• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The First world war.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Assignment 1: The First world war. Part A: In 1904, Britain and France signed a treaty called the entente cordiale; the idea of the treaty was to encourage a co-operation against the threat that Germany might pose. Russia also began to play a part in the alliance. The consequences of this, was that Germany began to suspect foul play and the possibility of an attack from the Russians on the eastern front and an attack from Britain and France on the western front. As a result, Alfred von Schliefen, the German army chief of staff, was given orders to design a strategy that could cope with a war on two fronts. In December 1905, he produced what later was called the Schliefen Plan. Schliefen's theory was that if the strategy was to work, France had to be dealt with very swiftly. If this could be carried out, by capturing Paris, then he believed Britain and Russia would be unwilling to continue the fighting. He calculated that it would take Russia six weeks to organize its attack on Germany; he took into account that Russia was a very large country with many men to call up, get organized, and mobilize. It was therefore vital that France was made to surrender before the Russians could mobilize and attack, so that the Germans could move their forces over to the East to meet the Russians. ...read more.

Middle

Barbed wire was often left in more of a tangle after barrages, therefore preventing quick charges afterwards. Though the guns could be destroyed, weapon production was soon at a maximum and so too the munition productions, supplies were almost inexhaustible. As a result, the war soon became one of attrition each side trying to grind down the other. Attacks often failed to gain any significant ground, because of the difficulties of trench warfare. There were huge amounts of barbed wire in no mans land between the two opposing trenches, Attempts were made to clear the barbed wire with artillery, but this prevented surprise attacks. Reconnaissance aircraft and observation balloons could spot soldiers building up in reserve trenches. Weapons prevented the easy capture of trenches, and awkward ground conditions and shell craters, prevented effective support to the front line, any ground won was usually surrounded in a salient and lost again. Poison gas proved to be a very useful weapon in disabling large numbers of the enemy's troops but if the wind blew the wrong way both sides would have been affected. Part C: Tanks played a very big part n breaking the stalemate; they were used for the first time at the battle of the Somme. ...read more.

Conclusion

However, the allies retreated hastily and soon had the Germans stretched, meanwhile all the time, volumes of American support was arriving. The Germans also had suffered heavy losses during the break through and had no reserves to call up. The Germans had ended trench warfare, but the allies had gained the advantage. It was only a matter of time before the allies had overrun the Germans pushing them back to the Hindenberg line. This almost decided the outcome of the war, because soon after the Germans asked for an armistice, as they new they could not possibly continue the war. Overall, all the reasons were important, as they all gave a combined outcome, in that the stalemate was broken in the allies favor. For example, the German offensive may have been a major changing point in the war and sealed the fate of the Germans and turned it into an open war. However, there might have never been a German offensive. Had the blockading of the German ports not happened, the Germans would have not been so eager to end the war. If the Americans had not entered the war, the Germans might have been more successful in the Ludendorff offensive. The tanks provided the British with a strong offensive and they therefore might not have been so potent in attack. Without a combination of all of these factors, the stalemate might not have been broken. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Why was Germany Defeated in the First World War?

    by the Allied Powers however, these were overcome by obtaining resources from the occupied countries of France and Belgium. These countries had vast supplies of coal and iron ore. As the war went on, Germany realised that it had a very large shortage of military back up.

  2. The Prelude to the 1975 War and the Cairo Agreement.

    If the guns were converged, as stated by the Israeli forces, there should have been only one main point of impact. The pattern of impacts is inconsistent with a normal overshooting of the declared target (the mortar site) by a few rounds, as suggested by the Israeli forces.

  1. How Significant were the Normandy landings in Defeating Germany in World War Two?

    way in which the text had been written; it comes across although D-Day was achieved in such little time. This is true but the advancement of the troops from Normandy to Paris did come with a bit of a struggle at some areas (e.g.

  2. The years between 1914, when the front trench lines were established in 'the race ...

    that was sent to France in 1914 (164,000) was extremely small compared to the LOOK HERE! German soldiers on the Western Front and the LOOK HERE! French soldiers, this was because the British army was used to control its empire while Britain's European partners armies were needed to engage the huge continental army's.

  1. Was the entry of the USA into the First World War in 1917 the ...

    they had done earlier in the war, and the Allies always stood a better chance of victory in future. Another major impact on the final outcome of the war was the failure of the U-Boat campaign. The aim was to eliminate Britain from the war by destroying their ships and preventing food getting to Britain.

  2. Britain and the First World War

    This advertisement presents us with a picture of a British soldier standing above a trench saying 'Time for one more'. This means there is always time for one more attack on enemy lines.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work