• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12

Strategy in Cortes' conquest of Mexico

Extracts from this document...


Kurt Wintje HIST 386R Prof. Brown 11/27/07 Strategy in Cort�s' Conquest of Mexico Informed primarily by Spanish accounts, the traditional historical view of Cort�s' victory over the Aztec Empire is that of the inherently superior and better-armed Spanish defeating the numerically superior, but technologically and morally inferior Aztecs forces. Inga Clendinnen, for one, explains the Spanish conquest in cultural terms. According to Clendinnen, the Aztecs were defeated because their traditional societal view on the nature of warfare and its modes of termination made them incapable of defeating the Spanish forces led by the innovative and cunning Cort�s.1 However, the recent availability of Aztec and other native accounts of the conquest call these interpretations into question. Concurrently, a new wave of contemporary Aztec scholars argue that the motivations for Aztec imperialism are complex and multifaceted, but political and economic concerns dominated, just like any other empire.234 Therefore, it is best to examine the Aztec Empire just as one would the Roman Empire, or any other imperial system. Viewed through this lens, it will be argued that Cort�s' successful employment of military strategy and techniques were the critical determinant in the battle for the Aztec Empire. Other historical interpretations overlooked the role of strategy in the Aztec response to Cort�s, but it will be argued that Cort�s, as well as the Aztecs, conducted war within an overarching strategic plan. As leader of the Aztec Empire, Montezuma's primary objective in the region was to consolidate and further expand his power base by bringing rival factions under Aztec control and compel the payment of tribute.5 The Aztecs used conquering wars, where Aztec warriors attacked and quickly overwhelmed the enemy and forced them into submission, but so called "flower wars" to achieve this end as well. Clendinnen and others have misinterpreted the "flower wars" as merely serving ritualistic aims, while other scholars described it as a training ground for Aztec soldiers. Hassig argues these "flower wars" were in fact a type of imperial war with important strategic objectives. ...read more.


The Emperor was not just 'he who commands', but also the 'heart of the city'."19 The power vacuum left the Aztec empire vulnerable not only to rebellion from the tributaries, but more critically, to organized attacks from Cort�s and his men. The military strategies and tactics of the Spanish and Aztecs became most apparent once the battle for Tenochtitlan commenced. This fighting began when Cort�s was away from the city and the Aztecs responded to the Spaniards' massacre of participants at a ceremony honoring the god Huitzilopochtl. Cort�s' deputy Pedro de Alvarado carried out the massacre in response to the report that there would be human sacrifices at the festival. Leon-Portillo's work contains a vivid account from the Aztec perspective of this massacre: "They attacked all the celebrants, stabbing them, spearing the, striking them with their swords...the blood of the warriors flowed like water and gathered into pools."20 Just as there was no strategic plan behind the Spaniards' attack on the celebrants, the Aztecs' response to the attacks occurred outside of the context of any organized plan or military strategy. The Aztec sources depict the uprising against the Spanish as an impromptu response to the slaughter. While hastily assembled, the Aztecs' response revealed signs of organization and clear purpose: When the news of this massacre was heard outside the Sacred Patio, a great cry went up: 'Mexicanos, come running! Bring your spears and shields! The strangers have murdered our warriors!' This cry was answered with a roar of grief and anger: the people shouted and wailed and beat their palms against their mouths. The captains assembled at once, as if the hour had been determined in advance.21 The Aztecs attacked the Spaniards with all available weapons. They also made an effort to lay siege to the Spanish by widening and deepening the canals, blocking the roads with walls, as well as erecting bulwarks to prevent the Spanish from breaking out. ...read more.


causes of Cort�s' defeat of the Aztec Empire have been a much debated topic among historians, but it is necessary to begin this investigation holding the assumption that the conflict consists of two relatively matched, rational opponents, both conducting warfare with an overarching strategic plan. In so doing, one will come to the conclusion that Cort�s' successful employment of military and techniques, as well as strategic mistakes by the Aztecs, were the critical determinant in the outcome which saw the Aztec Empire, and all its riches fall into the hands of Cort�s. Notes 1 Inga Clendinnen, "Fierce and Unnatural Cruelty: Cort�s and the Conquest of Mexico" Representations, No. 33 (1991): 93-94. 2 Ross Hassig, Aztec Warfare: Imperial Expansion and Political Control (Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 1988), 12. 3 Michael Smith, The Aztecs (Cambridge: Blackwell Publishing, 1996), 15-16. 4 Hugh Thomas, The Conquest of Mexico (London: Hutchinson Publishing, 1993), 35. 5 Ross Hassig, "Aztec Flower Wars" Military History Quarterly, No. 8 (1996): 10. 6 Hassig, "Aztec Flower Wars", 20. 7 Hernando Cort�s , Five Letters of Cort�s to the Emperor, trans. J Bayard Morris (New York: W.W Norton & Co., 1969), 43. 8 Hassig, "Aztec Flower Wars", 11. 9 Smith, 71. 10 Miguel Leon-Portilla, The Broken Spears: The Aztec Account of the Conquest of Mexico (Boston: Beacon Press, 1992), 55. 11 Smith, 78. 12 Smith, 80. 13 Hassig, Aztec Warfare, 242. 14 Hassig, Aztec Warfare, 243. 15 Cort�s, 53. 16 Cort�s, 73. 17 Hassig, Aztec Warfare, 244. 18 Thomas, 308. 19 Thomas, 309. 20 Leon-Portilla, 75. 21 Leon-Portilla, 77. 22 Thomas, 397. 23 Thomas, 400. 24 Thomas, 401-2. 25 Smith, 277. 26 Smith, 280. 27 Hassig, Aztec Warfare, 245. 28 Thomas, 488. 29 C. Harvey Gardner, Naval Power and the Conquest of Mexico (Austin: University of Texas Press, 1956), 192. 30 Gardner, 196. 31 Thomas, 490. 32 Hassig, Aztec Warfare, 141. 33 Leon-Portilla, 123. 34 Thomas, 407. 35 Hassig, Aztec Warfare, 149. 36 Smith, 283. 37 Smith, 283. ?? ?? ?? ?? 13 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Other Historical Periods section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Other Historical Periods essays

  1. Why Did The Wartime Alliance Break Down?

    At this meeting, Churchill showed how Stalin would obtain the Eastern Border of Poland as a, "Buffer State". Stalin believed he would have power over Eastern Europe and be allowed to do as he pleased with it. Roosevelt did not explain this to Stalin and therefore Stalin believed he and Churchill were on the same page.

  2. South African Heritage - Where we come from?

    Unit 7.2 Activity 1 1) Why are the fossils in the Karoo such a valuable record? The fossils found in the Karoo give us valuable insight into life millions of years ago.

  1. To what extent was Napoleon a Dictator

    job, because when you leave the employer would write about you, and this would normally not be a good reference making it harder to get a new job. These reforms were clearly defining people's rights, however are indicative of a dictatorship as it was largely illiberal.

  2. What was the impact of the Norman Conquest

    The Domesday Book is a statistical document and was used as an administrative tool; a basis for more decisive taxation of the Norman's new realm and to fund William's warfare. It involved the first kingdom-wide poll taken in Europe since the Roman era and it helped the Normans to integrate with their conquered territories.

  1. What was the short term significance of the Amritsar Massacre?

    The fact that the daily was met with great success implies that there was a strong nationalist feeling among the Indians. It is also important to note that the non-cooperation movement, which had failed by 1922, allowed nationalism to grow all over India as wider and deeper range of social groups had become articulate in public life19.

  2. The First English Civil War

    On 11 July he came down and invested Hopton's foot in Devizes itself. The Royalist cavalry, Hertford and Maurice with them, rode away towards Salisbury. But although the siege of Devizes was pressed with such vigour that an assault was fixed for the evening of 13 July, the Cornishmen, Hopton directing the defence from his bed, held out stubbornly.

  1. The Indian Mutiny

    This mean that the British had to be very careful with their relationships with the Indians, ensuring another mutiny did not take place. The Bengal Army was completely reorganised in an attempt to create a more united army, where betrayal was limited.

  2. In the context of India in the 1840s to 1947, how far can independence ...

    [2] Brendon, P. ?The Decline and Fall of the British Empire, 1787-1997? Vintage (2008) [3] Coohill, J. ?Indian voices from the 1857 rebellion? History Today (2007) [4] Coohill, J. ?Indian voices from the 1857 rebellion? History Today (2007) [5] Marshall, Prof. P. ?British India and the ?Great Rebellion? BBC History (2009)

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work