• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Is there sufficient evidence in Sources A to F to explain why there was an anti-war movement in the United States?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Is there sufficient evidence in Sources A to F to explain why there was an anti-war movement in the United States? In the early sixties the public opinion was favourable towards USA's involvement in the war. From 64-65 a poll showed that 80 percent of the population agreed with Johnson and were for the war. At first, most Americans supported the war as the Domino theory was very popular and so people were prepared to let Johnson stop it at nearly any cost. Source A is a secondary Source from Four Hours in My Lai by Michael Bilton published in 1992. The Source says the army were willing to recruit less able soldiers and says that recruits were less intelligent. ...read more.

Middle

This war became known as the media war. Unlike the Korean War and World War Two, the American government decided not to censor it and let the press have free access. The result of this was to bring home live uncensored pictures of scenes like small children being burned alive by American napalm. This shocked the Americans back home, and practically every home owned a TV set, these shocking images bombarded the public, and sympathy for the war fell. Source C is a primary Source; it is an article by an American journalist, Richard Hamer. He is writing in 1970 about the widespread opposition to the American presence in Vietnam. ...read more.

Conclusion

This did not help win support for the war. Source E is secondary Source, it says how the media, especially television portrays the. This would show why there was so much protesting as they had been. This was the first time that the media was against the war therefore it showed all the brutality. Also the media became a business and everyone wanted things bigger and better. The Source says that because of the media the Americans are becoming anti-war. In my opinion I think that one Source is not enough to explain why there was anti-war movement in the United States, but there is sufficient evidence for an anti-war movement in all of them. Yahya Nakhuda 9064 631 words ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. How Useful are Sources A-C to explain why the United States became involved in ...

    When he says "to leave Vietnam to its fate would shake the value of an American commitment..." what he is trying to is say the freedom of the American people but what he means is to put a stop to communism.

  2. How Useful are Sources A to C to Explain Why the United States Became ...

    There were many different reasons why the United States lost the war in Vietnam. To an extent, television was a reason why the United States lost the war. To add to that, the United States also lost the war in Vietnam due to their military tactics and the fact that

  1. I will be looking at how the U.S became increasingly involved Vietnam, the problems ...

    A couple of guys are dead others are screaming in agony. Did one of them (the peasants) lob the mortar?" (Source A) This also meant that the U.S soldiers themselves were beginning to think if there was any point to the conflict.

  2. This statement suggests that television was an important reason why the united states lost ...

    William Calley. According to various accounts, the soldiers were given decidedly mixed messages about what to expect. Men, women and children, including babies, were killed in the carnage that followed. Praying children were shot in the back of the head, elderly men were hacked to death with bayonets.

  1. Is there sufficient evidence to explain why there was an anti war movement in ...

    This source shows innocent children suffering after a napalm attack, this may have caused the anti-war movement because the American people saw this picture and were shocked at this horrific scene.

  2. Is there sufficient evidence in sources A to F to explain why there was ...

    The use of Napalm alone was strongly opposed and added to the destruction of rainforests and spraying of chemicals caused massive opposition to the tactics being used to win the war. Americans thought the war, which at the time was costing them $20 billion year, was weakening an already fragile

  1. Is there sufficient evidence in Sources A to F to explain why there was ...

    Even so, the image alone is strong and simple enough for people at the time to feel that the war should stop in order to save innocent people from becoming victims of military attacks. Moreover, source C is about the opposition to the American presence in Vietnam, and it was written by Richard Hamer, an American journalist in 1970.

  2. Many peoples have contributed to the development of the United States of America, a ...

    on them but with their own consent, given personally or by their representatives." In March 1766, Parliament repealed the Stamp Act; it passed the Declaratory Act, asserting its complete sovereignty over the colonies. Thereafter the transatlantic controversy was rarely quiet.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work