• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far do you agree that Lenins leadership was the main reason why the Bolsheviks were able to seize power?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How far do you agree that Lenin's leadership was the main reason why the Bolsheviks were able to seize power? The Bolsheviks were able to successfully seize power for many reasons. Firstly the weakness of the provisional government made it easy to take power, secondly Trotsky's careful planning made sure the take-over was executed with great efficiency and finally the return of Lenin did help to build support and encourage the Bolsheviks to seize power. The First main reason the Bolsheviks were able to seize power was the failure the Provisional Government brought on itself. It had failed miserably in solving Russia's problems. The government was unsuccessful in combating the problem of having two governments it simply undermined its own power by doing nothing to stop the Soviets, it continued to fight a war the country could not afford and that was not supported by its people and a war in which in the end Russia did badly in, plus there was a massive ...read more.

Middle

Kerensky had not only reiterated the weakness of the Provisional Government to the people but he had also freed many members of the opposing political party and armed them. This event also moved the Provisional Government more to the right meaning the Soviets moved further into the left wing. In moving further towards the left the soviet now, in Kerensky's opinion, was of little threat, he feared the right wing parties more. This meant Kerensky didn't act decisively to stop the Bolsheviks. Again these reasons that aided the Bolshevik success in seizing power had nothing to do with Lenin and so cannot be put down to his leadership. Another reason for Bolshevik success was that the Petrograd Garrison fled due to the fact they had had enough of fighting in the war and now disagreed with the Provisional Government. This meant that when the Bolsheviks and the Red Army stormed the winter palace there was no resistance they simply walked in and the few Cossacks and cadets simply left. ...read more.

Conclusion

Trotsky was the chairman of the Petrograd Soviet and had worked on a brilliantly effective plan, with him in control of the takeover it was an almost effortless seizure of power. Also the members on the central committee who were wavering over whether or not to begin a revolution and overthrow the government were convinced now was the right time and that they had a sufficiently detailed enough plan to pull it off by Lenin, without the return of Lenin and his leading of the Bolsheviks these members may not have decided to act and the revolution may never have happened. Overall I think that although Lenin's return and his subsequent leadership did to some extent play a part in the success of the Bolshevik seizure of power it was not a key part in why they gained power. The provisional Government was already experiencing problems and because of this losing support, even if Lenin hadn't returned the government would have fallen and in my opinion this is the main reason the Bolsheviks were able to seize power. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

4 star(s)

This is a clearly structured response that shows good understanding of the key events that led to the October revolution. There are many counter arguments that need to be considered more though. 4 out of 5 stars.

Marked by teacher Natalya Luck 17/09/2013

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. To what extent was Stalin to blame for the Berlin crisis 1948-9?

    designed to contain the spread of communism and even bring Soviet satellites to capitalism, Ryan's argument suggests some cominform states were "willing participants'' but "ultimately, Stalin pressured them into withdrawing''17 and there is further evidence to validate his argument as these countries were devastated following the war.

  2. Why did Mao Zedong introduce a second five year plan in 1958 and to ...

    Between 30-50 families, usually the people of one village pulled their land and resources to make one bigger, more efficient farm. They still owned their plots of land but the land was on permanent loan to the co-operatives, for which each family was paid a rent.

  1. The Thirty Years War was a war over religion rather than politics. Do you ...

    In addition D. H Pennington casts doubt on the strength of the religious motivations of both the Catholic Emperor and the Protestant rebels. He states that the emperor argued, not often convincingly, that his cause was that of Catholic rulers, and the Catholic faith everywhere.

  2. How far was the USSR responsible for the outbreak of the Cold War?

    he was unwilling to tolerate any other kind of government, even communist, unless it was controlled by the USSR. This gave way to rising tensions between the two superpowers and validated the Americans' theory of the Russian expansionist ideology. However, USSR was not only provocative in trying to establish its

  1. To what extent were germany to blame for the outbreak of ww1

    which Prussia was the most powerful, and In 1870 Prussian statesman Bismarck won a war against France. This was the start of a new and powerful German Empire: Germany took from France the important industrial area of Alsace Lorraine. The new Germany was successful in industry and by 1914 its

  2. Why did the Central Powers lose the First World War?

    The German U-Boat campaign was generally successful but created more trouble for the Germans because a new enemy emerged to fight against them, the USA, Moreover the USA entered because they knew that if the Allies lost the war there will be no chance in receiving the money lent to them back.

  1. "The main cause of the American civil war was undeniably slavery". Assess the ...

    This case increased sectionalism between north and south because the northern anti-slave fighters saw it as slavery spreading. After this event the southern extremists began to demand a change in the congressional law of the 14th amendment. Another historical legend for wrong or right reasons is Abraham Lincoln.

  2. Why did Mao Zedong introduce a second five-year plan in 1958 and to what ...

    To do this Mao introduced the 'second five year plan', which he called the 'Great Leap Forward'. When Mao received financial aid from Russia in 1950, he described this as 'getting meat out of the mouth of a tiger'. Mao knew it was dangerous but also knew it was the only way to develop China.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work