• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Russia 1905-1941 'Explain how the unpopularity of the Provisional Government contributed to the Bolshevik Revolution of November 1917'

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Russia 1905-1941 'Explain how the unpopularity of the Provisional Government contributed to the Bolshevik Revolution of November 1917' The Provisional Government, Russia's new Administration, consisted of twelve members from the Duma, who were chosen by only a small minority of the Russian public to govern their country. The Provisional Government accepted it was a temporary authority which had been rushed into power following the collapse of Tsarism. The new government consisted of mainly the Russian capitalists and bourgeoisie, and consequently peasants turned their support towards the Petrograd Soviet. The Petrograd Soviet like the Provisional Government had been formed hastily out of the Petrograd strike committee and lacked the authority to govern. It consisted of two major left wing revolutionary parties, the Mensheviks and the Socialist Revolutionaries, and both were willing to work together with the Provisional Government but were ultimately dedicated to a further revolution. Although the Petrograd Soviets throughout Russia were not opposed to the Provisional Government and co-operated with the administration, they were looking to hold the greater authority. This authority was gained when the Soviets issued Order Number One which unofficially gave them the power to prohibit military decisions made by the Provisional Government. Despite the weak position of the Provisional Government, with the Petrograd Soviet having moderate control over its decisions, it still managed an enormous programme of legislative changes for Russia within the first two months of office. These included trial by jury, the abolishment of capital punishment and exile, removal of discrimination and the initiation of the eight hour working day. Enforcing these legislative changes, meant the Provisional Government won some popular public support, and ensured its survival for a short length of time. However unless the government could do something about Russia's state of crisis, the new legislation would mean nothing. The Government had inherited an accumulation of problems from the Tsarist regime, chiefly amongst them was the unpopularity of the war. ...read more.

Middle

The Russian public believed this decision was unwarranted since the food was desperately needed more in the cities and the majority of the Russian public did not want the war to continue. The peasants were also clamouring for greater land distribution. The Provisional government promised this land to the peasants which never materialised. This caused severe discontent among the peasants. The Bolshevik Party appealed to their beliefs and offered them their land and food gaining immense support. The dissatisfaction of Russian society with the Provisional government meant they were easily aroused into drastic action by revolutionary groups. The First World War also had a devastating effect on the Russian economy. The Provisional government was unable to afford the war effort, inflation occurred and paper money had to be printed. This consequently meant that the workers could afford less making them even worse off. They had no money to buy the small high priced amounts of food that was available. The Bolsheviks were the only party against the War and consequently appealed to their beliefs. The Bolsheviks were also very sophisticated at infiltrating ideas into the Russian army that the soldiers were being used as 'common fodder', fighting in a war which only served the interests of the Russian upper classes. This was important in raising anti-war opinion and consequently the popularity of the Bolsheviks. The Provisional Government was forced to carry on with the war even if it was against the majority of the Russian public's beliefs. If Russia was going to withdraw from the war then the military personnel would have returned and probably would have joined the Petrograd Soviet. With this extra support the Petrograd Soviet could have ultimately controlled the military, consequently their power would have increased and the Provisional Government would not have the power over Russia to implement its ideas. However, the Provisional Government's decision to carry on with the war increased the support of the anti-war Bolsheviks. ...read more.

Conclusion

He emphasised that the war was a war of Capitalist Imperialism, and that the government were participating in the slaughter of millions of Russian men in the war. Lenin was also able to get Trotsky on his side, and through Trotsky's fast organisation of the Red Guard he made it possible for a Bolshevik Revolution to occur quickly and effectively. However it has to be argued that the action undertaken by Lenin inevitably led to the revolution and not the Kornilov revolt as Kerensy claimed. The results of the municipal elections in Moscow show that the Bolsheviks cumulated 49.6% of the seats, occurring in 1917, before the Kornilov revolt. Lenin's written works 'fskra' about a Marxist revolution and all of his revolutionary ideas made a Bolshevik revolution inevitable before the Kornilov revolt. A long-term problem constantly led to a number of short-term problems which acted as a powerful catalyst to a further revolution. Lenin's oratory, personality and leadership skills led to triggers leading to the Bolshevik revolution. Trotsky's organisation and use of the Red Guards, and the effects of the Kornilov Revolt, August 1917 were the triggers. As Lenin's political acumen acerbated these factors Kerensky thought of a plan to get people on his side which was the Kornilov Revolt but unfortunately it ended up backfiring on him. After the Kornilov Revolt change was inevitable, though Kerensky could have taken more effective action in stopping a Bolshevik Revolution. He could have discredited Lenin but Kerensky did not even attempt to do this. The support of the Bolsheviks was great enough to take power. Many people knew revolution was certain, but it specifically came in the shape of a Bolshevik Revolution because Lenin with his excellent oratory, personality and leadership skills was the only person who stood up and took control. Lenin gained the support of the public and got their mood of the time correct and so epitomised powerfully what the public wanted. Their needs were exemplified in his April Theses which was 'peace, bread and land'. 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Explain how the effects of the First World War caused the collapse of the ...

    4 star(s)

    They replaced ministers of the Duma with their 'friends' and this meant that there was nobody organizing food, fuel or other supplies. This was, therefore, a cause of the shortages on the home front. The transport system wasn't run properly and couldn't supply the factories, people and army at the same time.

  2. Stalins Russia, 1924-53 revision guide

    * All Bolsheviks agreed on the need for an economy based on industry to ensure the maintenance of the world's first socialist state. * The question that taxed the Party was how to maximise investment income. * Borrowing from the West was out - when they came to power the

  1. Why did Tsarism survive the revolution of 1905 but not that of March 1917

    This was also mainly due to the lack of unity and coordination among the radicals and revolutionaries, as their outbreaks, though spontaneous, were sparse and unorganised which meant the armed forces and police could easily suppress them one by one.

  2. The Significance of Lenin in the Bolshevik Revolution (1917-1923)

    His offers of food were also a big attraction because inflation was causing prices of the already limited food to rise. Lenin introduced a new tactic of targeting the peasants.

  1. Why Were There Two Revolutions in Russia in 1917?

    Reluctantly, he abdicated on 2nd March, and the Provisional Government was formed by the remnants of the Duma, backed by the Petrograd Soviet. Within just over a week, the first revolution in Russia in 1917 had succeeded.

  2. FRench revolution

    The government had a chance to take control of the situation the Crown had no clear plans of how to get France out of the financial mess she faced. The masses would have supported the king if he offered reform but nothing was done and made them want a revolution even more.

  1. Why did revolution in Russia succeed in February 1917 and not in 1905? (30 ...

    to share power with the Tsar, as the Revolution elevated and the army defected, meant that no such strategy could be repeated. Combined with the defection of the army, this doomed the Tsar. It was the Tsar?s actions in relation to the war which contributed to the Provisional Government?s decision.

  2. The Bolsheviks were able to seize power in October 1917 mainly because of the ...

    He saw the promises to end the war, to give land to the people and ensure adequate food supplies provided the useful rallying cry of ?peace, land and bread? and to give ?All Power to the Soviets? which was spread through the Bolshevik newspaper, ?Pravda?.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work