• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Is there sufficient evidence in Sources A to F to explain why there was an anti-war movement in the United States?

Extracts from this document...


Is there sufficient evidence in Sources A to F to explain why there was an anti-war movement in the United States? In the early sixties the public opinion was favourable towards USA's involvement in the war. From 64-65 a poll showed that 80 percent of the population agreed with Johnson and were for the war. At first, most Americans supported the war as the Domino theory was very popular and so people were prepared to let Johnson stop it at nearly any cost. Source A is a secondary Source from Four Hours in My Lai by Michael Bilton published in 1992. The Source says the army were willing to recruit less able soldiers and says that recruits were less intelligent. ...read more.


This war became known as the media war. Unlike the Korean War and World War Two, the American government decided not to censor it and let the press have free access. The result of this was to bring home live uncensored pictures of scenes like small children being burned alive by American napalm. This shocked the Americans back home, and practically every home owned a TV set, these shocking images bombarded the public, and sympathy for the war fell. Source C is a primary Source; it is an article by an American journalist, Richard Hamer. He is writing in 1970 about the widespread opposition to the American presence in Vietnam. ...read more.


This did not help win support for the war. Source E is secondary Source, it says how the media, especially television portrays the. This would show why there was so much protesting as they had been. This was the first time that the media was against the war therefore it showed all the brutality. Also the media became a business and everyone wanted things bigger and better. The Source says that because of the media the Americans are becoming anti-war. In my opinion I think that one Source is not enough to explain why there was anti-war movement in the United States, but there is sufficient evidence for an anti-war movement in all of them. Yahya Nakhuda 9064 631 words ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. How Useful are Sources A-C to explain why the United States became involved in ...

    It also informs me of the political climate of the USA. It is useful because the author was there. It is reliable in the aspects of the source being tampered with. The source does not tell us specifics such as the defeat of France and the overthrow of Diem.

  2. How Useful are Sources A to C to Explain Why the United States Became ...

    Again, Source G has not got anything to do with the media, but is an American soldier's point of view after he had heard that '347 unarmed civilians' had been killed in the My Lai Massacre.

  1. I will be looking at how the U.S became increasingly involved Vietnam, the problems ...

    During the heat of battle he accidentally shoots one of his fellow soldiers, killing him. He is simply told to forget about this and move on. During another battle several bullets wound him, forcing him out of the war. Ron later discovers he is paralysed from the waist down, robbing

  2. This statement suggests that television was an important reason why the united states lost ...

    The events which happened in My Lai would not have been shown on TV but they would have almost certainly been talked about on TV as would other search and destroy missions have been. In 1967 a cartoon was published in 'punch magazine' which shows how President Johnson was sacrificing his dream of a great utopia i.e.

  1. Is there sufficient evidence to explain why there was an anti war movement in ...

    Source D is from a British magazine called "Punch" and is primary as it was produced in 1967. The source is a political cartoon which shows the effect of President Johnson's war policy on the "great society" - "his vision to feed and shelter the homeless, and to provide more education and medical care".

  2. Is there sufficient evidence in sources A to F to explain why there was ...

    The war took valuable funding and resources from these projects, resulting in more people showing their opposition to the war. The Black Civil Rights protests greatly backed up the anti-war movement, as they believed that mostly ethnic minorities were being drafted into the armed forces.

  1. Is there sufficient evidence in Sources A to F to explain why there was ...

    This suggests that even as an American the writer had no support for the US army in order to even sympathise for them. In addition, he continued to write comments as if they were guidelines on how attacks should take place.

  2. Many peoples have contributed to the development of the United States of America, a ...

    Nonetheless, the economic centralization long reflected in the NAVIGATION ACTS--which compelled much of the colonial trade to pass through Britain on its way to the European continent--served to remind colonials of the heavy price exacted from them for membership in the empire.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work