• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How did the USA escalate their involvement in Vietnam?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How and why did the USA escalate their involvement in Vietnam during the Presidencies of Truman and Eisenhower? During 1954 to 1965, America became increasingly involved in the affairs of Vietnam. This was due to many important reasons, the most important being that of America's paranoia of communism and the way the USA felt it was compelled to contain it. Throughout these years the US presidents Eisenhower and Truman could have withdrawn and stopped giving aid to South Vietnam and the French, but didn't, they saw Vietnam as a tactical advantage and it was a littoral example to the world that the US was taking a stand against the spread of communist ideology. From 1946 the Vietminh, an organisation set-up and led by the patriotic Maoist/Marxist Ho Chi Minh, fought heavily with the French. They had fought against the Japanese Imperial invaders during the Second World War and were not going to roll over to be exploited by their European masters having been abandoned previously. ...read more.

Middle

The year 1954 was a major turning point, which brought the Americans very close to involvement of the conflict. The battle of Dien Bien Phu, in which the French were defeated by the Vietminh, caused the French to give up Indo-China. The Geneva peace agreement led to the temporary partition of Vietnam due to elections that were set to be held in1956 in which the Vietnamese people could vote for their new leader. The Vietminh leader, Ho Chi Minh was installed as the leader of North Vietnam and Bao Dai as the leader of South Vietnam. Bao Dai was extremely unpopular in South Vietnam and many in the Eisenhower administration believed that if any national election was to be held Ho would win and spread his influence to the south, creating a Communist state and backing up the "Domino theory". The historical reputation of Dwight D. Eisenhower, war hero and thirty-fourth president of the United States sank to a low point after he left the White House in January 1961. ...read more.

Conclusion

They saw Eisenhower's conservative agenda as a program to benefit the privileged and the wealthy, a Republican reaction to the progress made under Democratic reformers. They ridiculed Eisenhower's efforts to achieve economic responsibility and decentralized government, claiming that these efforts were little more than a smokescreen covering the president's insensitivity to the needs of the less fortunate elements of American society. Eisenhower's foreign policy which had resulted in seven-and-a-half years of peace came in for somewhat less criticism. Nevertheless, many criticized Vice-president Nixon's emphasis on nuclear weapons and the doctrine of massive retaliation. Most of the criticisms, however, were directed at Eisenhower's supposed failure to pursue the cold war vigorously and successfully. Eisenhower's misguided efforts to balance the federal budget, it was said, had resulted in an inadequate military posture and an unwillingness to confront America's communist enemies in areas involving either conventional or guerrilla warfare. The whole situation and the USA's stance on Vietnam seems to be a mixture of paranoia of Communism, and a reluctance to enter another war. ?? ?? ?? ?? Jack Cooper Mrs Colvin AS History ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Evaluate the presidency of Dwight Eisenhower.

    Oddly enough, in the following section Schlesinger calls that campaign "a passing phase" (Schlesinger, 402) and presents a positive view of President Eisenhower's atoms for peace plan and open skies(Schlesinger, 403). His final criticisms of President Eisenhower come in regards to the buildup of atomic weapons during his terms and

  2. Explain Why There Were Such Different Reactions In The USA To The Country's Involvement ...

    He was sentenced to life for personally killing 22 villagers. But after three and a half years President Nixon realised him and he was a free man again. All the killings split America. Some people decide to defend Calley and his men because they were thought to have done the best, while fighting for the country.

  1. To what extent was involvement of USA in Korean War Different from its involvement ...

    However, this failed since most of the peasants were members of the Vietcong. -Johnson (1963-9) decided to bomb North Vietnam (1965), as he thought that Ho Chi Minh controlled directly the Vietcong. He also sent half million troops in the south.

  2. American History.

    *Sectors of the Market Economy: The Rise of Manufacturing and Commerce* - American production began with copies of British or other European designs, but before long Americans were creating their own machines [ex. Matthew Baldwin, steam locomotives, by 1840 exported internat'lly].

  1. Why did the USA become involved in Vietnam in the 1950s and 1960s?

    There were the groups of people who opposed all war such as pacifists or strong Christians who believed that all war was wrong on moral and religious grounds. And yet there may have been some Christians who were pro-war because they saw communism as atheism and so believed that it should not be allowed to spread.

  2. Why did the USA send troops into Vietnam

    Both countries began spending billions on weapons of mass destruction and spy missions to understand the others intentions. The two nations could NOT trust each other, as they were sure that their political system was far superior than the others. The Truman doctrine was formed into the policy of containment.

  1. During Eisenhower's presidency what were the arguments for and against US intervention in Vietnam? ...

    The Geneva peace agreement led to the temporary partition of Vietnam. This was to be temporary as the elections were to be held in1956 in which the Vietnamese could vote for their leader. The Vietminh leader, Ho Chi Minh controlled North Vietnam and Bao Dai Controlled South Vietnam.

  2. The Prelude to the 1975 War and the Cairo Agreement.

    The intervention of the Khatib's Lebanese Arab Army on the side of the PLO was a disaster for the Lebanese Front. Ahmad al-Khatib was a cousin of a socialist deputy named Zahir al-Khatib, who was a friend of Kamal Jumblatt.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work