Current US President Bush has made it a national priority once again to establish the national missile defense just as President Reagan did. The cost of this program may exceed 150 billion dollars in the next ten years making it one of the most expensive projects in America’s history in the next ten years (Cite Esiendrath). The current administration at the white house plans to increase US national security through this so called missile shield, but will only aggravate the situation. The national missile defense will deepen tensions between current allies, the emerging power such as China, and an old foe, Russia. As a result these countries would start a new international arms race, and aggressively pursuit to increase their nuclear, chemical, and biological weapon stockpiles. The national missile defense issue has been brought up by the Bush Administration, due to the fact of arising exaggerated threats from “rogues states” such as North Korea, Iraq, and Iran; the latter being invaded by the United States based on a falsehood of it having WMDs (Cite Esiendrath).  Its has become evident in the past couple of years that use of cowboy politics used by the current superpower is unacceptable. This policy basically is shoot first ask questions later, it focuses on heavy defensive building. Bush has asked for around 48 billion dollars in defense spending. Diplomacy and nuclear deterrence is needed at this current stage to address America’s and Canada’s security needs and goals, not a hopeless dream of creating an anti nuclear blanket over North America when the threat doesn’t exist. The issue of missile defense arised back in May 1, 2001, where President George W. Bush made I clear the United States would move towards deploying an extensive and
Join now!
expensive anti-ballistic missile shield against nuclear missiles(cite estrdian pg1). This shield was not aimed at America’s old enemy Russia but at other rogue states. Bush’s predecessor Clinton deferred from the national missile defense due to the fact the technology was not available or tested at various levels. Clinton was against the missile shied due to several reasons: the system not technologically possible, had failed on numerous tests; it could be easily foiled by decoys and system failures, and most importantly Russian, China, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization objected to it (Cite Estridan 2). Furthermore, this installment of the shield would ...

This is a preview of the whole essay