• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"The nations of Europe stumbled into war by Aug 1914" Do you agree?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

History "The nations of Europe stumbled into war by Aug 1914" Do you agree? Although this is a period of history of which there is as much controversy as there are resources, it is difficult to determine the beginning of the causes for war, or the motives of the Powers. Some historians would date the beginning of the amenity and discord between the European Powers that eventually led to "the Great War" from as early as the end of the Franco- Prussian war and the unification of Germany in 1871. Since then, there followed a period of peace, but during this period, tensions continued, sometimes even threatening to "boil over" into war. The start of the tensions, or the "long-term" causes of the First World War is in debate, but most historians date this back to the end of the Franco-Prussian war (1871). Not only was the defeat a blow to French prestige, but the peace treaty also mean the loss of Alsace and Lorraine, an area of much dispute for many centuries, caused many of the French harboured hostile feelings towards the Germans, and this public opinion may have put pressure on the French government to pursue a vengeful, aggressive foreign policy based on "revenge". Many countries, especially France, became cautious of Germany, a newly unified country that would soon become a formidable force in European affairs. ...read more.

Middle

and internal affairs, however, but by 1902, perhaps as its colonies and home, Britain, was affected by European relations, broke out of its isolationism by aligning with Japan in 1902. These long-term causes for war, which do, by all means explain why there should be resentment behind a war, does not explain why the war broke out a particular time, or why the Powers allied as it did. At this stage, although to many, war seemed inevitable and only a matter of time, improved communications and relations between the Great Powers was not impossible, as the cordiality in early 1914 shows. However, although there was now feelings of animosity that may have affected international relations, they only really serve to illustrate the reasons for resentment. In themselves, the long-term causes are not sufficient to war over, or to cause a war of such large scale. None of them show that any one country had the aim of starting a war, although some, like Germany may have been prepared to go to war to achieve their means. Also, the Alliance system, which is often pointed out to be the Powers planning to go to war, have been overstated. Much of the "alliances" were merely understandings, sometimes even omitting any military related issues, that may have sought only better relations. The Anglo-French Entente Cordiale of 1904, for example, was simply an understanding. ...read more.

Conclusion

Europe was certainly preparing for a war by August 1914. Some even looked forward to it, inspired by Jingoism and by the years if resentment of other countries. However, war was not inevitable. The improved relations between Britain, France and Germany in early 1914 show this. Even after the July Crisis, no country went to war unwittingly or unintentionally. By this time, it is clear that most countries wanted war, perhaps to sort out internal problems or to end all the surmounting tension "by Christmas". Even after the July Crisis, war did not have to be an option as there was no formal military obligation to do so, nor were the Balkan problems so significant that the Powers have to go to war over hostility and possible war between Austria-Hungary and Serbia. Many even see Britain defending Belgian neutrality as a means of joining the war. Although it can be seen as some countries, such as France, had no other choice but to defend itself when Germany declared war on them, they still knew the implication of siding with Russia and by introducing conscription, they showed that they were prepared. I don't think that the nations of Europe "stumbled into war" as they did know what they were doing, many wanted it, and they had other alternatives to avoid war, but most headed straight for it. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Why did tension increase in Europe between 1900 and 1914?

    * 1907: Britain signed an Entente with Russia. Britain was now clearly aligned with France and Russia against the powers of the Triple Alliance, Germany, Austria and Italy. * This effectively meant that Europe was now divided into two armed camps, each made up of three powers and each with

  2. Superpower Relations 1945-90

    o He was prepared to act forcefully against signs of rebellion within Eastern Europe (See notes below on Poland and Hungary, pages 10 - 11) o He was not going to take a more lenient attitude to West Germany. In 1958 he began a campaign to force the Allies out of West Berlin (See pp 12).

  1. How And Why Did Britain Survive The War From 1940-1943?

    Now convoys were given air support throughout the Atlantic. The next solution was to develop anti-submarine frigates that could be added to the escort groups. These frigates kept the U-boats submerged and so made them slower and less effective. A major new weapon was developed to destroy the U-boats, depth

  2. The Prelude to the 1975 War and the Cairo Agreement.

    The combat was described by witnesses as being of unrivaled intensity in twelve years of war, with the militiamen using formations of Soviet-made T-54 tanks that Syria had supplied to both sides. Five days of combat caused an estimated 700 casualties and set much of West Beirut aflame.

  1. American History.

    - After the GR, colonists thought - hey, let's rebel too - so they jailed Andros and declared their loyalty to William and Mary. But W&M also wanted tighter control, so they didn't give the rebellions their sanction and instead issued new charters, which destroyed many New England traditions.

  2. How Stable Was the Tsarist Autocracy in 1914?

    Worse still, the Autocracy was being threatened by these strikes in its capital city. "If the modernity and concentration of labour which St. Petersburg epitomised were the pattern of the future, the prospects for urban stability were poor." Even further, the Revisionists undermine the Liberal view point, by providing opposing facts to what the Liberals say.

  1. Why Was The Great War Not Over By Christmas 1914?

    in order to try to cross easily across its flat land. This enraged Britain, as it wasn't fair to use the Belgians as an advantage in the war when they were neutral. Consequently the British Expeditionary Force (BEF) was sent out.

  2. "To what extent is it fair to say Europe "Stumbled" into a war in ...

    First of all was the multitude of extremely detailed military plans against possible enemies, of which the notorious Schlieffen plan is a perfect example. Next were the many assurances, using martial language, of Germany to Austria, with the Kaiser, for example, saying to Franz-Joseph "You can be certain I stand

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work