• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Russia 1905-1941 'Explain how the unpopularity of the Provisional Government contributed to the Bolshevik Revolution of November 1917'

Extracts from this document...


Russia 1905-1941 'Explain how the unpopularity of the Provisional Government contributed to the Bolshevik Revolution of November 1917' The Provisional Government, Russia's new Administration, consisted of twelve members from the Duma, who were chosen by only a small minority of the Russian public to govern their country. The Provisional Government accepted it was a temporary authority which had been rushed into power following the collapse of Tsarism. The new government consisted of mainly the Russian capitalists and bourgeoisie, and consequently peasants turned their support towards the Petrograd Soviet. The Petrograd Soviet like the Provisional Government had been formed hastily out of the Petrograd strike committee and lacked the authority to govern. It consisted of two major left wing revolutionary parties, the Mensheviks and the Socialist Revolutionaries, and both were willing to work together with the Provisional Government but were ultimately dedicated to a further revolution. Although the Petrograd Soviets throughout Russia were not opposed to the Provisional Government and co-operated with the administration, they were looking to hold the greater authority. This authority was gained when the Soviets issued Order Number One which unofficially gave them the power to prohibit military decisions made by the Provisional Government. Despite the weak position of the Provisional Government, with the Petrograd Soviet having moderate control over its decisions, it still managed an enormous programme of legislative changes for Russia within the first two months of office. These included trial by jury, the abolishment of capital punishment and exile, removal of discrimination and the initiation of the eight hour working day. Enforcing these legislative changes, meant the Provisional Government won some popular public support, and ensured its survival for a short length of time. However unless the government could do something about Russia's state of crisis, the new legislation would mean nothing. The Government had inherited an accumulation of problems from the Tsarist regime, chiefly amongst them was the unpopularity of the war. ...read more.


The Russian public believed this decision was unwarranted since the food was desperately needed more in the cities and the majority of the Russian public did not want the war to continue. The peasants were also clamouring for greater land distribution. The Provisional government promised this land to the peasants which never materialised. This caused severe discontent among the peasants. The Bolshevik Party appealed to their beliefs and offered them their land and food gaining immense support. The dissatisfaction of Russian society with the Provisional government meant they were easily aroused into drastic action by revolutionary groups. The First World War also had a devastating effect on the Russian economy. The Provisional government was unable to afford the war effort, inflation occurred and paper money had to be printed. This consequently meant that the workers could afford less making them even worse off. They had no money to buy the small high priced amounts of food that was available. The Bolsheviks were the only party against the War and consequently appealed to their beliefs. The Bolsheviks were also very sophisticated at infiltrating ideas into the Russian army that the soldiers were being used as 'common fodder', fighting in a war which only served the interests of the Russian upper classes. This was important in raising anti-war opinion and consequently the popularity of the Bolsheviks. The Provisional Government was forced to carry on with the war even if it was against the majority of the Russian public's beliefs. If Russia was going to withdraw from the war then the military personnel would have returned and probably would have joined the Petrograd Soviet. With this extra support the Petrograd Soviet could have ultimately controlled the military, consequently their power would have increased and the Provisional Government would not have the power over Russia to implement its ideas. However, the Provisional Government's decision to carry on with the war increased the support of the anti-war Bolsheviks. ...read more.


He emphasised that the war was a war of Capitalist Imperialism, and that the government were participating in the slaughter of millions of Russian men in the war. Lenin was also able to get Trotsky on his side, and through Trotsky's fast organisation of the Red Guard he made it possible for a Bolshevik Revolution to occur quickly and effectively. However it has to be argued that the action undertaken by Lenin inevitably led to the revolution and not the Kornilov revolt as Kerensy claimed. The results of the municipal elections in Moscow show that the Bolsheviks cumulated 49.6% of the seats, occurring in 1917, before the Kornilov revolt. Lenin's written works 'fskra' about a Marxist revolution and all of his revolutionary ideas made a Bolshevik revolution inevitable before the Kornilov revolt. A long-term problem constantly led to a number of short-term problems which acted as a powerful catalyst to a further revolution. Lenin's oratory, personality and leadership skills led to triggers leading to the Bolshevik revolution. Trotsky's organisation and use of the Red Guards, and the effects of the Kornilov Revolt, August 1917 were the triggers. As Lenin's political acumen acerbated these factors Kerensky thought of a plan to get people on his side which was the Kornilov Revolt but unfortunately it ended up backfiring on him. After the Kornilov Revolt change was inevitable, though Kerensky could have taken more effective action in stopping a Bolshevik Revolution. He could have discredited Lenin but Kerensky did not even attempt to do this. The support of the Bolsheviks was great enough to take power. Many people knew revolution was certain, but it specifically came in the shape of a Bolshevik Revolution because Lenin with his excellent oratory, personality and leadership skills was the only person who stood up and took control. Lenin gained the support of the public and got their mood of the time correct and so epitomised powerfully what the public wanted. Their needs were exemplified in his April Theses which was 'peace, bread and land'. 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. The Russian Revolution of October 1917 was potentially the most politically formative event of ...

    and any attack on each other, either individually or jointly with other Powers."4 However, the treaty was subject to secret additional protocols, in which the pact spoke of the spheres of influence, which would be of great significance towards the end of the period, and outlined territorial borders of which

  2. Lenin and the Bolshevik revolution.

    In so doing, the potential leadership qualities of these other individuals were, perhaps, obscured. Corresponding to the second question asked in the model, it will be shown that Lenin faced an open field, full of potential competitors for the reins of power.

  1. Stalins Russia, 1924-53 revision guide

    * Trotsky's personality was a handicap; he was highly intellectual and impatient of people of lesser ability. He was arrogant and as a result he was not liked. * Trotsky did not at first see the need to make alliances.

  2. How far was the Russian Japanese war of 1905 the cause of the 1905 ...

    The half-hearted concessions and incompetence of the Tsar did not help them. For instance, the idea of following America and make use of the 'virgin land' in Siberia for agriculture was a failure. Out of a huge peasant population of nearly 97 million, only 750,000 migrated.

  1. The Rightwanted a strong man to be leader and many placed their hopes in ...

    and Left and had no choice but to appeal to the Left for help. He was therefore forced to allow for the re-arming of the Red Guards and had to call on workers, soldiers, and sailors to come to the defence of the Provisional Government.

  2. How far do you agree that the Russo Japanese war was the biggest cause ...

    to participate in the government of the country was a senseless dream. This angered a huge number of people in Russia. For many the Zemstva was the only way for their issues to be heard never mind the slight possibility of them being addressed.

  1. How far was the Provisional Government of Russia doomed from the start?

    A key issue that was faced by the provisional government was its legitimacy, they had not been elected into power by the whole nation and therefore were not seen as the rightful leaders of Russia, and this problem they would contend with till their downfall.

  2. The Bolsheviks were able to seize power in October 1917 mainly because of the ...

    It provided a major boost for Bolshevik morale as he introduced his manifesto ?April Theses? in which he described the Provisional government as representing the bourgeois or middle class stage of revolution which would move to a second stage of revolution where power would be transferred to the workers and peasants.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work