• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

October Revolution 1917

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Why were the Bolsheviks successful in October 1917? In October of 1917, the Bolsheviks took power within Russia. Although their party was small, it was dedicated to making Russia a powerful communist party. So how did the Bolsheviks take power, was it because of their strength, or because of the weaknesses and failures of the provisional government. Was it due to the strong leadership shown by Lenin, the policy of ending the very unpopular war or their radical policies which the workers and soldiers both agreed with. However, was it because the provisional government had very little power, the mistakes made by Kerensky, or the divisions within the government which often contradicted each other. Lenin was the leader of the Bolsheviks. His role in the October revolution was critical. He was a strong leader, who empowered his supporters. He was the key-stone to the Bolshevik bridge, and with his determined personality he could push through vital policies. ...read more.

Middle

The workers and soldiers of Russia had very similar ideas. They both wanted an end to the war and wanted the majority of power, if not all of it, to go to the soviet. The Bolsheviks had powerful propaganda, including the slogan "Peace, Bread and all power to the Soviets!", which fitted perfectly with the workers and soldiers thoughts. The result was the workers and many soldiers became members of the Bolshevik party. The Putilov works were renowned for being strong Bolshevik supporters. The Bolsheviks opposed the provisional government, because they thought that Russia could go from a monarchy, to communism in one fell swoop. The provisional government also opposed the Bolsheviks, but had no real power due to the Soviet of workers. The first order the Soviet gave, made the provisional government have no power at all. It stated the workers and soldiers had to follow what the government said, but only if the Soviet agreed with it. ...read more.

Conclusion

This made the government indecisive, which again made the government very unpopular, and again support for the Bolsheviks increased. In October 1917, the Bolshevik party staged a revolution to take power, but how did they do this. The Bolshevik party was still a relatively small party compared to others. The provisional government was very unpopular for things such as the Kerensky Offensive, and not stopping the war. The Bolsheviks had a strong leader, who was undisputed at the top of the party, and were campaigning to end the war. The reason they were so successful was because of the war. If the provisional government had ended the war, they would have taken away the Bolsheviks main policy, which gained them many thousands of supporters, and mainly gained them the support of some of the army. Without the army, they would have not been able to take over in October, and therefore would have not been successful. Andy Smith ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Other Historical Periods section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Other Historical Periods essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Was the War Measures act necessary for the October Crisis

    4 star(s)

    This explosion caused massive destruction, estimated in the millions of dollars, and seriously injured 27 people. Showing that they had no regard for human life, the FLQ was known as a terrorist organization.

  2. To what extent is it true to say the Provisional Government faced an impossible ...

    fact that as well as being completely out of touch and unrepresentative of the majority of the Russian population the Provisional Government, as an unelected body, lacked legitimacy. This was a difficult problem to tackle and it proved an important factor in the downfall of the Provisional Government.

  1. How and why did the Bolsheviks gain power in 1917?

    - the majority. On the 22nd of January, 1905, a lone Priest of the Russian Orthodox Church led an organized march of workers and their families towards the Winter Palace. This peaceful protest was aimed at gaining the Tsar's attention to the deteriorated conditions within Russia.

  2. Explain why the Bolsheviks and Mensheviks Split in 1903

    They believed that the members of the party should have a say in the party's policy making. Lenin and his followers also believed that the party should be made up of a small number of highly disciplined professional revolutionaries.

  1. The structures of the Soviet State were created by Lenin and abused by Stalin. ...

    How is it possible to accuse Stalin of abusing the structure when he used it the way it was supposed to be used? (albeit more extravagantly than Lenin chose to); "It was Lenin who laid the police state foundations

  2. The First English Civil War

    equipment, was not greatly inferior in numbers or enthusiasm to that of Parliament. The latter (20,000 strong, exclusive of detachments) was organised during July, August, and September about London, and moved from there to Northampton under the command of Lord Essex.

  1. Why did bolsheviks win civil war

    The large differences between the Whites and limited control over the railway network, meant communication was very difficult, especially the moving of men and weapons. With there being no telephone links, coordinating attacks on the Red Army would prove to be a hinderance to the Whites as they had to use officers on horseback to convey messages.

  2. A direct comparison of the role of central power and control during the late ...

    however with suggestions that 'local party bodies protected their own areas of power and did not always feedback accurate information to the centre,'4 by delegating power from the centre, control of the Russian people was undermined and such this suggests that control under the Autocratic system was stronger than that under the Communists.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work