• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far were the personalities of Truman and Stalin responsible for the increased tension between the USA and the Soviet Union in the years 1945-1950?

Extracts from this document...


How far were the personalities of Truman and Stalin responsible for the increased tension between the USA and the Soviet Union in the years 1945-1950? Tension increased dramatically between 1945 and 1950. Initially co-operation looked highly likely, with both the US and USSR armies demobilising, both countries suffering severe economic difficulty and America's isolationist policy. However, relations rapidly deteriorated due to documentation produced such as the Truman Doctrine and the Marshall Aid Plan, agreements made at the Yalta and Potsdam conferences (and violations of their terms) and events such as the Berlin Blockade. All of these were affected and arguably caused by the personalities of Truman and Stalin. It is widely believed, particularly amongst Revisionist historians, that the personalities of Stalin (who was ambitious, paranoid and communist) and Truman (who was capitalist and adopted an 'Iron fist' approach) were responsible for the increase in tension. However, ideological differences (Capitalism and Communism) rather than differences of personality were the most responsible for the increased tension as their personalities were merely a reflection of the systems they presided over. ...read more.


However, tension was already emerging as the Declaration on Liberated Europe alienated Russia as it was based on democracy (an American principle) and the reparations that Russia was to receive (10% of all zones) did not reflect her effort and sacrifices in the war. As the first conference was held agreements were made before Truman became President, this suggests that his personality was not to blame for the increased tension, as tension already existed and, due to the agreements made without him, was likely to increase. However, both countries violated the terms agreed in these conferences and as the decision to do this was by Stalin and Truman, which suggests that it their personalities may have been responsible to some degree. The US announced in May 1946 that the US would suspend reparation payments, which the USSR economy relied upon and violated terms previously agreed upon. The Soviets breached the Declaration on Liberated Europe through vote rigging, use of terror, delaying elections in Poland, Romania and Hungary and the 1948 coup d'�tat in Czechoslovakia. This confirmed Truman's views on Communism and acted as a catalyst for US policy becoming more assertive. ...read more.


The idea that ideological differences rather than Russia and America's leaders were to blame is further confirmed by the Chinese Revolution. The US considered themselves to be the 'guardian of China' and were their main trading partner and considered them essential for economic development. When China became communist, the US were offended and threatened, believing that China had become Communist due to Stalin's support for Mao and that it was part of Stalin's master plan for 'world domination'. To conclude, the personalities of Truman and Stalin did contribute towards the increased tension between the USA and the Soviet Union, but were the sole cause. The personalities of others besides Stalin and Truman were also arguably responsible: Historian D Donnelly emphasised how the previous President Roosevelt's optimism and weakness, as demonstrated by his failure to stand up to Stalin at the Yalta Conference, allowed Stalin to take advantage of the 'gullibility of the west'. Ultimately, the ideological differences between the two countries were responsible for the increased tension between the USA and USSR between 1945 and 1950, as the personalities of Truman and Stalin merely reflected the principles of the countries they presided over. ?? ?? ?? ?? Page 1 of 3 Marilyn Wilkinson ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Russia and the Soviet Union 1917-1924

    and knew what the people wanted * With out Lenin the Bolshevik coup would have been postponed and might of failed. * After all this the Bolshevik party's membership began to grow rapidly * Lenin's role in some historians opinions, fell short of Trotsky's Conclusion - Did he make a difference?

  2. The Wannsee Conference was entirely responsible for the Holocaust. How valid is this assessment ...

    The interpretation that the Wannsee Conference was solely responsible for the Holocaust could be considered valid if you consider the attempts that the Nazi's tried to make to get rid of the Jewish people in the early war years. One idea that suggests the National Socialists were not intending to

  1. Would you agree with the view that conflict over Berlin in the period 1945-1990 ...

    Stalin's aim for Eastern Europe was to spread communism and to create a zone of friendly governments as a defence against the West. President Truman, who disliked Stalin, saw communism as an evil force creeping across Europe and threatening countries around the world.

  2. Free essay

    Soviet Union

    Yet one and three quarter million tons of grain were exported during that period while over 5 million peasant died of starvation. Some historians have even claimed that Stalin welcomed the famine, since along with the 10 million kulaks, who were removed or executed, it helped to break peasant resistance.

  1. How far has nationalism changed over the last hundred years?

    The Fascist party planned to overthrow several towns surrounding Rome in order to cut off communications and hold a siege on the capital. The liberals feared such a movement and the king as no resistance was put forward against the notoriously violent fascists.

  2. What does the Soviet Experience provide with regard to the Institutionalisation of Ethnicity and ...

    However, the people who had recently been released from the autocratic rule of the Tsar's, wanted only one thing: self-determination and autonomy. Faced with these difficulties Lenin finally devised a formula, which would yoke the revolutionary potential of nationalism to Marxist socialism.

  1. Why was there so much mistrust between the Soviet Union and the West by ...

    His plan was to occupy a number of "satellite" states in Eastern Europe and therefore create a 'buffer' which could bear the brunt of any attack. He thought he could achieve this by bullying Truman and Attlee who were both new to their jobs and therefore probably insecure and, possibly, weak.

  2. "The Wannsee Conference was entirely responsible for the Holocaust" How valid is this assessment ...

    If the decision to build death camps had already been made and construction and indeed the process of murdering prisoners within those camps had actually begun, this significantly undermines the significance that the Wannsee Conference had on the Holocaust. However, by the beginning of 1942 in different camps fixed gas

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work