• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far do you agree that Lenins leadership was the main reason why the Bolsheviks were able to seize power?

Extracts from this document...


How far do you agree that Lenin's leadership was the main reason why the Bolsheviks were able to seize power? The Bolsheviks were able to successfully seize power for many reasons. Firstly the weakness of the provisional government made it easy to take power, secondly Trotsky's careful planning made sure the take-over was executed with great efficiency and finally the return of Lenin did help to build support and encourage the Bolsheviks to seize power. The First main reason the Bolsheviks were able to seize power was the failure the Provisional Government brought on itself. It had failed miserably in solving Russia's problems. The government was unsuccessful in combating the problem of having two governments it simply undermined its own power by doing nothing to stop the Soviets, it continued to fight a war the country could not afford and that was not supported by its people and a war in which in the end Russia did badly in, plus there was a massive ...read more.


Kerensky had not only reiterated the weakness of the Provisional Government to the people but he had also freed many members of the opposing political party and armed them. This event also moved the Provisional Government more to the right meaning the Soviets moved further into the left wing. In moving further towards the left the soviet now, in Kerensky's opinion, was of little threat, he feared the right wing parties more. This meant Kerensky didn't act decisively to stop the Bolsheviks. Again these reasons that aided the Bolshevik success in seizing power had nothing to do with Lenin and so cannot be put down to his leadership. Another reason for Bolshevik success was that the Petrograd Garrison fled due to the fact they had had enough of fighting in the war and now disagreed with the Provisional Government. This meant that when the Bolsheviks and the Red Army stormed the winter palace there was no resistance they simply walked in and the few Cossacks and cadets simply left. ...read more.


Trotsky was the chairman of the Petrograd Soviet and had worked on a brilliantly effective plan, with him in control of the takeover it was an almost effortless seizure of power. Also the members on the central committee who were wavering over whether or not to begin a revolution and overthrow the government were convinced now was the right time and that they had a sufficiently detailed enough plan to pull it off by Lenin, without the return of Lenin and his leading of the Bolsheviks these members may not have decided to act and the revolution may never have happened. Overall I think that although Lenin's return and his subsequent leadership did to some extent play a part in the success of the Bolshevik seizure of power it was not a key part in why they gained power. The provisional Government was already experiencing problems and because of this losing support, even if Lenin hadn't returned the government would have fallen and in my opinion this is the main reason the Bolsheviks were able to seize power. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

4 star(s)

This is a clearly structured response that shows good understanding of the key events that led to the October revolution. There are many counter arguments that need to be considered more though. 4 out of 5 stars.

Marked by teacher Natalya Luck 17/09/2013

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. To what extent were germany to blame for the outbreak of ww1

    The Moroccan 'independent' Government provided the German Foreign officer an opportunity for action. The French sent troops to Fez to resolve anti - foreign riots.

  2. How secure was the USSR’s control over Eastern Europe 1948-89?

    Although being outlawed, Solidarity started operating openly and gaining influence once again. In 1986 it threatened to call a nationwide strike against price rises and the government backed down. Lech Walesa was treated like Poland's leader. 9. How did Gorbachev change Eastern Europe? 10. Profile Mikhail Gorbachev * Born 1931.

  1. Assess in general terms the economic, social and political impact of the First World ...

    Effectively the political landscape of Europe changed, as did its power. The west now had far more control over Central and Eastern Europe. Not so much in terms of its power over the regions, but purely in terms economic and political stability.

  2. Assessing the impact of the first world war on international relations in the decade ...

    the treaty of Sevres, which guaranteed the Greeks to stay in Turkey for fie years until it was democratized.10 Although the Sultan was ready to accept the treaty term, Turkish nationalities werenot.This is what led to nationalism led by veteran General Mustafa Kemal backed allied assistance to demand the retention

  1. To what extent did the foreign intervention influence the outcome of the Spanish Civil ...

    These problems involved Manuel Aza�a and Niceto Alcala Zamora. Zamora was elected president on the 1931 election with 34.3% of the votes. The first actions of his government were the release of all left-wing political prisoners, the introduction of agrarian reforms, which penalized the aristocracy with important farming lands and the transfer of right-wing leaders such as Franco to

  2. To what extent was Collectivisation a success?

    Stalin's fear of resistance which could lead to the collapse of grain production made him resort to call a halt to Collectivisation, saying that they had become 'dizzy with success'. An end was called to the 'voluntary' principle, and this choice of abandoning collective farms was widely accepted and a

  1. To what extent was Hitler solely responsible for the Holocaust

    evidence suggests that Hitler had always insisted on a definitive solution to the Jewish question. . While Hitler's hatred for the Jews was demonstrated through his speeches and of course their removal was core to his creed, how were his strong anti-Semitic views able to translate into policies which saw their ultimate extermination?

  2. Short term and Long term Causes of the Cold War.

    An estimated 20 million Soviet people had died. Stalin was therefore concerned about the future security of the USSR. The Big Three agreed that Eastern Europe should be seen as 'a Soviet sphere of influence'. The Soviets and the Americans interpreted it differently. The Agreement talked about the need for 'democracy' and 'free elections'.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work