful of its long exclusion from office; a bourgeoisie, though enjoying increasing prosperity, was denied the social status and share in government equality with its wealth; and the peasants who (in part at least)

  2. 'The French Revolution was directed by the middle class.' How valid is this comment ...

    revolt because they feared that they would lose some of the improvements they had had since the Assembly's rise to power. The fact that passive citizens were not admitted into the National Guard could explain the control the Assembly kept over France, as revolutionary groups did not have the organisation or weaponry they needed in order to take over.

  1. 'In the context of the period 1715-1815 to what extent were economic factors the ...

    The Napoleonic system of administration still exists in France today, showing just how much of an advantage a successful system of government could have been to Louis XVI. However, not all historians would agree with this view. Revisionists began altering the interpretations of Lefebvre in the 1960s, disagreeing with Lefebvre's vision of a 'social revolution'.

  2. In the process of consolidating his position, Napoleons reforms, had by 1808, destroyed the ...

    This describes the Civil Code in general - although it is obvious that it is not a document that exudes complete equality, it does, to a point, maintain some equality, albeit however limited.

  1. Why did the French Revolution end in 1799?

    The reign of terror imbued Frenchmen with such mutual hatred as only despotism could control2 After Thermidor, the corruption and instability of civilian authority led France to give their primary allegiance to Napoleon. He was viewed as a new hope for France and a saviour to all classes.

  2. Russian Revolution Sources Question

    For many Russian people communism was a good thing. Peasants were able to take land from their owners. At first the Bolsheviks the peasants were useless but Lenin realised they were important to the revolution. Trotsky, a fellow Bolshevik described the Russian peasants as "the pack-animals of history".

  1. FRench revolution

    The king could not make laws on his own; he had to consult his council of ministers and advisors in order to pass a law. As the king was only answerable to by God, he then had to portray that he was strong and dominant person Louis XVI was not a strong figure but in fact rather weak.

  2. Notes and Reading on the causes of the French Revolution.

    Why schama is incorrect in saying that the social structure of France did no cause the French revolution but social issues did. He is correct in some sense but he is incorrect in saying that they are completely un-linked. Social issues are as a result of what the social structure implemented on to them.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work