• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Is there sufficient evidence in sources A to F to explain why there was an anti-war movement in the United States during the late 1960s and early 1970s?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

MODEL B:ASSIGNMENT:VIETNAM Robert Nelson 11H Is there sufficient evidence in sources A to F to explain why there was an anti-war movement in the United States during the late 1960s and early 1970s? As the Vietnam war heavily covered by the media, the devastating images were broadcasted across the globe. People were able to watch the war from their armchair and many American people were disgraced by the images of children dying and innocent people being shot dead in villages. A perfect example of this, is the My Lai massacre which took place in 1968. The images appalled people all over the world, especially American people who felt ashamed of their country's soldiers. 'Middle America' began to realise the harsh consequences of the Vietnam War. I believe that the media coverage sparked the protesting across America, however there were individual groups who protested against the war, they all had different beliefs about the war and had different methods of protesting, but they all had one thing in common, they wanted to stop the war in Vietnam. Hippies, blacks, students and veterans were amongst these groups of protesters. I will use the sources, with the aid of my own knowledge in order to attempt to come up with an answer to why there was an anti-war movement in the United States during the late 1960s and early 1970s. ...read more.

Middle

Source B, is a photograph of napalm victims during the Vietnam War. This source shows how extensive the media coverage was on the Vietnam war. This photograph shows child victims of napalm. These images were shocking to American people, they did not expect that innocent children would be the victims of chemical warfare. 'middle American' was under the impression that the war was being won, stooping so low to harm children changed many minds. I know that hippies were strongly opposed to the use of chemical and biological weapons. Therefore I would say that this source does explain the protest against the Vietnam War in America. Source C, was written by Richard Hamer, an American journalist. In his article, he speaks of the difficulty of fighting in the jungle. This source tells me many problems that the U.S soldiers faced. "You walk down a road between rice paddies. Vietnamese are in every paddy." The soldiers were always outsmarted by the tactics of the Vietcong, they were very intelligent and had a great advantage due to their knowledge of the terrain. "Should you kill all of them or none of them". This was a major problem for U.S soldiers, if there was a suspect Vietcong amongst a group of people they would be in a difficult position as their aim was to kill any Vietcong in sight. ...read more.

Conclusion

The horrific images would have been captured on camera and shown on television. American people would see the harsh reality of the war. The colour television really brings the war to life, people can witness events as if they were five yards away from it, which meant that the American government could no longer lie about the duties that American soldiers carried out. This caused 'middle America' to lose trust in the government and they just wanted the war to be stopped. This source provides sufficient evidence to explain why there was an anti-war protest in America. The images were seen by all different kinds of people throughout America and the images caused huge protest amongst many groups and 'middle America' From evaluating the sources, and using my own knowledge, I am able to conclude that they do not give sufficient evidence to explain why there was an anti-war movement in the United States during the late 1960s and early 1970s. The sources do not give enough information, they do not show how particular groups react to events. For example none of the sources mention how hippies reacted to the use of chemical weapons, or how black people protested about being sent to Vietnam. The sources do give some evidence to explain why there was protesting, however, there is definitely not sufficient evidence to explain the anti-war movement during this period. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Cross-referencing of Sources (3.3.2) Vietnam

    This shows the U.S lost the trust that their own civilians had for them. The sickened American people started to question why America had to be involved in a war, which didn't have anything to do with America. Source C suggests even when the U.S had a lot force and

  2. I will be looking at how the U.S became increasingly involved Vietnam, the problems ...

    Part of this increased aggression included Operation Rolling Thunder. Launched on the 7th February 1967 it involved extensive bombing raids on military and industrial targets in North Vietnam. This air offensive would last until 1972, and its list of targets eventually included towns in North and South Vietnam. One of its main targets was the Ho Chi Minh trail, which supplied the Viet Cong with supplies from the North.

  1. Why was there a Sino-Soviet split by the late 1960s?

    These clashes were continual and never-ending, China wanted what the USSR was keen to avoid, and the USSR wanted what China saw as a personal attempt to thwart their ambitions, and consequently relations deteriorated. Mutual interests, it appeared, were confined to their shared 'ideology', a loosely employed term because as discussed previously, communism took on different meanings for different countries.

  2. Why did the United States become involved in Vietnam in the 1950's and 1960's?

    They were claiming to be in Vietnam only to train South Vietnamese troops but in reality they took part in combat just like soldiers. Lyndon Johnson was Kennedy's successor as President of the U.S.A. he believed in the "Domino Theory" however he was reluctant to keep pouring money into South Vietnam.

  1. Why did the USA pursue a policy of detente in the early 1970's?

    It's transformation into a super power and the role of international policeman that came with it had severely tested the American economy. America had provided huge amounts of financial aid to many countries across the globe hoping to stop the communist domino effect.

  2. Why did the USA become involved in Vietnam in the 1950s and 1960s?

    So, this was why there were so many different reactions in the US to the Vietnam War. Every one of those 200 million people were different and had different ideas about war in general and this particular war against communism.

  1. Does Source C show that the anti-war protests described in Source A had an ...

    Source J is the most informative source and if we can trust it, we can learn from it the soldier's views on the tasks they were given in Vietnam. We learn that they did not approve of their methods and they felt guilt and remorse for the families and innocents they had murdered.

  2. How Useful are Sources A to C to Explain Why the United States Became ...

    There were many different reasons why the United States lost the war in Vietnam. To an extent, television was a reason why the United States lost the war. To add to that, the United States also lost the war in Vietnam due to their military tactics and the fact that

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work