Is there sufficient evidence in Sources A to F to explain why there was an anti-war movement in the United States?

Source B is a primary Source; it is a photograph of napalm victims, published during the Vietnam War.  This war became known as the media war. Unlike the Korean War and World War Two, the American government decided not to censor it and let the press have free access. The result of this was to bring home live uncensored pictures of scenes like small children being burned alive by American napalm.  This shocked the Americans back home, and practically every home owned a TV set, these shocking images bombarded the public, and sympathy for the war fell.

Source C is a primary Source; it is an article by an American journalist, Richard Hamer. He is writing in 1970 about the widespread opposition to the American presence in Vietnam.   The Source describes how the soldiers were killed and their reaction.  The Source says that the soldiers were in bad situations and with reluctance they kept their tactics and the napalm bombs to stop communism.  The American government was not concerned about how many people were killed or how many they were killing just as long it stopped communism.  This article went towards the anti-war feelings.

Source D is a primary Source; it is cartoon published in the British magazine Punch in 1967 criticising America.  It shows that the money that was for the ‘Great Society’ is going up in smoke and getting used for Vietnam.  Thirteen percent of all government spending by 1968 was on Vietnam. This denied funds to America other needs such as hospitals, education and health. Black leaders such as Martin Luther King challenged the American spending, saying that they were neglecting the social issues, such as racism, social security and many other affairs that were a problem for America at the time. This did not help win support for the war.

Source E is secondary Source, it says how the media, especially television portrays the. This would show why there was so much protesting as they had been.  This was the first time that the media was against the war therefore it showed all the brutality.  Also the media became a business and everyone wanted things bigger and better.  The Source says that because of the media the Americans are becoming anti-war.

In my opinion I think that one Source is not enough to explain why there was anti-war movement in the United States, but there is sufficient evidence for an anti-war movement in all of them.