• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How did the USA escalate their involvement in Vietnam?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How and why did the USA escalate their involvement in Vietnam during the Presidencies of Truman and Eisenhower? During 1954 to 1965, America became increasingly involved in the affairs of Vietnam. This was due to many important reasons, the most important being that of America's paranoia of communism and the way the USA felt it was compelled to contain it. Throughout these years the US presidents Eisenhower and Truman could have withdrawn and stopped giving aid to South Vietnam and the French, but didn't, they saw Vietnam as a tactical advantage and it was a littoral example to the world that the US was taking a stand against the spread of communist ideology. From 1946 the Vietminh, an organisation set-up and led by the patriotic Maoist/Marxist Ho Chi Minh, fought heavily with the French. They had fought against the Japanese Imperial invaders during the Second World War and were not going to roll over to be exploited by their European masters having been abandoned previously. ...read more.

Middle

The year 1954 was a major turning point, which brought the Americans very close to involvement of the conflict. The battle of Dien Bien Phu, in which the French were defeated by the Vietminh, caused the French to give up Indo-China. The Geneva peace agreement led to the temporary partition of Vietnam due to elections that were set to be held in1956 in which the Vietnamese people could vote for their new leader. The Vietminh leader, Ho Chi Minh was installed as the leader of North Vietnam and Bao Dai as the leader of South Vietnam. Bao Dai was extremely unpopular in South Vietnam and many in the Eisenhower administration believed that if any national election was to be held Ho would win and spread his influence to the south, creating a Communist state and backing up the "Domino theory". The historical reputation of Dwight D. Eisenhower, war hero and thirty-fourth president of the United States sank to a low point after he left the White House in January 1961. ...read more.

Conclusion

They saw Eisenhower's conservative agenda as a program to benefit the privileged and the wealthy, a Republican reaction to the progress made under Democratic reformers. They ridiculed Eisenhower's efforts to achieve economic responsibility and decentralized government, claiming that these efforts were little more than a smokescreen covering the president's insensitivity to the needs of the less fortunate elements of American society. Eisenhower's foreign policy which had resulted in seven-and-a-half years of peace came in for somewhat less criticism. Nevertheless, many criticized Vice-president Nixon's emphasis on nuclear weapons and the doctrine of massive retaliation. Most of the criticisms, however, were directed at Eisenhower's supposed failure to pursue the cold war vigorously and successfully. Eisenhower's misguided efforts to balance the federal budget, it was said, had resulted in an inadequate military posture and an unwillingness to confront America's communist enemies in areas involving either conventional or guerrilla warfare. The whole situation and the USA's stance on Vietnam seems to be a mixture of paranoia of Communism, and a reluctance to enter another war. ?? ?? ?? ?? Jack Cooper Mrs Colvin AS History ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Evaluate the presidency of Dwight Eisenhower.

    his hawk like advice to later presidents in favor of war (Schlesinger, 403-4). Historian Stephen E. Ambrose presents a much more positive view of the presidency of Dwight D. Eisenhower. He praises President Eisenhower for making peace in Korea and keeping peace during the rest of his terms, especially in Vietnam in 1954.

  2. During Eisenhower's presidency what were the arguments for and against US intervention in Vietnam? ...

    The Geneva peace agreement led to the temporary partition of Vietnam. This was to be temporary as the elections were to be held in1956 in which the Vietnamese could vote for their leader. The Vietminh leader, Ho Chi Minh controlled North Vietnam and Bao Dai Controlled South Vietnam.

  1. Why did the USA become involved in Vietnam in the 1950s and 1960s?

    been for some time, but there were some people who simply felt that Vietnam was not worth the lives of all their young American men. This was also a period when 'flower power' bloomed. This increased the anti-war sentiments. The press also helped to increase the pressure on the government

  2. Is There Still an Imperial Presidency?

    Towards the end of Clintons second term, the imperial presidency was as free and as alarming as it has been at any time since the Vietnam War. Now, with all this said the important question is to know how the current administration works, "Is President George w.

  1. Explain Why There Were Such Different Reactions In The USA To The Country's Involvement ...

    The documents also showed something important and this was that the American government hadn't really known what they had got the country involved in during this war. By 1969 even Ellsberg himself had begun to become an opponent of the war.

  2. The Prelude to the 1975 War and the Cairo Agreement.

    His men, most of them professional and well-equipped soldiers, emptied or besieged the Christian towns and villages. It cannot be told how many people they killed, only it is certain they amounted to thousands. And as thousands more fled the country, Lieutenant al-Khatib came near to satisfying his highly publicized

  1. To what extent was involvement of USA in Korean War Different from its involvement ...

    However both powers claimed their part very soon. Both powers set up a divisor line along the 38th parallel, where the North would be under Soviet aim and the South by American intervention. Then, although elections were held in South Korea (August 1938)

  2. Why did the USA send troops into Vietnam

    Cold war could occur so the Americans began to publicly support the French war effort. Firstly by injecting $500million a year, this soon payed off as the French were able to set up a non-communist government in the South. By 1953, the French and the Vietminh had gained no extra ground as both the North and South were fiercely defended.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work