• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Schlieffen Plan

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Schlieffen Plan The Schlieffen plan was created in 1905 by the German General Alfred Von Schlieffen. The main idea of the plan was to deal with a two-front-war, fighting the French in the west and the Russians in the east. If the Schlieffen plan had of worked it was thought that the war would have been over by the end of 1914. A main factor of the Schlieffen plan was that one front would have to be closed quickly as the German army wasn't strong enough to win a war on two fronts. Schlieffen instructed that the Germans should focus a greater amount of their army to fight the French in an all out attack, whilst in the east the remainder of the German army would be fighting a defensive war against Russia. Schlieffen surmised that it would take about six weeks for the Russians to get their army fully mobilised so it would only require a smaller army to keep the Russians at bay until the rest of the army could be transferred to the east by train. Schlieffen stated that Germany would need to take Paris and knock France out of the war. The way that Germany would take control of France was simple but risky. Germany would require a very strong northern army and a much weaker southern army; the northern army would need to storm through Belgium to avoid the ...read more.

Middle

army would have to split to fight France and Germany, this would mean Germany would be fighting a war on two fronts and the plan stated that Germany could not win a war on two fronts. Thirdly the Schlieffen plan assumed that Britain would not get involved in the fighting. Schlieffen did not take in to account that Belgium was neutral( which meant that it was free from the ties of other countries and safe from attack or invasion), and that Britain had promised to protect its neutrality as long ago as 1839. The Schlieffen plan ordered, for the sake of speed, huge numbers of trains carrying soldiers, equipment, supplies and horses to cross the Belgium frontier immediately. This meant Belgium neutrality would be broken. Also according to the Schlieffen plan France would try to attack their boarder with Germany and wouldn't protect Paris. Because of this the plan instructed that the army would swing around Paris and then chase the French army from behind to catch them off guard. If France attacked the German army head on their way to Paris it would mean they would be slowed down which would lead to again stopping the Germans from defeating France in the time allowance of six weeks. As well, one of the main things that Germany assumed was that the Schlieffen plan would still work and be effective after nine years. ...read more.

Conclusion

After that Von Molke decided to cut inside Paris, because of the threat of the French and British army, rather than swing down around it. This meant that the Schlieffen plan had been ignored and the Schlieffen plan wasn't that flexible so if certain aspects were not carried out it would more than likely fail. One of the main reasons the Schlieffen plan failed was due to the plan being suited to old fighting tactics of cavalry charges and all out attack, not trench warfare and machine guns. In conclusion the Schlieffen plan failed because it assumed too much. It assumed that Russia would take six weeks to mobilise. This lead to a big failure in the plan because Russia was mobilised before the six weeks so Germany ended up fighting a two front war that was doomed from the start. Also the Plan didn't account for the entry of Britain in the war, this was their biggest downfall as it meant they were fighting against a lot more soldiers than they expected. A small but important factor was the Belgium put up a lot more resistance which slowed them down. An old German General called Helmuth von Moltke said "In war there are usually three courses of action open to the enemy, and he usually chooses the fourth". This relates to the Schlieffen plan because the plan assumed that countries would do certain things and the countries didn't always do what had been expected of them. Ashley Whitfield 10W ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Explain how the Schlieffen Plan was meant to work?

    This was the last resort for the generals trying to break the stalemate. The war on the Western Front was a new kind of warfare. No one had experienced war like it before. Everyone had to adapt. The most obvious new feature of this kind of warfare was the system of the trenches.

  2. The Marshall Plan.

    The Marshall Plan speech was deliberately low-key and no master plan was enunciated; the speech had just the right degree of vagueness to require European action, yet the right degree of specificity to excite it. In time, the Marshall Plan program that evolved from the planning of the first half

  1. Essay on the Schlieffen Plan

    With extra men the army could of by-passed the area. The problem this created for the Germans was that it went against the whole point of the plan: a fast, punch. It also allowed Russian forces valuable time to mobilise.

  2. The Schlieffen Plan

    The political cartoon is also an example of propaganda. 2. Compare and contrast the nature of the German request for passage through Belgium as depicted in Source C and Source D. (6) The nature of the German request for passage through Belgium as depicted in Sources C and D shows

  1. Explain how the schlieffen plan was meant to work The schlieffen plan was concocted ...

    The blockading of German ships starved Germany of food water and war supplies. Germany had to practically surrender. Their soldiers were starving and out of energy making it harder for them to fight. To take out the German forces all they needed now was force.

  2. The Schlieffen Plan and the Reality

    and threaten to destroy it as it contained world famous landmarks such as the Eiffel Tower and was also where their main political headquarters was. They planned to defeat France inside six weeks which seemed an easy task on paper for the Germans as they had a significantly larger army

  1. The failure of the Schlieffen Plan - Stalemate.

    Tank: Introduced in Somme; Allied High Commands unsure of how to use them successfully * Cambrai, Nov. 1917, 278 tanks, British army advanced 10 kms in 6 hours, 4000 casualties. * Third Battle of Ypres: 3 months at cost of 250,000 men - incorrect conditions & tactics for tanks ?

  2. History - Reasons for German defeat 1914 - Factors - Schlieffen Plan

    Many believed the war was lost when the Spring offensive was lost. 4) The Royal Navy had defeated German U-boat attempts to halt supplies by using a convoy system. The U-boat convoy system was stopped successfully by the Royal Navy in 1917 and sent a shock wave to the German

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work