• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The collapse of the USSR was caused by internal problems and had nothing to do with the Cold War. Assess this view.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

?The collapse of the USSR was caused by internal problems and had nothing to do with the Cold War?. Assess this view. In 1991, after over half a century of communist rule, the USSR ceased to exist as a political entity after many years of decline. This statement asserts that the cause for this cessation was only due to the effects caused by issues, policies and the framework within the USSR itself, and had absolutely no relation with regards to the external problem of the Cold War - defined by Ann Lane as a state of tension, conflict, hostility and competition which characterized US-USSR relations though not amounting to an actual war; this subscribes to the Soviet Initiative school of thought. However, this statement is unfair insofar that the collapse of the USSR was not only the result of trouble within its territorial boundaries, but rather a combination of factors both internal and external, including the foundational weakness of the Soviet economic system coupled with the long term pressure brought forth by the US policy of containment, the Reagan Doctrine as a catalyst, the turning point in USSR?s history with Gorbachev?s reforms and finally the immediate effect of the August 1991 coup d?etat that characterized the USSR?s decline. ...read more.

Middle

In addition, it was the product of external factors, derived from the Cold War, that served as a catalyst for the USSR?s decline and eventual disintegration. The Reagan Doctrine, a strategy orchestrated and implemented under the Reagan Administration which defined USA?s foreign policy towards the USSR, exerted external pressure towards the USSR and thus exacerbated the the latter?s decline. Star Wars, introduced in 1984 as part of the doctrine, was an advanced defense system which relied on a combination of ground and space based systems. This breakaway from nuclear warfare which the USSR just managed to achieve parity with the USA alarmed the USSR, causing her to rapidly ramp up her military spending, exacerbating the strain on her already flawed and stressed economy. Additionally, the policy of rollback as part of the doctrine resulted in USA?s covert intervention in the 1979 Soviet invasion and occupation of Afghanistan only served to further exhaust the Red Army and the USSR?s resources, accelerating the decline of the Soviet Union. Thus, we can observe that the effort of the Reagan Doctrine which manifested as part of the Cold War would serve to catalyze the demise of the USSR, building upon the foundational weaknesses of ...read more.

Conclusion

In August 1991, the attempted coup d?etat by the hardliners met with resistance from the army and failed. This was significant as this was met with a huge outcry within the country, with massive protests throughout major cities within the USSR. This served as a clear indication that the the people overwhelmingly disapproved of the CPSU and their rule in the USSR, further chipping away whatever legitimacy they still had and spearheaded the independence of various Soviet socialist republics. As a result, we can distinctly observe that the failed 1991 coup served as a trigger, sparking off the result decades of factors both internal and external, causing the dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991. In essence, we can see that the collapse of the USSR was not an implosion, caused only by the result of inefficiencies, policies, and struggles that manifested at home. Rather, it was the combined effort of factors originating within its borders coupled with pressures which found roots externally, that provided the foundation, that catalyzed, that altered its course and finally elicited the collapse of one of the most colossal superpowers of the 20th century. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

4 star(s)

This essay points out most of the important factors in the USSR's downfall. There is a good balance between internal and external pressures. The main missing point is any reference to Eastern Europe- by 1948 the USSR controlled Eastern Europe and was exploiting its resources, but by the 1980s it was a political and economic liability (e.g. rising unrest in Poland).
But to get a really high grade the writer would need to weigh the argument in the question more. The US liked to claim that its hardline policies under Reagan had forced the USSR into an rams race it could neither afford financially or match technologically. Other historians would argue that the USSR knew it had to reform, and it was Gorbachev's attempts to do this that finally finished the USSR off. In nay case the final paragraph should develop this point rather more directly than it does, because that is what the question is asking.

Marked by teacher Phil Drake 17/03/2013

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Why did the U.S lose the Vietnam War?

    Protests took place across the United States. In 1970 shootings took place at Kent State University, described in more detail in the paragraph above. This was proved to be the 'first nail in the coffin' off President Nixon's resignation. In 1971, the pentagon papers were first published in the New York Times.

  2. Creative Writing - War.

    The allies were confident that if the Japanese were to attack the base, it would be by sea, not by land. Therefore, only a few other British Regiments were located in Malaya. We had been marching along the very same river for the last month.

  1. Can War Be Justified?

    However, it is controversial as to whether countries at which a war is not directed at should join that war: they often worsen the situation by interfering. Debating whether or not to go to war in defence of a neighbour presents a 'right vs.

  2. What were the Causes and Consequences of the Crimean War?

    This caused the Tsar to indicate to the British ambiguously that the Tsar might dismember the Turkish Empire. This led the British to carry out the policy that Palmerston proposed of containing Russia, which meant that they had to do all they could to keep Ottoman Empire from falling.

  1. To what extent did the foreign intervention influence the outcome of the Spanish Civil ...

    However, the USSR was never as committed to the conflict as Germany and Italy were and Stalin was only interested in supplying the right amount of armaments to keep the Republicans fighting. Furthermore, International Brigades supported the Republicans because they were against Nazism and Fascism and wanted to sustain democracy against the right wing threat.

  2. How did the Vietnam War Have an Impact on Canada

    Shields had deserted the US army in 1972 after serving for one year in Vietnam. When Shields travelled to the US in 2000, 28 years later, he was arrested and jailed in the state of Washington.7 The discrimination against US army deserters made by the Canadian Government was removed in May of 1969 under the Government of Pierre Trudeau.

  1. Who was responsible for the start of the Cold war?

    It is in fact very difficult for any real consensus to be agreed by historians and as a result it's necessary to instead weigh up the relative importance of factors involved with each incident at the start of the Cold war period.

  2. Why did tension increase in Europe between 1900 and 1914?

    But after Bismarck's resignation, his policy was dropped. * 1894: France and Russia signed the Dual Entente, which was intended to be a counterweight to the Triple Alliance of Germany, Austria-Hungary and Italy. * 1904: Britain and France signed The Entente Cordiale, the friendly agreement. It was not a treaty as such, but a settling of long-standing sources of friction.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work