• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Study Sources A and C. Compare these sources as evidence for Hitler's style of leadership.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

(a) Study Sources A and C Compare these sources as evidence for Hitler's style of leadership. (30) Both sources A and C have a structuralist view of Hitler's leadership style however source A is not overly clear on its view. Source A says 'It is the duty of everybody to work towards the Fuhrer' this suggests that Hitler expects the people below him to keep the country running however also that they should believe he is a great force. The fact that people had to work towards him shows that he was a weak leader, not integrated into every detail of the running of the country which it is believe a strong leader should be. Source C is very strong within its view of Hitler's leadership style. ...read more.

Middle

This leads back to source A which mentions delegating. Without the people under Hitler making decisions, Germany would have fallen apart. Whilst this could be a sign of a strong leadership the fact that Hitler 'took the view that many things sorted themselves out' and that 'he disliked the study of documents' this suggests a weak leader of Germany. Source A suggests that the citizens of Germany did not see the chaos that seemed to linger below the surface. It tries to defend Hitler's weak leader ship in a speech justifying the lack of written orders from Hitler. 'The Fuhrer can hardly dictate from above everything which he intends to achieve'. This is saying he is not a weak leader but simply does not have the time to give orders to everyone but source C tells us ...read more.

Conclusion

The Secretary of food however would not of been top of Hitler's list of priorities and so he probably did not have full view of Hitler's leadership. Source C was written in 1964 after the war by Fritz Wiedemann. It was part of his Memoirs, this shows that it is some of the detail but not all so vital information could have been left out or forgotten. However he was Hitler's personal assistant meaning he was very close to Hitler and knew what Hitler did and how he reacted to things. He was one of the people that had full view of the style of Hitler's leadership. The sources indicate that Hitler's style of leadership was weak with much delegation involved. Some may argue that this was intentional but source C indicates laziness rather than intentional chaos. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Was Hitler a weak dictator?

    He used effectively diplomacy, and the continuous impossibility of big powers to stop him. Even policies like Appeasement were used in order to avoid a possible war because of the actions of a dictator. For example one of Germany's enemies was Soviet Russia, not only as a nation that could be a threat to them but also racial and historically.

  2. Hitlers Germany

    The French army had been organized for and conditioned to a stationary war. The fluid war of movement, imposed on it by the Germans, bewildered it. Above all, it lacked anti-tank guns, without which it was completely helpless against the German Panzers.

  1. Russian Revolution Sources Question

    But there is no doubt that Lenin had a huge impact on Russia and the Russian people. Without Lenin Russia would probably not of become a communist country in November 1917. He was the main person who encouraged the Russians to seize power, many thought they had to wait.

  2. Russian Revolution Sources Questions

    Lenin was concerned the personality crash would lead to problems in a power struggle between Stalin and Trotsky. The factors of Stalin being too rude, impolite and capricious could result in a split in the party. To safeguard the party from this Lenin's advice was to remove Stalin from his

  1. World War Two Sources Questions

    Stalin was well known for this. Photographs are also only an instant in time, and could be misleading in many ways (we don't get to see the whole picture). Because Stalin was renowned for his propaganda methods, it is probably that the picture was taken for such an effect.

  2. Study sources B and D. Compare these Sources as evidence for the reasons why ...

    "Access to Hindenburg was the key to power" The sources differ on some aspects - e.g. who is most to blame? Source B puts a lot of the blame on Von Papen, "Papen finally won him (Hindenburg) over to Hitler" However Source B is by a high ranking member of

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work