• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

In this assignment, I will use my knowledge of the Vietnamese war and my Source skills to explain to what extent the Sources are useful in explaining why the USA became involved in Vietnam.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

In this assignment, I will use my knowledge of the Vietnamese war and my Source skills to explain to what extent the Sources are useful in explaining why the USA became involved in Vietnam. Source A showed that President Johnson had indeed put on a front concerning Vietnam, he stated that the US where in Vietnam as they had a promise in 1954, to do so when Johnson had signed an agreement at the Geneva Convention with the UN and NATO. Moreover the US was trying to strengthen world order and to stop the spread of communism as, they believed that when one influential country succumbed to communist ways, then surrounding countries would follow (The Domino Theory). This is evident in line 7 - "The result would be instability and unrest." With the President of the USA being the author, he obviously knew everything about the war; also President Johnson was a key figure in the conflict. Source A is useful as it reinforces what I already know about the Vietnam War. The information gathered in Source A is backed up in Source B and both mention communism - however, in Source A there is no clear example of it. Source A, although useful is biased, as the President mentions nothing bad about the USA. As I mentioned earlier, it is apparent that President Johnson blocked out the official truth. ...read more.

Middle

Source B reinforces the guerrilla Warfare of the Vietcong and the successes. The content in Source C strongly agrees with that of Source B, as, in B, the President is stating his personal beliefs which are true, together with the statement of Noam Chomsky, whilst it is clear that, in fact Source A held little or no truth at all. Although Source B is useful, but it has its limitations, as Johnson was talking in a private conversation; therefore I would expect that it would not be very biased. Unfortunately, to leave it as it stands would be too vague. From my point of view, I can't help but assume that the whole conversation was planned and I feel that President Johnson knew quite well that the American public would soon find out what was really happening, although there is no mention as to whom the President was talking to. I would have to say that the Source holds lots of detail and President Johnson knew that they (America) were fighting a war they knew very little about. Again, it seemed that President Johnson thought America would be successful, but now, he could not find a reasonable answer as to why they are there. The Source was written in May 1964, a year before Operation Rolling Thunder, which proves to me that America was failing long before they even started, long before Operation Rolling Thunder. ...read more.

Conclusion

This Source is very critical, but does hold a lot of detail towards the issue itself and I am unable to gather any background knowledge as to whether or not Professor Noam Chomsky was involved in the topic. Chomsky was being interviewed in 1982 - long after the war, therefore his comments would not have had an affect on the people who were involved in the War. I question his reliability. This particular Source was written in 1982 and Chomsky has all the evidence of the failings and commented extremely well with regards to such things. Source C does not compare with Source A at all, but Source B hints. They both gave a negative view on the issue as to why America where involved in Vietnam. Finally, Chomsky stated that the USA did not want South Vietnam to prosper. I couldn't disagree more and by using background knowledge, I can safely say that, in-fact, the USA was helping the South Vietnamese to prosper by aiding them with money. In conclusion, although Professor Noam Chomsky was a critic, he made many valid comments about America being in Vietnam. He showed that the American public, including Johnson, felt the involvement was a waste of time, effort, money and most importantly the lives of the young soldiers that were sent there. In the end, what actually was accomplished by America's involvement? It seems to me that is was a war that ended without just settlement and highlighted the fact that political desire showed no respect for political correctness or responsibility. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. To what extent can it be argued that the use of guerilla warfare tactics ...

    In 1968 the CIA introduced a system code-named 'Operation Phoenix'7 whereby tens of thousands of expected VC were sought out and interrogated few of which were said to come out alive. Methods of torture included the insertion of a six-inch length of dowel into a detainee's ear and then tapping

  2. Evaluation of key sources to address the question of increased tension

    But what was the outcome of such great involvement? A glorious victory? No. As source B5 Describes the Viet Cong had 'won control of much of South Vietnam.' Source B5 is an extract from the book 'The Hutchinson History of the World' by JM Roberts in 1976. The extract is really a statement of what Kennedy did.

  1. What can you learn from Source A about the reasons for US involvement in ...

    society' that had hardly any of the weapons or technology that the USA had. People wondered why the USA was losing a war against such a small country, especially when they had never lost a war previously. Another reason related to this, was the huge amount of money going into the war effort.

  2. How Useful are Sources A-C to explain why the United States became involved in ...

    measures like sending troops to a tight foreign war, until after the 1964 presidential elections. Johnson's belief that the bombing raid on North Vietnam in August, 1964, would persuade Ho Chi Minh to cut off all aid to the NLF was unfounded.

  1. The Prelude to the 1975 War and the Cairo Agreement.

    Reaction to the Syrian invasion was mixed. Camille Chamoun and Pierre Gemayel did not object to the Syrian move and it was rumoured that the Lebanese Front militias were down to their last 72 hours of ammunition and were on the verge of total defeat.

  2. How useful are sources A to C to explain why the United States became ...

    Johnson has introduced an element of fear by saying that if they hadn't gone into war against Vietnam, 'the result would be instability and unrest, and even wider war.' The American public would still be recovering from and remembering the devastating effects of the Second World War and they desperately

  1. Vietnam Assignment – History Sources Question

    "Their was no Vietcong territory to invade and conquer... they (US) could never claim to have advanced so many kilometres" and because of this were unable to brag bout how well they where getting on to their citizens enticing more to join up. America also had the wrong tactics from the offset "...because the battle was in their own country the Vietcong could afford to wait years for victory...

  2. The aim of this essay is to evaluate if the end of the Cold ...

    The other theory by liberalism however questions the sole dominance of the nation states explaining that it is possible to have peace and cooperation in international politics (Richardson, 1997).Liberalism admits the sovereignty of states but also emphasises the importance of other non-state actors and their roles in international politics.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work