• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far were Maos agricultural policies responsible for the scale of the great famine between 1958-62?

Extracts from this document...


Rebecca Badminton How far were Mao?s agricultural policies responsible for the scale of the great famine between 1958-62 From 1958-62 the PRC experienced the greatest famine in the 20th century, with an estimated 45 million dying of starvation. The famine especially hit rural area?s as there lives were dependent on agriculture, and the ones who suffered from unattainable targets. Tibet also suffered with a 1/4 of the population dying as a direct result of the famine. This essay will discuss why their was a famine on such a devastating scale , who is responsible and what factors made the famine so sever. The famine was due to a combination of factors, Mao?s agricultural policies completely changed the way in which chinese people farmed. Under the PRC peasants were collectivized, land which had been seized from the landlords were joined together and large communes were created. In these communes Mao forced peasants to adopt farming methods such a lysenkoism, sparrow-cide and gave communes unachievable targets. The famine was also impacted by the inefficiency of the local government, with government officials simply looking after themselves with no thought for the people at large, setting unattainable targets for personal gain. Mao himself refused to accept or acknowledge failure which subsequently led the the scale of the famine becoming so large as by refusing to acknowledge the disaster was, as a result of his policies. ...read more.


Local officials were also responsible in allowing the famine become a disaster, at every level officials lie and exaggerated.No commune wished to admit that it had met met the targets set by Mao. Due to Mao?s rule through terror the tragedy deepened even though many government officials were aware of the fact that people were dying in there millions, they would report back to Mao that production targets were being met and the great leap forward was on course. Officials became immune to the suffering, looking after themselves without a though for the people at large. By reporting that production targets were being met the government collecting crops for urban area?s and to sell for surplus which were needed for peasants to eat. Mao also suppressed all forms of criticism, with the refusal to listen to the truth, allowing the famine to continue. At the Lushan Conference 1959, Pen dehaui spoke of what he witnessed of the peasants and famine however no one backed him to confirm the truth, showing the extent of Mao?s terror. This was because the 100 flower campaign fresh in the minds of many officials officials feared to criticize Mao, believing they would be accused of going against the state by criticizing Mao agricultural reforms it created fear to criticism Mao. Although conference was held to consider great leap forward, as delegates did not confess famine therefore nothing as done to help the situation. ...read more.


There were also economic reforms that also damaged the country and led to peasants suffering, Maos believe that by mass producing steel it would solve economic problems. Mao therefore called for all people to participate in the production of steel by building ?backyard furnaces? however, this steel was worthless and were unusable in ay practical way. Authorities knew this but dare not let on,the same way as agricultural reforms. This affected peasants as wasted steel and did not see economic problems solved. In conclusion although agricultural policies directly was a cause of the famine, with collectivization leading to private farming ceasing ,and therefore no incentive for peasants and lysenkoism decreasing the quality of produce, if Mao had directly accepted failure and tackled the problem the famine would not of grown to the extent it did. We can not however put all the blame on Mao as it was the inefficiency of local officials and government advisers who due to suppression of criticism did not accept responsibility for the peasants. Mao rule by terror, with the 100 flower campaign fresh in the minds of officials led to a ill-advised leader with delegates refusing to criticize Mao. Therefore although agricultural policies were disatorious if Mao had not created a climate of terror and fear through ruling and didn't let his refusal to accept failure get in the way of the death of million, the great famine would not of grown to the extent of 45 million deaths. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    "Asses the successes and failures of Mao's domestic policies between 1949 and 1976."

    5 star(s)

    China's second 5 year plan, the "great leap forward" was started in 1958 and ended in 1962. Unlike the first 5 year plan, the great leap forward fell far below its targets and goals. Even though the figures were hided from the people in China, the evident famine in China

  2. Marked by a teacher

    How far were Maos agricultural policies responsible for the scale of the Great Famine ...

    5 star(s)

    The Great Leap Forward, introduced in May 1958, caused a significant decrease in grain production overall which had detrimental effects on society and welfare. Mao believed that the people of China were willing to work on an ideological basis, meaning that they were self-motivated without the need for incentives to work.

  1. To what extent may the Great Leap Forward launched by Mao in 1958 be ...

    Most of these targets were achieved, notably steel production quadrupled. Mao was able to cut inflation down from 1000% to only 15% by introducing a new currency the 'Yuan'. Mao's reforms were all interlinked. He used his social reforms to back up his economic reforms.

  2. To what extend do you consider Mao's domestic policies more successful than his foreign ...

    Mao was impressed with what Lenin had accomplished with it and decided to do the same. Mao and the PRC, People Republic of China, build up the same Five Year Plan as Russia and succeeded. The National Resources Committee, NRC, had already taken care of several industrial ideas, which Mao

  1. Why did Mao Zedong introduce a second five year plan in 1958 and to ...

    His influence diminished with failure of his 1958 - 60 Great Leap Forward, but he emerged dominant again during the 1966 - 69 Cultural Revolution. Mao adapted communism to Chinese conditions as set out in the little red book. In 1945 the Japanese defeat at the hands of the USA,

  2. The Great Leap Forward - China between 1958 and 1962.

    Xiaoping worsened the situation by creating the Department of Economic Growth ((based upon the Soviet Gosplan model) which centralised directives and set even higher targets. The direct result was the over-production of poor quality goods, a virtual collapse of heavy industry through mismanagement, a malaise and a demoralisation and exhaustion of the peasant population.

  1. Why did Mao Zedong introduce a second five-year plan in 1958 and to what ...

    The output of coal increased from 63.5 million tonnes in 1952 to 124 tonnes in 1957. The output of steel also increased. It rose from 1,9 million tonnes to 5.8 million tonnes. The 'Second five year plan' was introduced in 1958 to build upon the successes of the 'first five year plan'.

  2. The Great Terror in Leningrad: a Quantitative Analysis.

    [5] The work of this broadly termed revisionist school of Western researchers, in its analysis of Soviet society and politics in the 1930s, distinguishes the more generalised purges (chistka, proverka, obmen) of the late 1920s and early 1930s from the specific events of the show trials arid accompanying mass repression of the period 1936-38.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work