• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How important was technological innovation compared with other factors in producing allied victory in the Crimean war?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How important was technological innovation compared with other factors in producing allied victory in the Crimean war? To answer this question fully we have to look at all the factors concerned and then ascertain the effect each had on the outcome of the war. To make this easier I have categorised the factors in to leadership and organisation, battlefield tactics, strategy and technology. The allied leadership in the Crimean war was weak and held surprisingly little commanding power over many aspects of the war. Lord Raglan, an old, inexperienced and cautious man, was the commander of the British troops. He had only acquired the position on grounds of seniority and was not the strongest of commanders. Added to the fact that Raglan was a fairly weak commander was the astonishingly low level of control he had over the war effort as a whole: the artillery, transport and naval aspects of the war all being under the control of other commanders. Raglan's weak and over cautious leadership did cause problems in the war, as often Raglan took too long to make decisions, giving the Russians time to fortify positions and regroup troops. A prime example of this cautiousness is the situation after the battle of Alma, where the allied troops waited too long to follow on the attack to Sebastopol, giving the Russians time to prepare for an assault. ...read more.

Middle

Another tactical advantage the British had in the Crimean war was the level of training of its troops. They were seasoned professionals who had been disciplined and trained to the highest level, this meant that they were much more efficient on the battlefield, using their weapons well and rarely if ever, backing down and fleeing. At the battle of Alma a ludicrously thin line of the Highland Brigade was faced by hordes of Russian, superbly disciplined the Highland Brigade advanced firing; at the time an extremely difficult manoeuvre, this was too much for the Russian troops who were forced to retreat. The heroic failure of the charge of the Light brigade also serves to show just how disciplined and committed the British soldiers were, willing to charge in to an almost certain death if ordered to. The use of effective battlefield tactics that utilised the technological advances of the time in the appropriate manner was a fairly important factor in the eventual victory of the allies, since it often gave them the upper hand in close battles. However it is important to remember that these tactics relied on the technological advantages that the allies had over the relatively primitive weapon systems of the Russian army. ...read more.

Conclusion

All these new features of the weapons, combined with the aforementioned expertise of the soldiers handling them, meant that the allied troops had a huge advantage over the Russians on every battlefield in the Crimea. At Balaclava for example the 93rd highlanders were deployed only in a 'thin red line' but they still managed to defeat a Russian cavalry attack with their superior firepower. This demonstrated that the infantrymen now were so well armed that they could defeat a head on cavalry attack, once the strongest form of assault. Other technological improvements such as the telegraph were being used, which meant that communication was much quicker, allowing better organisation and positioning of troops. However the Enfield rifle was the most significant technological advancement and had the biggest effect on the outcome of the Crimean war. In conclusion it seems that the advance in weaponry was the most significant factor in the allied victory of the Crimean war. However we need to acknowledge that battlefield tactics were almost equally important: without the high quality of troops and the tactics to use these weapons effectively the British may not have had such an advantage over the enemy on the field of battle. With such sophisticated weaponry being put to such skilled use it was very difficult for the Russians to get the upper hand in battle ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. How important was the war at sea

    There were some people who had killed many enemies and were made heroes. 1- MANFRED VON RICHTOFEN: (The Red Baron) shot down 80 enemy planes. 2- RENE FONCK: shot down 75 enemy planes. 3- ALBERT BALL: Shot down 43 enemy planes.

  2. How important was Stalins Leadership in relation to other factors, in accounting for the ...

    Additional assistance came from U.S. Russian War Relief (a private, nonprofit organization) and the Red Cross who also sent supplies. Again, it could be suggested that it was Stalin's political ability that allowed him to form these alliances that proved to be so vital.

  1. The Prelude to the 1975 War and the Cairo Agreement.

    control over Beirut International Airport, evicted the army from West Beirut, and reestablished the Green Line partitioning the capital. The decisive defeat of the army on two key fronts led to its gradual disintegration, as demoralized soldiers defected to join the opposition.

  2. Was the Battle of the Somme the Most Significant Factor in Leading to the ...

    'The German Army suffered in the Somme battles to such an extent that... it was never again the effective fighting machine of early 1916,'1 whereas a previously amateur British army was now 'a military machine the equal of any on earth.'1 The Somme can be seen as a turning point

  1. The great Patriotic war - From incompetence to victory.

    The Nazi's and Hitler had long looked eastward to find "lebensraum", living space, for the German people. "If we speak of new land in Europe today, we can primarily have in mind only Russia and her vassal border states"`, he wrote in Mein Kampf.

  2. What part did the British navy and the war at sea play in bringing ...

    Where the British sank three German light cruisers and one destroyer in August of 1914. The British Navy followed this up by sinking the German cruiser 'Blucher' at the battle of Dogger Bank in 1915. But the only major sea battle was at Jutland in 1916 when the two great dreadnought fleets met.

  1. Battle Analysis - Dong Ap Bia (Hamburger Hill).

    Fighting on Ap Bia Mountain produced no less than five incidents of air-to-ground fratricide over a ten-day period. Pilots were unable to distinguish friend from enemy in the intense and confusing fighting around the mountain8. Both opposing forces had similar ways of gathering intelligence.

  2. What factors have prompted democratisation in Argentina?

    The transitional phase of the Political-Institutional model suggests that the initiation of a transition towards democracy lies in the cohesion and strength of the governing elites, as well as actors from within the opposition bring about a 'societal revolution.'5 This reference point shall be used to investigate the external and domestic factors leading to the demise of Galtieri's junta.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work