• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"Little more than a show and a sham" Discuss this view of Mussolini's economic policies.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

* "Little more than a show and a sham" Discuss this view of Mussolini's economic policies. Mussolini's economic policies included the battle for lire, grain and land as well as the idea of Corporativism and state intervention during the worldwide depression following the Wall Street crash. All of his policies involved a propaganda, or 'show', element to them. This highlighted their success and hid their failures. To decide whether his economic policies were a show and a sham, each separate part of his policies need to be looked at. Mussolini wanted Italy to be 'great, respected and feared'; he tried to achieve this through his economic 'battles'. The fact that they were called battles shows that Mussolini wanted to use them for propaganda purposes. The biggest show of Mussolini's economic battles was the Battle for Land. This battle aimed to turn Italy's unusable marshland into land that could be used to build city's upon and for agricultural purposes. 80,000 hectares of former marshland was drained and tuned into useable land, this was only one-twentieth of the propaganda claim. ...read more.

Middle

Importantly, it also resulted in the production of products such as olives and grapes declining. These products were exported to other countries and gave Italy a lot of money. The battle for grain can also been seen as a show. There are memorable pictures of a bare chest Mussolini helping present farmers take in the years harvest. Overall, the battle for grain was not a complete sham but was a show. Mussolini was the pioneer of what he saw as the 'third way' between capitalism and communism. This was the corporative state, and its aim was to reconcile workers and employers and unite Italian's to produce for the nation. This third way would organise the economy into corporation in which both employers and workers would be represented. Businesses would not be owned by the state, like they would be in a communist state, and they would not be completely free, like they would be in a true capitalist state. Instead they would be left in private hands but would be regulated by corporations in order to ensure that production was directed in the national interest. ...read more.

Conclusion

The government's actions to survive the great depression mean that not all of Mussolini's economic policies were a show and a sham. In conclusion, Mussolini's economic policies were essentially a show and a sham engineered to ensure the regime's support. The battle for land produced few results but was billed as success on an international level. The battle for lira made the country look strong whilst it actually weakened it and resulted in wage cuts. The corporative state did little for the countries workers and was not effective at helping the nations interests. Despite these failures there were two successes. The main one is the government's dealing with the worldwide depression. Their intervention prevented the levels of mass unemployment and recession that were seen in other Western European countries. To a lesser extent, the battle for grain was a success as by 1940 the country was almost self sufficient in this area. Even with these two successes it must be remembered that the countries national debt before the war was over 150 billion lire. With this taken into account it is reasonable to say that Mussolini's economic policies were a show and a sham. History (NAJ) Fascist Economy Essay 3/7/07 Russell Wright 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Assess the view that the failures of the Congress of Vienna outweighed the successes.

    own convenience and interest and took no account of the aspirations of the people.'21 This was a prime failure of the settlement, as in most cases where the principle of legitimacy was applied, there was another consideration at work, for example, in central Italy restoring Habsburgs dukes and principles was

  2. Reasons for Napoleon's Success (to 1807).

    No attempt had been made by the French to support Russia's policy of expanding into the eastern Mediterranean and taking Constantinople. French troops were stationed in the east on the river Oder and in the Duchy of Oldenburg Russia felt endangered by the close proximity of French troops.

  1. 'In reality he achieved very little.' How far do you agree with this judgment ...

    ........He wanted a strong economic base that could support military might and territorial expansion, and give rise to autarky. The corporate state would create harmony between the workers and the industrialists and introduce fascist influence into industry.

  2. "The Fascist Economy was pure illusion". Discuss

    but couldn't keep the correct equilibrium for this. The sustainable lira therefore became an illusion to most in the country, and also it seems to Mussolini himself, who persisted in trying to set the Lira at a specific rate, despite the fact that it was harming the country and enabling his opposition to rise up against him.

  1. To what extent were economic considerations the main motive for Portuguese exploration and empire ...

    Many people also believed that exploration held the key to gaining victory over the Moors, and that searching the African Coast could gain a root to find the mythical king "Prestor John". He has already been motioned in this essay for the above factor but he is mentioned here as

  2. Causes of show trials + purges of 1930s.

    the party and official reasons for these expulsions were 24.1% of the expelled were not showing enough Bolshevik zeal, 21.1% were guilty of breaching Party discipline, 16% were enemies of the people of the Soviet Union, 11.8% were guilty of moral decay, 8.8% were going bourgeois´┐Ż, and 5.8% were climbing,

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work