• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How important was technological innovation compared with other factors in producing allied victory in the Crimean war?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How important was technological innovation compared with other factors in producing allied victory in the Crimean war? To answer this question fully we have to look at all the factors concerned and then ascertain the effect each had on the outcome of the war. To make this easier I have categorised the factors in to leadership and organisation, battlefield tactics, strategy and technology. The allied leadership in the Crimean war was weak and held surprisingly little commanding power over many aspects of the war. Lord Raglan, an old, inexperienced and cautious man, was the commander of the British troops. He had only acquired the position on grounds of seniority and was not the strongest of commanders. Added to the fact that Raglan was a fairly weak commander was the astonishingly low level of control he had over the war effort as a whole: the artillery, transport and naval aspects of the war all being under the control of other commanders. Raglan's weak and over cautious leadership did cause problems in the war, as often Raglan took too long to make decisions, giving the Russians time to fortify positions and regroup troops. A prime example of this cautiousness is the situation after the battle of Alma, where the allied troops waited too long to follow on the attack to Sebastopol, giving the Russians time to prepare for an assault. ...read more.

Middle

Another tactical advantage the British had in the Crimean war was the level of training of its troops. They were seasoned professionals who had been disciplined and trained to the highest level, this meant that they were much more efficient on the battlefield, using their weapons well and rarely if ever, backing down and fleeing. At the battle of Alma a ludicrously thin line of the Highland Brigade was faced by hordes of Russian, superbly disciplined the Highland Brigade advanced firing; at the time an extremely difficult manoeuvre, this was too much for the Russian troops who were forced to retreat. The heroic failure of the charge of the Light brigade also serves to show just how disciplined and committed the British soldiers were, willing to charge in to an almost certain death if ordered to. The use of effective battlefield tactics that utilised the technological advances of the time in the appropriate manner was a fairly important factor in the eventual victory of the allies, since it often gave them the upper hand in close battles. However it is important to remember that these tactics relied on the technological advantages that the allies had over the relatively primitive weapon systems of the Russian army. ...read more.

Conclusion

All these new features of the weapons, combined with the aforementioned expertise of the soldiers handling them, meant that the allied troops had a huge advantage over the Russians on every battlefield in the Crimea. At Balaclava for example the 93rd highlanders were deployed only in a 'thin red line' but they still managed to defeat a Russian cavalry attack with their superior firepower. This demonstrated that the infantrymen now were so well armed that they could defeat a head on cavalry attack, once the strongest form of assault. Other technological improvements such as the telegraph were being used, which meant that communication was much quicker, allowing better organisation and positioning of troops. However the Enfield rifle was the most significant technological advancement and had the biggest effect on the outcome of the Crimean war. In conclusion it seems that the advance in weaponry was the most significant factor in the allied victory of the Crimean war. However we need to acknowledge that battlefield tactics were almost equally important: without the high quality of troops and the tactics to use these weapons effectively the British may not have had such an advantage over the enemy on the field of battle. With such sophisticated weaponry being put to such skilled use it was very difficult for the Russians to get the upper hand in battle ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. How important was Stalins Leadership in relation to other factors, in accounting for the ...

    However, for the supplies from the Red Cross and Russian war relief he cannot be accredited and it could be argued that the allies did not aid Russia due to Stalin's diplomacy but merely in an attempt to defeat Germany.

  2. The great Patriotic war - From incompetence to victory.

    The West did nothing. That same year Great Britain signed a sea treaty with Germany, allowing the Germans a navy - another violation. In 1936, Mussolini invaded Abyssinia and Germany occupied the Rhineland. The West did nothing. Why did the West do nothing and why did this disturb Russia?

  1. What factors have prompted democratisation in Argentina?

    He did this by having his Interior Minister, General Albano Eduardo Harguindeguy meet with senior members of the UCR7, the Radical party, as well as relatively minor members of the PJ8, the Per´┐Żnists. The problem was that the military leaders were concerned with the issue of presidential succession, and this division caused the talks to become less and less relevant.

  2. The Prelude to the 1975 War and the Cairo Agreement.

    with Arafat's command, some within the PLO ranks wanted an investigation into the disastrous plans and command structure during the fighting. Syria was also concerned with Arafat's political gestures towards other Arab states and even the United States. Syria worried about being sidelined by a potential Jordanian-Arafat alliance and was

  1. Was it the technological or tactical changes which had the greater influence in determining ...

    As early as the twelfth century, the cities of Flanders and northern Italy were beginning to produce foot soldiers able to defeat the best of the mounted chivalry. In 1176, it was the infantry of the Lombard League that broke the charge of Frederick Barbarossa's knights, then counter-attacked to drive the Germans from the field of Legnano.

  2. Was the Battle of the Somme the Most Significant Factor in Leading to the ...

    They had to concede defeat. The Somme was instrumental in this chain of events that led to the German defeat. A crucial point in the war on the Western Front after the Somme is that the German and British armies had greatly changed during the course of the Somme.

  1. How important was the war at sea

    But they did not have any bombs at first. Led to: Zeppelins were early bombing machines but they were very slow and vulnerable. 1915, 20 raids on England Led to: Better ways of preventing the bombing. Led to: Better searchlights and anti aircraft guns.

  2. Battle Analysis - Dong Ap Bia (Hamburger Hill).

    Both opposing forces had similar ways of gathering intelligence. Since the Americans could not see through the triple-canopy jungle, the U.S. aircraft could not report any intelligence. Intel was gathered by means of small patrols and forward observers. The NVA would sneak behind enemy lines during the night to attack and to also conduct reconnaissance missions.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work