• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far do you agree that Lenins leadership was the main reason why the Bolsheviks were able to seize power?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How far do you agree that Lenin's leadership was the main reason why the Bolsheviks were able to seize power? The Bolsheviks were able to successfully seize power for many reasons. Firstly the weakness of the provisional government made it easy to take power, secondly Trotsky's careful planning made sure the take-over was executed with great efficiency and finally the return of Lenin did help to build support and encourage the Bolsheviks to seize power. The First main reason the Bolsheviks were able to seize power was the failure the Provisional Government brought on itself. It had failed miserably in solving Russia's problems. The government was unsuccessful in combating the problem of having two governments it simply undermined its own power by doing nothing to stop the Soviets, it continued to fight a war the country could not afford and that was not supported by its people and a war in which in the end Russia did badly in, plus there was a massive ...read more.

Middle

Kerensky had not only reiterated the weakness of the Provisional Government to the people but he had also freed many members of the opposing political party and armed them. This event also moved the Provisional Government more to the right meaning the Soviets moved further into the left wing. In moving further towards the left the soviet now, in Kerensky's opinion, was of little threat, he feared the right wing parties more. This meant Kerensky didn't act decisively to stop the Bolsheviks. Again these reasons that aided the Bolshevik success in seizing power had nothing to do with Lenin and so cannot be put down to his leadership. Another reason for Bolshevik success was that the Petrograd Garrison fled due to the fact they had had enough of fighting in the war and now disagreed with the Provisional Government. This meant that when the Bolsheviks and the Red Army stormed the winter palace there was no resistance they simply walked in and the few Cossacks and cadets simply left. ...read more.

Conclusion

Trotsky was the chairman of the Petrograd Soviet and had worked on a brilliantly effective plan, with him in control of the takeover it was an almost effortless seizure of power. Also the members on the central committee who were wavering over whether or not to begin a revolution and overthrow the government were convinced now was the right time and that they had a sufficiently detailed enough plan to pull it off by Lenin, without the return of Lenin and his leading of the Bolsheviks these members may not have decided to act and the revolution may never have happened. Overall I think that although Lenin's return and his subsequent leadership did to some extent play a part in the success of the Bolshevik seizure of power it was not a key part in why they gained power. The provisional Government was already experiencing problems and because of this losing support, even if Lenin hadn't returned the government would have fallen and in my opinion this is the main reason the Bolsheviks were able to seize power. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

4 star(s)

This is a clearly structured response that shows good understanding of the key events that led to the October revolution. There are many counter arguments that need to be considered more though. 4 out of 5 stars.

Marked by teacher Natalya Luck 17/09/2013

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. To what extent was Collectivisation a success?

    However, Stalin did accomplish his political aim, which was to move USSR towards Socialism and increase his power over the party and the peasants: V Brovkin said that '... It [Collectivisation] was a policy designed to strengthen the centre's control over the provinces...'

  2. Creative Writing - War.

    My hands were not untied. The first few months in captivity I spent sobbing and shouting. I hurled myself against the door on occasions. Nobody came to shut me up, only to take me to the toilet. Then, left me in silence, alone; 'You bastard Nips, come and fight me.'

  1. To what extent did the foreign intervention influence the outcome of the Spanish Civil ...

    The Republicans on the other hand, were composed of the Communists, Liberals, Republicans and Anarchists and inside the party; there were a range of political philosophies, ranging from Anarchism to Socialism to Marxism, which made the parties to be constantly disagreeing with each other.

  2. To what extent was Hitler solely responsible for the Holocaust

    all had an unfailing sense of direction and were thus forth able to find the shortest path to the Final solution. As early as 1933, laws were passed that saw Jews isolated and segregated from the rest of society, such as the Law for the Restoration of the Civil Service 1933 and the Nuremburg Laws 1935.

  1. Who was responsible for the start of the Cold war?

    the American public and they were not sure how to take Churchill's speech. As a result anti Sovietism started to seep into the American media and people were suddenly warned of the danger communism posed to their own individual liberty.

  2. Could the American War of Independence Have Been Avoided?

    forced into buying British produce which they had the ability to manufacture themselves. Finally the South which was made up of mostly rich planters, to them, the British were simply annoying, they disliked having to conform to the rule of the British government.

  1. How far were White weaknesses responsible for Red success in Russian Civil War?

    insistence of Churchill, they never actually became actively involved and put an effort into trying to fight alongside the Whites. Nonetheless, lack of political support and unity for the Whites did not end with the national groups and the Allies.

  2. How did world war II affect America ?

    As the rich people that could afford to move out went so to with the money, so shops lost a lot of business. The war also brought mixed feelings amongst people, for example there was a 'baby boom' in America after the war.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work