• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Study Sources A and C. Compare these sources as evidence for Hitler's style of leadership.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

(a) Study Sources A and C Compare these sources as evidence for Hitler's style of leadership. (30) Both sources A and C have a structuralist view of Hitler's leadership style however source A is not overly clear on its view. Source A says 'It is the duty of everybody to work towards the Fuhrer' this suggests that Hitler expects the people below him to keep the country running however also that they should believe he is a great force. The fact that people had to work towards him shows that he was a weak leader, not integrated into every detail of the running of the country which it is believe a strong leader should be. Source C is very strong within its view of Hitler's leadership style. ...read more.

Middle

This leads back to source A which mentions delegating. Without the people under Hitler making decisions, Germany would have fallen apart. Whilst this could be a sign of a strong leadership the fact that Hitler 'took the view that many things sorted themselves out' and that 'he disliked the study of documents' this suggests a weak leader of Germany. Source A suggests that the citizens of Germany did not see the chaos that seemed to linger below the surface. It tries to defend Hitler's weak leader ship in a speech justifying the lack of written orders from Hitler. 'The Fuhrer can hardly dictate from above everything which he intends to achieve'. This is saying he is not a weak leader but simply does not have the time to give orders to everyone but source C tells us ...read more.

Conclusion

The Secretary of food however would not of been top of Hitler's list of priorities and so he probably did not have full view of Hitler's leadership. Source C was written in 1964 after the war by Fritz Wiedemann. It was part of his Memoirs, this shows that it is some of the detail but not all so vital information could have been left out or forgotten. However he was Hitler's personal assistant meaning he was very close to Hitler and knew what Hitler did and how he reacted to things. He was one of the people that had full view of the style of Hitler's leadership. The sources indicate that Hitler's style of leadership was weak with much delegation involved. Some may argue that this was intentional but source C indicates laziness rather than intentional chaos. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Was Hitler a weak dictator?

    so strong army and the risk of having a war by middle 1930's would be devastating. When he made the Anschluss with Austria in 1938 thw whole world expected foreign intervention to start a war in that moment, it didn't happen and Hitler continued this tactic until Poland, when war was declared by the British.

  2. Hitlers Germany

    Hitler disagreed, believing that progress to full Nazi control through this approach would be too slow and the SA would get out of control from impatience. Strasser's position, however, was shared by others, creating the possibility of a split in the party.

  1. Russian Revolution Sources Question

    The famine of 1921, where millions died, was mainly due to Lenin's policies, in particular 'War Communism'. This meant that the government controlled industry and the economy, the aim was to keep the Red Army supplied with foods and weapons so it could win the civil war.

  2. World War Two Sources Questions

    If they are German, then they were put there to show people that the Russian army is strong and powerful, and have managed to round up the German troops and keep them under control. However, I think it is more probable that they are Russian.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work