• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The First World War was the result of a badly mismanaged Balkan crisis in the summer of 1914 rather than the product of long-standing rivalries between the great powers

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"The First World War was the result of a badly mismanaged Balkan crisis in the summer of 1914 rather than the product of long-standing rivalries between the great powers" After four years of reckless destruction and bloodshed the European continent had fallen to four once proud dynasties that brimmed revolutionary noises and political chaos that shook the world into disbelief. Such a war it was that it gradually involved most countries in the world but most notable were those in Europe. Millions died fighting this war, many killed from bombs, missiles and bullets and others from disease in the terrible trench systems. This was that was neither ordinary nor glorious it was war full of "blood and anguish", "a war to end all other wars" it was the First World War. Almost a century later the cause of the First World War has been a much-debated issue by many historians who have not yet come to general agreement. However many historians believe that the war was due to a contributing of factors, which can be divided into two categories, one being short term causes and the other being long term causes. Long term causes like imperialism took their course over years and years that contributed to conflict and growing tension, while short-term causes like the assassination of the Austro-Hungary prince Franz Ferdinand triggered the action of provoking the war. ...read more.

Middle

Convinced that their interests were threatened, the nations of Europe maintained large standing armies and increased their navy, which led to a naval race between the powers to win naval superiority. Britain stood proud with the largest and strongest navy in the world. Kaiser Wilhelm II admired the size of the British navy, he wanted to push forward the idea of an agreement with Britain in 1890, and he believed that Germany could be Britain's ally by showing Germany's support was strong and therefore crucial to her. In 1897 Admiral Von Tirpitz was appointed as head the German navy. Under Tirpitz the German navy greatly expanded after 1898, his theory was to build a navy large enough to inflict damage on an enemy sufficiently to deter a war. Germany was ambitious and wanted to become a naval power and would show she was worthy of Britain. However Germanys naval expansion threatened Britain's naval supremacy and thus diminishing Germany's intended friendship with Britain. Britain reacted by building up her navy too and produced her first Dreadnought battleship. These were heavily armed warships, which rendered previous ones obsolete. Britain's reaction to Germany's naval expansion led to an intensification of the naval race between the two powers. ...read more.

Conclusion

entered the war to regain her prestige. France entered in revenge in hope to retrieve her lost provinces Alsace and Lorraine. England in turn entered the war because an invasion of Belgium threatened her own security. These chain of reactions treats the mismanagement of the Balkans based on influences elsewhere. Although the mismanagement of the Balkans had a major effect it was not the one main reason, which led to the outbreak of war. What led to the summer of 1914 was a result of long standing rivalries fuelled by growing nationalism that were complicated further by the dangerous system of Alliances. The assassination of Franz Ferdinand provided a trigger cause resulting in the Balkan crisis; European powers were concerned with too many European issues to resolve the Balkan crisis. If it the Balkan crisis hadn't happened then war would probably have happened over something, European issues were deep rooted therefore war was inevitable. The leaders were na�ve when war did arrive; they were led to believe that it would be a short war and that it would "over by Christmas." No one contemplated that it would last four long years of each of the powers thought they would win, in the end no one came out best. Had they contemplated the consequence of a war, war may have been avoided. ?? ?? ?? ?? Salman. Hakim/ 12jt/ Mr Buckley ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Why did the Central Powers lose the First World War?

    Most of these nationalities wanted to gain independence and found the chance when Austria-Hungary was performing very badly in the war, by creating trouble and fighting against the local government. This therefore shows why the Central Powers lost the First World War but it can be argued that if The

  2. To What extent was German Foreign Policy responsible for the outbreak of general European ...

    Austria's determination to declare war on Serbia and to settle the internal problems that existed was also aided the tension and the eruption of war. However both Russia and Austria did not aim to create a European War; Austria wanted a localised war in the Balkans and the Russians reacted

  1. Who is to be blamed for the outbreak of the First World War?

    Russia was vitally interested in controlling the Dardanelles. Pan-Slavism and the feeling of an inevitable clash with the Germanic race also played a role in making war acceptable to St. Petersburg. The Russians must have felt that their prestige as leader of the Slavs would suffer if they again failed to support Serbia.

  2. Why did tension increase in Europe between 1900 and 1914?

    * 1907: Britain signed an Entente with Russia. Britain was now clearly aligned with France and Russia against the powers of the Triple Alliance, Germany, Austria and Italy. * This effectively meant that Europe was now divided into two armed camps, each made up of three powers and each with

  1. The Cold War was a big rivalry that developed after World War II.

    During the cold war the trade was cut down - USSR economy felt crisis, was leading informational war with using propaganda. But the main factor of the war was the developing the strongest world power by arms race - production of nuclear, hydrogen weapons and missile.

  2. World War I: Could it have been avoided?

    of the larger oceanic world she must be made a 'World Power," so Germany needed to find some way of achieving this (Crowe, 274). Since nationalism was very heavily practiced in Germany, this aided and drove their dream of becoming a world power and entrance into the war because the people were not afraid to fight for their country.

  1. Why did Britain become involved in a European War in 1914?

    that should a general European war break out against Germany, it was not entirely inevitable that Britain would participate. Anglo-German relations had, however, been gradually deteriorating from as far back as 1898, and by 1902 Germany had come to realize that she could not rely on Britain both militarily or diplomatically.

  2. Account for the tensions between the Islamic World and the West

    When challenged by the interviewer, that he is prepared to criticise the Afghan system on the same issue, "he says yes, but we are in conflict with the Taliban regime."

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work