• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far did the home front contribute to America's inability to defeat the Communists in Vietnam?

Extracts from this document...


How far did the home front contribute to America's inability to defeat the Communists in Vietnam? The home front highlighted America's inability to defeat the Communists in Vietnam. The anti-war movement put pressure on the government not to commit more troops to Vietnam; the movement also questioned the use of technological weapons by the American troops and the nature of the South Vietnamese government that the USA was supporting. The prime factors that contributed to America's inability to defeat the Communists were: that the Americans were unsuccessful in understanding the Vietnamese people, culture and history, the failure of the American military strategy and the American failure of political will. These factors were brought to light when the home front began to collapse. The home front, in general, initially supported the US involvement in Vietnam. But in 1964 anti-war protests began, although these protests did not become significant until the late 1960s, when opposition to the war had gained more support. ...read more.


This programme was unsuccessful in dramatically weakening the Communist enemy and killed many innocent Vietnamese, and for this reason many Vietnamese civilians began to sympathise with the Communists. The strategic hamlets programme did not take into account the culture and tradition of the South Vietnamese people, many became disillusioned with the Americans who were supposedly protecting them. Further alienation of the South Vietnamese civilians came when the American troops went on 'search and destroy missions'. The Americans did not attempt to win over 'the hearts and the minds' of the Vietnamese civilians, which was one strength of the Communists. Perhaps the most significant failure of the Americans was to overlook the Nationalism that the Communists were fighting for and view the war in the context of the Cold war. American strategy also failed to take into account the determination of the Communists, who wanted to rid their country of foreigners. ...read more.


Nixon could not justify to a public that was divided over the war that sending more troops would ensure American success. To conclude, the Americans were unable to defeat the Communists in Vietnam because their methods of waging war were unsuitable for the terrain and combating guerrilla warfare. The American government and troops knew little about the Vietnamese culture and history and failed to understand them. The American troops alienated many South Vietnamese with their behaviour towards the civilians and programmes that aimed to weaken the Communists. Ultimately the Americans failed to win over the 'hearts and the minds' of the South Vietnamese and were unable to see that the enemy's nationalism came before their communism. The home front did not contribute to America's inability to defeat the Communists but the anti-war movement, influenced by the media, signified that many were becoming disillusioned with the war and were not in support of the methods used in Vietnam. This movement questioned whether the communists could actually be defeated by the Americans and put pressure on the government to review its presence in Vietnam. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. American History.

    This not only unified whites and blurred class distinctions between them, but also led to the creation of a certain set of characteristics (laziness, dishonesty, sexual promiscuity) that became associated with all blacks. - From the start, then, the republic was seen as a white male enterprise - some historians

  2. Why did the Communists win in 1949?

    Our situation has become intolerable... Let us not mince words, soldiers and bandits are two names for the same thing." This passage above is from a letter in a Chinese newspaper. Even with the revolution, the same problems still faced China.

  1. The home front (source based work) 1914 - 1918.

    You can see that these women are having a hard time, as they are not looking happy at all. If one looks closely at the picture you can also see that the women are working with hammer, which is usually considered a man's job, therefore the suffragettes could use it

  2. What role did the media play in the war effort on the home front?

    'We'll meet again' was the signature tune. This show was for cheering up the soldiers away fighting, they would know that their wife/ girlfriend was thinking about them. There was a programme dedicated to children it was called the 'Children's Hour'.

  1. In search of home.

    He was somewhat embarrassed not to have brought the "cargo treasure"(67) the other foreign Vietnamese bring. Later when he was wondering the streets of Saigon he sees the wanting-wanting-wanting Vietnamese people as strangers (102). He pities the Vietnamese who believe with all their hearts that Vietnam, indeed, is the most gorgeous place on earth (155).

  2. The Home Front

    In the autumn of that year, many different organisations for women were set up. Usually women 's main role was seen as being to raise children and look after the home. They were not expected to take positions of leadership.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work