• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

In this assignment, I will use my knowledge of the Vietnamese war and my Source skills to explain to what extent the Sources are useful in explaining why the USA became involved in Vietnam.

Extracts from this document...


In this assignment, I will use my knowledge of the Vietnamese war and my Source skills to explain to what extent the Sources are useful in explaining why the USA became involved in Vietnam. Source A showed that President Johnson had indeed put on a front concerning Vietnam, he stated that the US where in Vietnam as they had a promise in 1954, to do so when Johnson had signed an agreement at the Geneva Convention with the UN and NATO. Moreover the US was trying to strengthen world order and to stop the spread of communism as, they believed that when one influential country succumbed to communist ways, then surrounding countries would follow (The Domino Theory). This is evident in line 7 - "The result would be instability and unrest." With the President of the USA being the author, he obviously knew everything about the war; also President Johnson was a key figure in the conflict. Source A is useful as it reinforces what I already know about the Vietnam War. The information gathered in Source A is backed up in Source B and both mention communism - however, in Source A there is no clear example of it. Source A, although useful is biased, as the President mentions nothing bad about the USA. As I mentioned earlier, it is apparent that President Johnson blocked out the official truth. ...read more.


Source B reinforces the guerrilla Warfare of the Vietcong and the successes. The content in Source C strongly agrees with that of Source B, as, in B, the President is stating his personal beliefs which are true, together with the statement of Noam Chomsky, whilst it is clear that, in fact Source A held little or no truth at all. Although Source B is useful, but it has its limitations, as Johnson was talking in a private conversation; therefore I would expect that it would not be very biased. Unfortunately, to leave it as it stands would be too vague. From my point of view, I can't help but assume that the whole conversation was planned and I feel that President Johnson knew quite well that the American public would soon find out what was really happening, although there is no mention as to whom the President was talking to. I would have to say that the Source holds lots of detail and President Johnson knew that they (America) were fighting a war they knew very little about. Again, it seemed that President Johnson thought America would be successful, but now, he could not find a reasonable answer as to why they are there. The Source was written in May 1964, a year before Operation Rolling Thunder, which proves to me that America was failing long before they even started, long before Operation Rolling Thunder. ...read more.


This Source is very critical, but does hold a lot of detail towards the issue itself and I am unable to gather any background knowledge as to whether or not Professor Noam Chomsky was involved in the topic. Chomsky was being interviewed in 1982 - long after the war, therefore his comments would not have had an affect on the people who were involved in the War. I question his reliability. This particular Source was written in 1982 and Chomsky has all the evidence of the failings and commented extremely well with regards to such things. Source C does not compare with Source A at all, but Source B hints. They both gave a negative view on the issue as to why America where involved in Vietnam. Finally, Chomsky stated that the USA did not want South Vietnam to prosper. I couldn't disagree more and by using background knowledge, I can safely say that, in-fact, the USA was helping the South Vietnamese to prosper by aiding them with money. In conclusion, although Professor Noam Chomsky was a critic, he made many valid comments about America being in Vietnam. He showed that the American public, including Johnson, felt the involvement was a waste of time, effort, money and most importantly the lives of the young soldiers that were sent there. In the end, what actually was accomplished by America's involvement? It seems to me that is was a war that ended without just settlement and highlighted the fact that political desire showed no respect for political correctness or responsibility. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Explain why America became increasingly involved in the affairs of Vietnam

    3 star(s)

    The US jets were ordered to attack North Vietnamese torpedo boat bases and about 25 of these were destroyed. Johnson knew that there had been no second attack. Two or three days later he told an official. 'Hell, those dumb, stupid sailors were just shooting at flying fish.'

  2. To what extent can it be argued that the use of guerilla warfare tactics ...

    Many of the ensuing images were used for propaganda for both America and Northern forces. Some believe that the American and North Vietnamese governments put many of the photographers there for propagandistic purposes9, trying to capture images that best portrayed the brutality of the opposing force.

  1. What can you learn from Source A about the reasons for US involvement in ...

    Use the sources, and your own knowledge, to explain whether you agree with this view. I agree with this view expressed in Source M because, television had an immediate impact. As soon as something happened in Vietnam, it was relayed back to the USA and put straight on to the television.

  2. Cross-referencing of Sources (3.3.2) Vietnam

    He wrote this message in order to expose how bad the Vietnamese were treated by the U.S troops. This is a primary source as the journalist wrote this while these horrific events were happening. Also the message has been told by the people who actually were there at the time.

  1. To what extent can it be argued that the use of guerilla warfare tactics ...

    Provide a source for this claim. But what was so horrible about the war that led these young men to such extreme measures? First of all very little progress ever seemed to be made which was disconcerting to all involved.

  2. Why did a gangster culture develop in the USA in the 1920`s to the ...

    He was born in New York and was the fourth oldest of nine children. He was known as a brutal Neapolitan mobster from the younger generation, who became a powerful force in the Sicilian-American Mafia and is therefore important for the question why the Mafia could rise in America.

  1. Why did the USA become involved in Vietnam in the 1950s and 1960s?

    President Nixon was the first American president to visit Beijing. Nixon had abandoned the Truman doctrine. The United States were no longer so concerned about the spread of communism because the American Public and it's government were tired of seeing so many of their young men get killed for the sake of another country.

  2. The aim of this essay is to evaluate if the end of the Cold ...

    One of the major theories is Realism, realists look at international politics as an anarchic environment created by a missing overall political authority which produces a competitive environment where states seek to maintain their own sovereignty. Realists place emphasis on nation states as the principal actors in international politics stating

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work