• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"In its intervention in South East Asia in the years 1950-1964, the USA was more concerned with defending its economic, than its ideological, interests"

Extracts from this document...


"In its intervention in South East Asia in the years 1950-1964, the USA was more concerned with defending its economic, than its ideological, interests" The Cold War is infamous as an ideological battle ground, in relation to American beliefs, the clashes of ideology could be seen to an extent as economic in nature; communism Vs capitalism and thus the two reasons are inextricably linked. Yet as America's longest war, it follows that the conflict was a complicated one. The contributing factors of American involvement changed as the war progressed. The initial reasons the U.S.A became involved were not the reasons that kept them there over 15 years later and thus the reasons America entered Vietnam changed over time. America primarily became involved out of fear of communism and the domino effect, having 'lost' china to communism, and observing the U.S.S.R as a monolithic threat, the U.S believed they could not afford to allow another area in the region to turn communist. ...read more.


Truman did not want to appear 'soft' on communism. And so the original reason for entering the conflict was the polarised ideologies and a matter of geopolitics combined with fear, paranoia and the need to not look weak on the world diplomatic stage. Yet to an extent the intervention in Vietnam was economically motivated as Kolko believed; Eisenhower himself stated in 1954 that South East Asia should not be lost due to the wealth of natural resources there such as tungsten and rubber If the nation became communist America could then not trade with them, and so would not have access to these resources. Japan was also of key importance as an area of trade; coined 'the rice bowl of Asia' the island had an American base and would be a large blow to America if it became communist. America had also poured millions of dollars worth of money into the Vietnamese and South East Asian economy in a bid to stop the conditions which they believed cause communism. ...read more.


This began as early as the 1950s; after deciding not to support the decisions made at Geneva and splitting Vietnam literally down the 17th parallel, America were committed to upholding and maintaining the situation they had helped create, withdrawing aid and advisement would make the nation look weak and unfair, as Westmoreland later stated they had become 'Morally locked into Vietnam'. This idea of being morally accountable progressed the further in America got, the more troops that were sent, the more damage, the more lives lost and the worse America would seem internationally. No president wanted to be seen as the one who 'lost Vietnam' and so the quagmire theory has been propounded by many historians; each president was obligated by the actions of those before him and this graduated commitment made it harder to get out of the 'quagmire'. Prestige and credibility played a huge role, not only international but within their own country. Domestic pressure International pressure Fear of embarrassment Situation by 1964 conclusion ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level History of the USA, 1840-1968 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level History of the USA, 1840-1968 essays

  1. Was it domestic pressures or events in Asia which caused US intervention in Korea?

    Due to the fact that America had failed to help the nationalists in China, it meant they had to redeem themselves and the main way they could do this was by stopping the Soviets from spreading communism any further. Japan also had a major part to play in why the US intervened in Korea.

  2. How and why did Eisenhower increased commitment to Vietnam

    be long before other South East Asian countries would follow and that it 'will go over very quickly'. When the French asked for US air strike, Eisenhower gave the request a serious consideration. Like many US presidents before him, he really did believe Vietnam was important and insisted that 'we must not lose Asia'.

  1. Revision notes - the USA 1945 to 1980

    There was much intimidation of blacks at this time. Bombings, burnings and shootings were tried to stop the boycott. In 1956 the supreme court declared segregation on the busses to be illegal After this decision more and more groups were formed to began to use this form of protest.

  2. Comparison of Presidents Harry Truman, Dwight Eisenhower and Lyndon Johnson

    When the governor of Arkansas ordered state troops to keep nine black students from entering a previously all-white school in Little Rock, Eisenhower took control of the state troops and sent 1,000 federal troops in to protect them. This action showed the states that Eisenhower was serious about enforcing the

  1. Assess the reasons why American military intervention in Vietnam increased from 1954

    Between 1953 and 1957 over $1 billion of US economic and military aid was put into South Vietnam but Diem failed to achieve stability in a confused Vietnam. Much of the problem rested with Diem himself, a vain and corrupt leader whose rule was characterised by nepotism, persecution of certain religions, bribery, corruption and a lack of reform.

  2. Why did the US get involved in Vietnam in 1965?

    Americans believe that they go round helping out other countries out of the kindness of their heart, like in Korea. So now they feel that it is South Vietnam who are in need of help and the way they can help them in by invading North Vietnam, so they did exactly that.

  1. Assess the importance of the President in the expansion of the USA from 1815-1917

    Therefore, President Jackson was important in the expansion of the USA because his Removal Act led to gains in land and resources. However it can be argued that it wasn?t solely President Jackson?s actions that led to Indian Removal. The discovery of gold in the Cherokee Indian?s land in Georgia

  2. 'Johnson alone bears the responsibility for the escalation of war in Vietnam in the ...

    . .We could pave the whole country and put parking strips on it, and still be home by Christmas.? So LBJ has to show that the USA doesn?t stand for communism and that they are efficient. So many people expected a short war, over in months.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work