• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How united was Italy after 1861?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Jonathan Clay How united was Italy after 1861? The idea of unification can be expressed in two different ways. The Italy can be unified geographically or in a national sense. However, in 1861 Italy seemed to be neither of these. The kingdom of Italy was created in 1861 but Italy as a geographical expression was still incomplete. However, the only two states not included in the kingdom of Italy were Venetia and Rome. This was the case after garibaldi successfully conquered Sicily and the south of Italy, but at the same time Cavour travelled done from Piedmont with an army to stop Garibaldi but joined and practically united the kingdom of Italy. At this time Rome seemed to be more of a priority than Venetia. This is because Cavour hoped that he could persuade Napoleon to withdraw from Rome thus enabling the 'united' Italy to control Rome. However, Venetia seemed less likely at this point since it would undoubtedly lead to war against Austria. In 1862 Garibaldi decided to gather volunteers and march on Rome. He had support from the Prime minister (Rattazi) ...read more.

Middle

Venetia was then handed over in October (via Napoleon III). However, as Victor Emmanuel pointed out after this Italian fortune that Italy was made but incomplete. Presumably this is referring to the absence of Rome from the Kingdom of Italy. In the autumn of 1867 Garibaldi almost perpetuated his former actions with an unsuccessful attempt at seizing Rome. This was once again backed by Rattazzi until he distanced himself from the cause after worries over the political repercussions. Unfortunately for Garibaldi his force was once again stopped but by French and Papal forces. Three years later in 1870, Rome was owned by Italy. This was mainly due to the Franco-Prussian war, which took place after relations worsened between the two nations. At the beginning Victor Emmanuel took a neutral standpoint, but began to prepare troops after napoleon began withdrawing his troops in August. The defeat of the French at the Battle of Sedan on 2nd September caused the removal of the Emperor and the collapse of the Empire. Subsequently, 50,000 Italian troops invaded Rome and the Vatican; they outnumbered the 15,000 papal troops defending Rome. It was only on 20th September that Pius IX gave up to prevent bloodshed. ...read more.

Conclusion

The squabble between The North and the South of Italy was always inevitable. The North had more fertile soil and was far more prosperous economically than the South. Furthermore, the South was underrepresented in the Statuto that was naturally a Piedmontese institution. There was also a deep filled rivalry between the two parts of Italy that these stereotypes would simply be perpetuated in states of government (in terms of the North's opinion of the South). Italy required political and administrative centralisation if you were following utilitarianism. However, this seemed impractical since most of the nations wealth and population was in the North of Italy and so needed more representation. In truth Italy was unified as a geographical expression but each state previously had self-control and so even it became unified, Italy would still be a nation compiled from nations. As a result, it would always be difficult for Italy to become a national and political entity, as there would always be barriers of opinion according to region. However, the fact that Italy stayed as a single nation since shows that Italy was in the process of being unified. This proves that in this case geographical unity is far more instantaneous than national unity. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Why did the Franco-Prussian war happen and why were the Prussians able to defeat ...

    find the men with enough talent and experience to become competent officers without them the French army was nothing more than a "large, undisciplined, enthusiastically patriotic mob" (Stiles p91), officers are key to victory, in my opinion, a mob is no more of an army than a pile of bricks is house.

  2. Who was more responsible for the success of Italian Unification up to 1861? Cavour, ...

    Garibaldi hoists the Italian Tricolour above Sicily to show his loyalty to Victor Emmanuel and also implements Piedmontese law in order to prepare the country for the unification with the North. Garibaldi then moved onto the mainland where he continued with his success.

  1. How and why was most of Italy unified by 1861?

    This gave Orzini an excuse to get involved in the war. In July 1858 Cavour was invited to meet Napoleon at Plombieres. It took place in great secrecy. Cavour wrote to Victor Emmanuel II giving his version of the discussion.

  2. Why did the war against Austria in 1859 result in the unification of most ...

    cut the war short at seven weeks and call a truce with Austria. He met with Franz Joseph at Villafranca, without consulting Cavour. They met at Villafranca as a signal of the end of the war. Because Piedmont had sent Piedmontese troops to fight, Piedmont was invited to the treaty held at Zurich.

  1. Facist Italy by John Whittam - review

    of Italy during the war were key in Mussolini's period of influence. Mussolini was able to counteract or create illusions to the problems that the society of Italy faced. Fascism had no unified ideology and it was not anti-semantic. Rather, Fascism was anti-capitalist, anti-Marxist, and anti-intellectual.

  2. Fascist Italy

    OBEY! FIGHT!" painted on walls. Newspapers and radio were controlled by the MINCULPOP who insisted that editorials and news stories reflected their views and passing whims. Reporters were instructed on what to omit, what to highlight and even what photographs to use.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work