• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Is there sufficient evidence in Sources A to F to explain why there was an anti-war movement in the United States?

Extracts from this document...


Is there sufficient evidence in Sources A to F to explain why there was an anti-war movement in the United States? In the early sixties the public opinion was favourable towards USA's involvement in the war. From 64-65 a poll showed that 80 percent of the population agreed with Johnson and were for the war. At first, most Americans supported the war as the Domino theory was very popular and so people were prepared to let Johnson stop it at nearly any cost. Source A is a secondary Source from Four Hours in My Lai by Michael Bilton published in 1992. The Source says the army were willing to recruit less able soldiers and says that recruits were less intelligent. ...read more.


This war became known as the media war. Unlike the Korean War and World War Two, the American government decided not to censor it and let the press have free access. The result of this was to bring home live uncensored pictures of scenes like small children being burned alive by American napalm. This shocked the Americans back home, and practically every home owned a TV set, these shocking images bombarded the public, and sympathy for the war fell. Source C is a primary Source; it is an article by an American journalist, Richard Hamer. He is writing in 1970 about the widespread opposition to the American presence in Vietnam. ...read more.


This did not help win support for the war. Source E is secondary Source, it says how the media, especially television portrays the. This would show why there was so much protesting as they had been. This was the first time that the media was against the war therefore it showed all the brutality. Also the media became a business and everyone wanted things bigger and better. The Source says that because of the media the Americans are becoming anti-war. In my opinion I think that one Source is not enough to explain why there was anti-war movement in the United States, but there is sufficient evidence for an anti-war movement in all of them. Yahya Nakhuda 9064 631 words ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. How Useful are Sources A-C to explain why the United States became involved in ...

    can count on us if they are attacked" This links to the Truman doctrine. It also contradicts what he says and feels in Source B, because in Source B he says he doesn't want to go to Vietnam and says that he doesn't care about Vietnam and questions what it is worth to him or his country.

  2. How useful are sources A to C to explain why the United States became ...

    Johnson has used the bible to gain public support, as he says, 'Hithertho shalt thou come, but no further...' He has done this because a lot of the United State's population were Christians so it would persuade them to think that going into war is morally the correct thing to do.

  1. Is There Sufficient Evidence In Sources A-F To Suggest Why There Was An Anti-War ...

    some of the audience who heard it would have been American so it would have spread word when they got back home. Robin Day talks about how war looks so realistic on colour TV and how the blood and the fighting is so much worse he talks about how it's made the American public more anti-war than anything.

  2. How Useful are Sources A to C to Explain Why the United States Became ...

    However, the source also has its limitations, as the speech was spoken by President Johnson and so is going to be biased in order to get all of the American public to support his ideas. President Johnson is talking to the public and as a result of this is going

  1. I will be looking at how the U.S became increasingly involved Vietnam, the problems ...

    Another turning point came in 1963 when President Kennedy was assassinated, this sent shockwaves throughout the world but more crucially to America's involvement in the war, it meant he would be replaced with a successor, Lyndon Johnson. President Johnson was much more committed to entering the USA into a full-scale war.

  2. This statement suggests that television was an important reason why the united states lost ...

    The aim of this was to clear the jungle so that the Vietnamese would have nowhere to hide and would have to fight face to face as the Americans had been trained, unfortunately the Americans did not bank on the growth rate of the jungle because within a week, the

  1. Is there sufficient evidence to explain why there was an anti war movement in ...

    As this source doesn't describe the brutality or tactics of the US it means that this sources use for explaining the anti-war movement lies on the conscription and taking young men away from their homes and families. This could have caused part of the protest, as many parents would have been unhappy about the conscription.

  2. Is there sufficient evidence in sources A to F to explain why there was ...

    This generated a lot of opposition from men who did not want to fight resulting in the many draft burning protests that took place. Drafting caused large amounts of resentment between the social classes as white middle class men could easily be cleared, whilst ethnic minorities were drafted.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work