• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

October Revolution 1917

Extracts from this document...


Why were the Bolsheviks successful in October 1917? In October of 1917, the Bolsheviks took power within Russia. Although their party was small, it was dedicated to making Russia a powerful communist party. So how did the Bolsheviks take power, was it because of their strength, or because of the weaknesses and failures of the provisional government. Was it due to the strong leadership shown by Lenin, the policy of ending the very unpopular war or their radical policies which the workers and soldiers both agreed with. However, was it because the provisional government had very little power, the mistakes made by Kerensky, or the divisions within the government which often contradicted each other. Lenin was the leader of the Bolsheviks. His role in the October revolution was critical. He was a strong leader, who empowered his supporters. He was the key-stone to the Bolshevik bridge, and with his determined personality he could push through vital policies. ...read more.


The workers and soldiers of Russia had very similar ideas. They both wanted an end to the war and wanted the majority of power, if not all of it, to go to the soviet. The Bolsheviks had powerful propaganda, including the slogan "Peace, Bread and all power to the Soviets!", which fitted perfectly with the workers and soldiers thoughts. The result was the workers and many soldiers became members of the Bolshevik party. The Putilov works were renowned for being strong Bolshevik supporters. The Bolsheviks opposed the provisional government, because they thought that Russia could go from a monarchy, to communism in one fell swoop. The provisional government also opposed the Bolsheviks, but had no real power due to the Soviet of workers. The first order the Soviet gave, made the provisional government have no power at all. It stated the workers and soldiers had to follow what the government said, but only if the Soviet agreed with it. ...read more.


This made the government indecisive, which again made the government very unpopular, and again support for the Bolsheviks increased. In October 1917, the Bolshevik party staged a revolution to take power, but how did they do this. The Bolshevik party was still a relatively small party compared to others. The provisional government was very unpopular for things such as the Kerensky Offensive, and not stopping the war. The Bolsheviks had a strong leader, who was undisputed at the top of the party, and were campaigning to end the war. The reason they were so successful was because of the war. If the provisional government had ended the war, they would have taken away the Bolsheviks main policy, which gained them many thousands of supporters, and mainly gained them the support of some of the army. Without the army, they would have not been able to take over in October, and therefore would have not been successful. Andy Smith ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Other Historical Periods section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Other Historical Periods essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Was the War Measures act necessary for the October Crisis

    4 star(s)

    The leaders of this branch of the FLQ included Louise Lanct�t(Louise Cossette-Trudel), Francis Simard, Bernard Lortie, Jacques Lanct�t, Paul Rose, Marc Carbonneau, Yves Langlois (aka Pierre Seguin) and Nigel Barry Hamer. 11.1 Jacques Lanct�t 1.2 Paul Rose 1.3 Francis Simmard 1.4 Benard Lortie The Front de Liberation du Quebec released

  2. Explain why the Bolsheviks and Mensheviks Split in 1903

    He wanted to make sure that the living and working conditions of the workers continued to degrade so that they would become even more dissatisfied with the government. He believed that this dissatisfaction would drive the proletariat revolution to overthrow capitalism.

  1. A direct comparison of the role of central power and control during the late ...

    the Tsar was limited in what he could expect the army to do. Hence 'this meant that officers and conservative forces could not count on any local troops to attack the Bolsheviks'23 during the October revolution, and also why it was the Army itself that forced the Tsar to abdicate.

  2. The First English Civil War

    The battle did not last long. The combined attack of the Oxford force from Roundway and of Hopton's men from the town practically annihilated Waller's army. Very soon afterwards, Rupert came up with fresh Royalist forces, and the combined armies moved westward.

  1. How and why did the Bolsheviks gain power in 1917?

    - the majority. On the 22nd of January, 1905, a lone Priest of the Russian Orthodox Church led an organized march of workers and their families towards the Winter Palace. This peaceful protest was aimed at gaining the Tsar's attention to the deteriorated conditions within Russia.

  2. To what extent is it true to say the Provisional Government faced an impossible ...

    Government as although the lower classes and peasantry had little legal status, they were indeed the masses and therefore physical rebellion if posed by them would be definite threat to the Provisional Government. Another factor which increased the extent to which the Provisional Government faced an impossible task, was the

  1. The Significance of the Irish Convention, 1917

    Rule as unavoidable but was keen to make the most of the situation. His aim now was to ensure Ulster was not excluded. As a minority in a 26 county Home Rule, the Southern Unionists feared that if the Ulster Unionists were to mistreat the Catholic minority in the event

  2. The structures of the Soviet State were created by Lenin and abused by Stalin. ...

    core, and utterly devoid of ethical sentiments".7 Other Centre-Left to Socialist historians judge Lenin less harshly and believe Stalin's policies as discontinuing those of Lenin's. Stephen F. Cohen, when talking about Leninist Bolshevism and Stalinism said: "they were two radically different phenomena".8 Stalin's use of fear-mongering ("the use of fear

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work