• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Justifications of War On Iraq.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Arthur Kanai Mrs. Keeton Justifications of War On Iraq From the beginning of time, civilization has been plagued by war, whether it be physical boundaries or war declared in the name of God. Throughout history, millions have died in senseless massacres showing that civilization's civility is only skin deep. As war lingers in the minds of all people in the world today, a tough question is asked. Is this war waged by the United States of America against a small foe, Iraq, just? In this country, millions are protesting. But to every protester, there are about three supporters of the war. The Pope along with many other religious leaders condemn the acts of death, yet others support it. Can two people that worship the same God really disagree so much? This question cannot be answered until a number of other questions are addressed. War on Iraq is indeed just in that we must disarm a totalitarianist regime that has never been willing to follow the rules; Saddam Hussein has continued to defy the world with his games and maintain weapons of mass destruction. The game is over. After the first Gulf War, the international community was set on ridding Iraq of weapons of mass destruction. ...read more.

Middle

It is obvious now that Saddam Hussein has not been complying. The very missiles he claimed not to have has been deployed to Kuwait in order to attack coalition troops there. Clearly, the dictator is in material breach of the resolution, then why aren't the very countries that signed the resolution in defiance of the United States? France has been the head of the beast, leading the way in public humiliation toward the US (Full speed ahead 27). For the first time since 1956, the French Foreign Minister to the UN has vowed to use their power to veto to prevent any attack against Iraq (27). Public disgust for the French has never been denied in the States, but it has become a lot worse (L'Europe, C'est Moi 46). There has been an outcry by US politician to boycott French goods, and to change the names of products associated with the name "French." Yet global views of the US has not lightened either. America in the past few months have been a target of protests in massive proportions. They have been the "largest antiwar rallies ever seen in Europe (28)." Why has America's oldest ally, dating back to the revolutionary war, decided to turn their backs on us? ...read more.

Conclusion

Yet our global interests are not global domination, history has shown that. What this war is about is the disarmament of an evil dictator, and the liberation of his people. Saddam Hussein kills, imprisons, executes, and tortures his people. "5,000 deaths a month of children below the age of five (Why 13)." That is only the children. After the first Gulf War, he slaughtered thousands of opposition forces. He's used chemical weapons against our military and his own people. He is Hitler in the flesh. There is no denying his ambition to take over countries, and to kill anyone who stands in his way. War with Iraq is necessary. We must not be hesitant in going to war with them. We cannot let innocent people die at the hands of a tyrant and look the other way. He has repeatedly defied the world with games. But death is no game. And if he wants to play a game, the game is over. 360,000 children under the age of five died since the first Gulf War. That number does not include the hundreds of thousands he has mass murdered. War against Hitler was widely supported here either, but looking back in history, we know it was the right thing to liberate the Jews. This war is not simply killing more people. It is the act of liberating a people in need of desperate help. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. I have chosen to debate whether the decision to attack Iraq was indeed a ...

    The Baathist regime in Iraq does not qualify; thus, under al Qaeda doctrine, it must be swept away, along with the equally deficient governments in Egypt, Jordan, and Saudi Arabia. It follows that a U.S. effort to oust Saddam Hussein and replace his regime with another secular government - this

  2. History of the United States

    So, too, young people turned to new leaders and values and sought unorthodox dress, recreations, and morals. Traditional WASP (white, Anglo-Saxon Protestant) America fought the new ways. The adoption of PROHIBITION in 1919 (with ratification of the 18TH AMENDMENT) had been a victory of Yankee moral values over those of

  1. American History.

    Southern leaders, who responded by convincing the 1844 Democratic convention to use a new rule - if candidate not chose by 2/3 of convention he's out. This blocked Van Buren as the nominee and led to the selection of James K.

  2. The role of Saddam Hussain in serving the aims of America in the Middle ...

    The American dominance over the oil markets at that time was reflected in the Seven Sisters. The Seven Sisters were the seven oil companies, most of them American that dominated the oil markets up until 1970. They controlled about 90 % of the world's oil reserves.

  1. The case against war on Iraq.

    For this to be grounds for a war, the US also had to prove that Iraq was involved in terrorism. "Terrorism - the systematic use of violence as a means to intimidate or coerce societies or governments" Jefferson's dictionary The only sensible justification for a pre-emptive strike is the threat from terrorism on USA.

  2. Why did President Bush not invade Iraq after he had won so easily in ...

    a country that had a history of dictators.5 Whichever solution was chosen, the fact remained that an American force would have to remain in the country.6 This then raised another question, who would stay and who would be allowed to come home?

  1. Should Britain Pull Out Their Troops From Iraq?

    The next section in this is about a march against the war and that they don't believe that Saddam Hussein is a threat. Robin Cook also disagrees with the war and wish that British troops were pulled out. The last section in the source goes on and tells you about the deaths that have been in Iraq.

  2. "The Controversy over the War with Iraq".

    Then after September 11, 2001 the United States immediately started to search for the people behind these attacks. Saddam Hussein was an easy target for the United States to blame for the attacks, along with Osama Bin Laden the al-quada leader.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work