• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How important was technological innovation compared with other factors in producing allied victory in the Crimean war?

Extracts from this document...


How important was technological innovation compared with other factors in producing allied victory in the Crimean war? To answer this question fully we have to look at all the factors concerned and then ascertain the effect each had on the outcome of the war. To make this easier I have categorised the factors in to leadership and organisation, battlefield tactics, strategy and technology. The allied leadership in the Crimean war was weak and held surprisingly little commanding power over many aspects of the war. Lord Raglan, an old, inexperienced and cautious man, was the commander of the British troops. He had only acquired the position on grounds of seniority and was not the strongest of commanders. Added to the fact that Raglan was a fairly weak commander was the astonishingly low level of control he had over the war effort as a whole: the artillery, transport and naval aspects of the war all being under the control of other commanders. Raglan's weak and over cautious leadership did cause problems in the war, as often Raglan took too long to make decisions, giving the Russians time to fortify positions and regroup troops. A prime example of this cautiousness is the situation after the battle of Alma, where the allied troops waited too long to follow on the attack to Sebastopol, giving the Russians time to prepare for an assault. ...read more.


Another tactical advantage the British had in the Crimean war was the level of training of its troops. They were seasoned professionals who had been disciplined and trained to the highest level, this meant that they were much more efficient on the battlefield, using their weapons well and rarely if ever, backing down and fleeing. At the battle of Alma a ludicrously thin line of the Highland Brigade was faced by hordes of Russian, superbly disciplined the Highland Brigade advanced firing; at the time an extremely difficult manoeuvre, this was too much for the Russian troops who were forced to retreat. The heroic failure of the charge of the Light brigade also serves to show just how disciplined and committed the British soldiers were, willing to charge in to an almost certain death if ordered to. The use of effective battlefield tactics that utilised the technological advances of the time in the appropriate manner was a fairly important factor in the eventual victory of the allies, since it often gave them the upper hand in close battles. However it is important to remember that these tactics relied on the technological advantages that the allies had over the relatively primitive weapon systems of the Russian army. ...read more.


All these new features of the weapons, combined with the aforementioned expertise of the soldiers handling them, meant that the allied troops had a huge advantage over the Russians on every battlefield in the Crimea. At Balaclava for example the 93rd highlanders were deployed only in a 'thin red line' but they still managed to defeat a Russian cavalry attack with their superior firepower. This demonstrated that the infantrymen now were so well armed that they could defeat a head on cavalry attack, once the strongest form of assault. Other technological improvements such as the telegraph were being used, which meant that communication was much quicker, allowing better organisation and positioning of troops. However the Enfield rifle was the most significant technological advancement and had the biggest effect on the outcome of the Crimean war. In conclusion it seems that the advance in weaponry was the most significant factor in the allied victory of the Crimean war. However we need to acknowledge that battlefield tactics were almost equally important: without the high quality of troops and the tactics to use these weapons effectively the British may not have had such an advantage over the enemy on the field of battle. With such sophisticated weaponry being put to such skilled use it was very difficult for the Russians to get the upper hand in battle ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Battle Analysis - Dong Ap Bia (Hamburger Hill).

    The North Vietnamese had many troops in the A Shau Valley and intended to defend it with troops massing on the hills surrounding the valley. The NVA commander's demonstrated tenacity and willingness to replace heavy losses indicated he intended to put up a stiff fight for Hill 937.

  2. What factors have prompted democratisation in Argentina?

    Galtieri, as Commander-in Chief of the Army had needed support from other services in order to pull off a successful coup to oust General Roberto Viola. In his search for support, he found Anaya, the Navy chief who had a personal grudge against Viola, willing to offer the support of officers loyal to him.

  1. Was it the technological or tactical changes which had the greater influence in determining ...

    As early as the twelfth century, the cities of Flanders and northern Italy were beginning to produce foot soldiers able to defeat the best of the mounted chivalry. In 1176, it was the infantry of the Lombard League that broke the charge of Frederick Barbarossa's knights, then counter-attacked to drive the Germans from the field of Legnano.

  2. How important was technological innovation compared with other factors in producing the allied victory ...

    The media highlighted problems with logistics, which lead to public outrage, which in turn lead to some reforms. However, the military strategy used, and the actual conflicts of the war, were unaffected by the influences of the media and public opinion.

  1. The great Patriotic war - From incompetence to victory.

    This conflict and threat from Fascism was predicted as early as 1923 by Georgi Chicherin, then the people's commissar for foreign affairs, noted: "A fascist triumph in Germany could be the first step in a crusade against us."ii Hitler also publicly voiced his two other driving concerns (apart from anticommunism): race and space.

  2. How important was Stalins Leadership in relation to other factors, in accounting for the ...

    provided the USSR with essential war supplies - $11.3 billion worth of goods were sent throughout the war. Without these the army would have been less effectively supplied and progress may have been slower, particularly one the offensive move towards Berlin, which may have given the enemy more time to re-organise and build defenses.

  1. Was the Battle of the Somme the Most Significant Factor in Leading to the ...

    in the war on the Western Front as 'the Germans really faced the beginning of the end.'2 The German army was also weaker in other ways. The Somme had a deep psychological effect on the Germans, lowering their morale. It was obvious that the Germans were on the brink of defeat.

  2. How important was the war at sea

    But they did not have any bombs at first. Led to: Zeppelins were early bombing machines but they were very slow and vulnerable. 1915, 20 raids on England Led to: Better ways of preventing the bombing. Led to: Better searchlights and anti aircraft guns.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work