• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Justifications of War On Iraq.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Arthur Kanai Mrs. Keeton Justifications of War On Iraq From the beginning of time, civilization has been plagued by war, whether it be physical boundaries or war declared in the name of God. Throughout history, millions have died in senseless massacres showing that civilization's civility is only skin deep. As war lingers in the minds of all people in the world today, a tough question is asked. Is this war waged by the United States of America against a small foe, Iraq, just? In this country, millions are protesting. But to every protester, there are about three supporters of the war. The Pope along with many other religious leaders condemn the acts of death, yet others support it. Can two people that worship the same God really disagree so much? This question cannot be answered until a number of other questions are addressed. War on Iraq is indeed just in that we must disarm a totalitarianist regime that has never been willing to follow the rules; Saddam Hussein has continued to defy the world with his games and maintain weapons of mass destruction. The game is over. After the first Gulf War, the international community was set on ridding Iraq of weapons of mass destruction. ...read more.

Middle

It is obvious now that Saddam Hussein has not been complying. The very missiles he claimed not to have has been deployed to Kuwait in order to attack coalition troops there. Clearly, the dictator is in material breach of the resolution, then why aren't the very countries that signed the resolution in defiance of the United States? France has been the head of the beast, leading the way in public humiliation toward the US (Full speed ahead 27). For the first time since 1956, the French Foreign Minister to the UN has vowed to use their power to veto to prevent any attack against Iraq (27). Public disgust for the French has never been denied in the States, but it has become a lot worse (L'Europe, C'est Moi 46). There has been an outcry by US politician to boycott French goods, and to change the names of products associated with the name "French." Yet global views of the US has not lightened either. America in the past few months have been a target of protests in massive proportions. They have been the "largest antiwar rallies ever seen in Europe (28)." Why has America's oldest ally, dating back to the revolutionary war, decided to turn their backs on us? ...read more.

Conclusion

Yet our global interests are not global domination, history has shown that. What this war is about is the disarmament of an evil dictator, and the liberation of his people. Saddam Hussein kills, imprisons, executes, and tortures his people. "5,000 deaths a month of children below the age of five (Why 13)." That is only the children. After the first Gulf War, he slaughtered thousands of opposition forces. He's used chemical weapons against our military and his own people. He is Hitler in the flesh. There is no denying his ambition to take over countries, and to kill anyone who stands in his way. War with Iraq is necessary. We must not be hesitant in going to war with them. We cannot let innocent people die at the hands of a tyrant and look the other way. He has repeatedly defied the world with games. But death is no game. And if he wants to play a game, the game is over. 360,000 children under the age of five died since the first Gulf War. That number does not include the hundreds of thousands he has mass murdered. War against Hitler was widely supported here either, but looking back in history, we know it was the right thing to liberate the Jews. This war is not simply killing more people. It is the act of liberating a people in need of desperate help. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. History of the United States

    Democrats alleged that Radical Reconstruction was not genuinely concerned with aiding black people, but with using southern black votes to keep the Republicans in power in Congress and to retain their protective tariffs and other aids to industrialists. When evidence of corruption surfaced during the Grant administration, Democrats declared that

  2. Why did President Bush not invade Iraq after he had won so easily in ...

    vote for their own leader, there would have still been doubts as to the legitimacy of the election and whether the new leader was acting under his own power, or was simply a puppet of the US government.12 The United States could not afford to risk any loss in trade

  1. American History.

    - During the SGA preachers encouraged sinners to repent and offered them a chance to become true Christians. Salvation was available for all through personal conversion. This philosophy increased lay participation, made religion more democratic, and led to efforts to reform society.

  2. Should Britain Pull Out Their Troops From Iraq?

    in Iraq Tony Blair still wants to carry on side by side with George Bush fighting the Iraqi forces. Also the source talks about some of the public wanting Tony Blair to resign. This source is valid because it is from the Star and is from an article which was

  1. The role of Saddam Hussain in serving the aims of America in the Middle ...

    Egypt was the instruction that America gave to the oil tankers not to offload their oil in the British seaports unless Britain complied with the American demands. Britain learnt from this experience a very harsh lesson that she did not forget in a hurry.

  2. "The Controversy over the War with Iraq".

    Saddam has a long history with terrorism and after the United States found out that one of the hijackers met with Iraq intelligence before 9/11, Saddam became more responsible of the attacks. Most of presidents Bush's time in the year of 2002 was spent trying to revenge the attacks and how to get Saddam (Kraft, 2003).

  1. US President George Bush labelled Iran and Iraq as part of an "axis of ...

    Iran could easily sustain its energy requirements using oil. Even if Iran wanted to produce nuclear power for civilian use, there is no need for it to start nuclear fuel cycle and reprocessing operations. Such operations are only done to produce fissionable material14, which is against the NPT.15 A recent CIA report has found that much of Iran's nuclear programme is indeed aimed at manufacturing nuclear weapons.

  2. The Prelude to the 1975 War and the Cairo Agreement.

    On August 12 Christian forces finally overran the camp. About 1,600 people died in fighting during the entire siege, and 4,000 were wounded. The surviving civilians were deported to Palestinian held areas and the PLO then settled them in Damour. Despite the loss of Tal al-Zaatar, the PLO still had however a massive military machine in Lebanon.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work