• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Is there sufficient evidence in Sources A to F to explain why there was an anti-war movement in the United States?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Is there sufficient evidence in Sources A to F to explain why there was an anti-war movement in the United States? In the early sixties the public opinion was favourable towards USA's involvement in the war. From 64-65 a poll showed that 80 percent of the population agreed with Johnson and were for the war. At first, most Americans supported the war as the Domino theory was very popular and so people were prepared to let Johnson stop it at nearly any cost. Source A is a secondary Source from Four Hours in My Lai by Michael Bilton published in 1992. The Source says the army were willing to recruit less able soldiers and says that recruits were less intelligent. ...read more.

Middle

This war became known as the media war. Unlike the Korean War and World War Two, the American government decided not to censor it and let the press have free access. The result of this was to bring home live uncensored pictures of scenes like small children being burned alive by American napalm. This shocked the Americans back home, and practically every home owned a TV set, these shocking images bombarded the public, and sympathy for the war fell. Source C is a primary Source; it is an article by an American journalist, Richard Hamer. He is writing in 1970 about the widespread opposition to the American presence in Vietnam. ...read more.

Conclusion

This did not help win support for the war. Source E is secondary Source, it says how the media, especially television portrays the. This would show why there was so much protesting as they had been. This was the first time that the media was against the war therefore it showed all the brutality. Also the media became a business and everyone wanted things bigger and better. The Source says that because of the media the Americans are becoming anti-war. In my opinion I think that one Source is not enough to explain why there was anti-war movement in the United States, but there is sufficient evidence for an anti-war movement in all of them. Yahya Nakhuda 9064 631 words ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. How Useful are Sources A-C to explain why the United States became involved in ...

    In source B the president starts off by saying "all the politicians are saying lets move in, lets go into the north" this suggests that the president was under pressure from his government to enter the war in Vietnam. From this we can question whether the US entering Vietnam was up to President Johnson or not.

  2. How useful are sources A to C to explain why the United States became ...

    In addition, he does not mention the Truman Doctrine or what his opinions are on it when he explains the only reasons they should go into war. This makes it less useful because historians will not be able to

  1. How Useful are Sources A to C to Explain Why the United States Became ...

    Americans also 'feared that South Vietnam might be able to reform and improve itself'. America also feared that Vietnam may 'develop its economy'. The US did not want anyone to build up their economy as Americas wanted to be world's supreme power.

  2. I will be looking at how the U.S became increasingly involved Vietnam, the problems ...

    The USA felt they had to honour this right from the start. The USA also believed that if Vietnam fell to communism then other countries surrounding it would too. Known as the Domino Theory this a long-term reason for the USA entering the war, as they did not want to let communism spread further than it already had.

  1. This statement suggests that television was an important reason why the united states lost ...

    Bombing was also directed against territory controlled by the NLF in South Vietnam. The plan was for Operation Rolling Thunder to last for eight weeks but it lasted for the next three years.

  2. Is there sufficient evidence to explain why there was an anti war movement in ...

    The strengths of this source are that it is a real event that has been captured by a free-lance photographer, which means it is unbiased because they are not working for the USA or Vietcong. However it is a snap shot and may not be getting the whole story of events.

  1. Is there sufficient evidence in sources A to F to explain why there was ...

    and weak economy, and at the time the President Lynden Johnson had promised that he was going invigorate the economy and make it stronger. Johnson had also promised better health care, better housing, a better transport system and reducing the social divisions between Americans.

  2. Is there sufficient evidence in Sources A to F to explain why there was ...

    Since this photo was published during the war, it would have had a big impact on people's opinion and could have possibly changed the way people thought. Furthermore, this source is useful because it is a photo which means it cannot be exaggerated, unlike an illustration.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work