• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How united was Italy after 1861?

Extracts from this document...


Jonathan Clay How united was Italy after 1861? The idea of unification can be expressed in two different ways. The Italy can be unified geographically or in a national sense. However, in 1861 Italy seemed to be neither of these. The kingdom of Italy was created in 1861 but Italy as a geographical expression was still incomplete. However, the only two states not included in the kingdom of Italy were Venetia and Rome. This was the case after garibaldi successfully conquered Sicily and the south of Italy, but at the same time Cavour travelled done from Piedmont with an army to stop Garibaldi but joined and practically united the kingdom of Italy. At this time Rome seemed to be more of a priority than Venetia. This is because Cavour hoped that he could persuade Napoleon to withdraw from Rome thus enabling the 'united' Italy to control Rome. However, Venetia seemed less likely at this point since it would undoubtedly lead to war against Austria. In 1862 Garibaldi decided to gather volunteers and march on Rome. He had support from the Prime minister (Rattazi) ...read more.


Venetia was then handed over in October (via Napoleon III). However, as Victor Emmanuel pointed out after this Italian fortune that Italy was made but incomplete. Presumably this is referring to the absence of Rome from the Kingdom of Italy. In the autumn of 1867 Garibaldi almost perpetuated his former actions with an unsuccessful attempt at seizing Rome. This was once again backed by Rattazzi until he distanced himself from the cause after worries over the political repercussions. Unfortunately for Garibaldi his force was once again stopped but by French and Papal forces. Three years later in 1870, Rome was owned by Italy. This was mainly due to the Franco-Prussian war, which took place after relations worsened between the two nations. At the beginning Victor Emmanuel took a neutral standpoint, but began to prepare troops after napoleon began withdrawing his troops in August. The defeat of the French at the Battle of Sedan on 2nd September caused the removal of the Emperor and the collapse of the Empire. Subsequently, 50,000 Italian troops invaded Rome and the Vatican; they outnumbered the 15,000 papal troops defending Rome. It was only on 20th September that Pius IX gave up to prevent bloodshed. ...read more.


The squabble between The North and the South of Italy was always inevitable. The North had more fertile soil and was far more prosperous economically than the South. Furthermore, the South was underrepresented in the Statuto that was naturally a Piedmontese institution. There was also a deep filled rivalry between the two parts of Italy that these stereotypes would simply be perpetuated in states of government (in terms of the North's opinion of the South). Italy required political and administrative centralisation if you were following utilitarianism. However, this seemed impractical since most of the nations wealth and population was in the North of Italy and so needed more representation. In truth Italy was unified as a geographical expression but each state previously had self-control and so even it became unified, Italy would still be a nation compiled from nations. As a result, it would always be difficult for Italy to become a national and political entity, as there would always be barriers of opinion according to region. However, the fact that Italy stayed as a single nation since shows that Italy was in the process of being unified. This proves that in this case geographical unity is far more instantaneous than national unity. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. What had Garibaldi contributed to Italian Unification by 1861

    Northern Italy had the advantage of rivers, a fertile climate and trade links to the important economic powers of the Industrial age whilst the south was arid and had links only to the Mediterranean and so was relatively poor.

  2. Why did the war against Austria in 1859 result in the unification of most ...

    On one hand, the settlement seemed to contribute to the eventual unification of Italy because it was agreed that Piedmont would receive Lombardy. Despite the fact that, it had to first had to be ceded to France to be passed by Napoleon to Victor Emmanuel, just to save Austria any humiliation.

  1. Why did the Franco-Prussian war happen and why were the Prussians able to defeat ...

    asks William I to agree never to renew the candidature of a Prussian on the Spanish throne, William rejects this and believes it threatens his honour. This in my opinion begins to light the fuse of the Franco-Prussian war because before this event French and Prussian relations were becoming more

  2. Facist Italy by John Whittam - review

    Rather, Fascism was anti-capitalist, anti-Marxist, and anti-intellectual. Fascism was considered a party of action and mass political movement. Fascism represented action. The movement was considered revolutionary because it was a complete overthrow of traditional society. The main emphasis was placed on nationalism; the belief that nations will benefit from acting independently rather than collectively, stressing national rather than international goals.

  1. Who was more responsible for the success of Italian Unification up to 1861? Cavour, ...

    many of whose valiant sons have been killed or maimed for the cause of Italy." Therefore we have to understand that Napoleon was a key piece in the puzzle and without him Unification might have not happened in such a short period of time.

  2. How and why was most of Italy unified by 1861?

    This gave Orzini an excuse to get involved in the war. In July 1858 Cavour was invited to meet Napoleon at Plombieres. It took place in great secrecy. Cavour wrote to Victor Emmanuel II giving his version of the discussion.

  1. Fascist Italy

    OBEY! FIGHT!" painted on walls. Newspapers and radio were controlled by the MINCULPOP who insisted that editorials and news stories reflected their views and passing whims. Reporters were instructed on what to omit, what to highlight and even what photographs to use.

  2. Bismarck up until 1861.

    His parentage was a contradiction in its self. His father was a traditional Junker, serving in the Prussian army but leaving at 23. He ran his estate poorly and ran into difficulties. He had not influence in the Prussian state to speak of.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work