• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Study Sources A and C. Compare these sources as evidence for Hitler's style of leadership.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

(a) Study Sources A and C Compare these sources as evidence for Hitler's style of leadership. (30) Both sources A and C have a structuralist view of Hitler's leadership style however source A is not overly clear on its view. Source A says 'It is the duty of everybody to work towards the Fuhrer' this suggests that Hitler expects the people below him to keep the country running however also that they should believe he is a great force. The fact that people had to work towards him shows that he was a weak leader, not integrated into every detail of the running of the country which it is believe a strong leader should be. Source C is very strong within its view of Hitler's leadership style. ...read more.

Middle

This leads back to source A which mentions delegating. Without the people under Hitler making decisions, Germany would have fallen apart. Whilst this could be a sign of a strong leadership the fact that Hitler 'took the view that many things sorted themselves out' and that 'he disliked the study of documents' this suggests a weak leader of Germany. Source A suggests that the citizens of Germany did not see the chaos that seemed to linger below the surface. It tries to defend Hitler's weak leader ship in a speech justifying the lack of written orders from Hitler. 'The Fuhrer can hardly dictate from above everything which he intends to achieve'. This is saying he is not a weak leader but simply does not have the time to give orders to everyone but source C tells us ...read more.

Conclusion

The Secretary of food however would not of been top of Hitler's list of priorities and so he probably did not have full view of Hitler's leadership. Source C was written in 1964 after the war by Fritz Wiedemann. It was part of his Memoirs, this shows that it is some of the detail but not all so vital information could have been left out or forgotten. However he was Hitler's personal assistant meaning he was very close to Hitler and knew what Hitler did and how he reacted to things. He was one of the people that had full view of the style of Hitler's leadership. The sources indicate that Hitler's style of leadership was weak with much delegation involved. Some may argue that this was intentional but source C indicates laziness rather than intentional chaos. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Hitlers Germany

    Five categories were drawn up: (1) major offenders, punishable by death or life imprisonment; (2) offenders, sentenced to a maximum of ten years; (3) lesser offenders, to be placed on probation; (4) followers who went along with the NSDAP; and (S)

  2. Russian Revolution Sources Question

    Both were skilful politicians who knew how to use their strengths to get what they wanted and both most importantly had strong enough characters and strong enough beliefs to control the world's biggest country. 2. Some think that Lenin was a modest man who had no personal ambition, Davis Shub

  1. Russian Revolution Sources Questions

    Lenin was concerned the personality crash would lead to problems in a power struggle between Stalin and Trotsky. The factors of Stalin being too rude, impolite and capricious could result in a split in the party. To safeguard the party from this Lenin's advice was to remove Stalin from his

  2. World War Two Sources Questions

    Stalin was well known for this. Photographs are also only an instant in time, and could be misleading in many ways (we don't get to see the whole picture). Because Stalin was renowned for his propaganda methods, it is probably that the picture was taken for such an effect.

  1. The Impact of Stalins Leadership in the USSR, 1924 1941. Extensive notes

    A politicisation of life (all activity was given a political slant. Citizens did not have the freedom to behave as individuals). 4. A social structure that in theory allowed for quality of all people. However in practice the Communist Party dominated all aspects of life ï those with senior positions in the party had the most privileges.

  2. Study sources B and D. Compare these Sources as evidence for the reasons why ...

    The provenance of the sources must be considered - Source B, as discussed, was written in 1946, over a decade after the event, and given as evidence at the Nuremburg trials. The writer of the source may have forgotten the details, or is looking back on it in a different light - justification.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work