• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"The nations of Europe stumbled into war by Aug 1914" Do you agree?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

History "The nations of Europe stumbled into war by Aug 1914" Do you agree? Although this is a period of history of which there is as much controversy as there are resources, it is difficult to determine the beginning of the causes for war, or the motives of the Powers. Some historians would date the beginning of the amenity and discord between the European Powers that eventually led to "the Great War" from as early as the end of the Franco- Prussian war and the unification of Germany in 1871. Since then, there followed a period of peace, but during this period, tensions continued, sometimes even threatening to "boil over" into war. The start of the tensions, or the "long-term" causes of the First World War is in debate, but most historians date this back to the end of the Franco-Prussian war (1871). Not only was the defeat a blow to French prestige, but the peace treaty also mean the loss of Alsace and Lorraine, an area of much dispute for many centuries, caused many of the French harboured hostile feelings towards the Germans, and this public opinion may have put pressure on the French government to pursue a vengeful, aggressive foreign policy based on "revenge". Many countries, especially France, became cautious of Germany, a newly unified country that would soon become a formidable force in European affairs. ...read more.

Middle

and internal affairs, however, but by 1902, perhaps as its colonies and home, Britain, was affected by European relations, broke out of its isolationism by aligning with Japan in 1902. These long-term causes for war, which do, by all means explain why there should be resentment behind a war, does not explain why the war broke out a particular time, or why the Powers allied as it did. At this stage, although to many, war seemed inevitable and only a matter of time, improved communications and relations between the Great Powers was not impossible, as the cordiality in early 1914 shows. However, although there was now feelings of animosity that may have affected international relations, they only really serve to illustrate the reasons for resentment. In themselves, the long-term causes are not sufficient to war over, or to cause a war of such large scale. None of them show that any one country had the aim of starting a war, although some, like Germany may have been prepared to go to war to achieve their means. Also, the Alliance system, which is often pointed out to be the Powers planning to go to war, have been overstated. Much of the "alliances" were merely understandings, sometimes even omitting any military related issues, that may have sought only better relations. The Anglo-French Entente Cordiale of 1904, for example, was simply an understanding. ...read more.

Conclusion

Europe was certainly preparing for a war by August 1914. Some even looked forward to it, inspired by Jingoism and by the years if resentment of other countries. However, war was not inevitable. The improved relations between Britain, France and Germany in early 1914 show this. Even after the July Crisis, no country went to war unwittingly or unintentionally. By this time, it is clear that most countries wanted war, perhaps to sort out internal problems or to end all the surmounting tension "by Christmas". Even after the July Crisis, war did not have to be an option as there was no formal military obligation to do so, nor were the Balkan problems so significant that the Powers have to go to war over hostility and possible war between Austria-Hungary and Serbia. Many even see Britain defending Belgian neutrality as a means of joining the war. Although it can be seen as some countries, such as France, had no other choice but to defend itself when Germany declared war on them, they still knew the implication of siding with Russia and by introducing conscription, they showed that they were prepared. I don't think that the nations of Europe "stumbled into war" as they did know what they were doing, many wanted it, and they had other alternatives to avoid war, but most headed straight for it. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Superpower Relations 1945-90

    construct an atomic bomb to balance the bomb that the USA had developed in 1945. It continued until the 1980s. * In 1949, the USSR tested its first A bomb, four years after the USA first used the bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

  2. Why did tension increase in Europe between 1900 and 1914?

    Britain recognised French influence in Morocco and the French recognised British influence in Egypt. The two navies agreed to divide responsibility for European waters. In 1912 the British navy withdrew its forces from the Mediterranean and the French navy withdrew its forces from the Channel.

  1. Why Was The Great War Not Over By Christmas 1914?

    The Germans had strong evidence to suggest that it would probably take Russia around twelve weeks to construct their army and to be prepared for war whereas the Schlieffen Plan was based on logistics, so it was planned that the Germans would have defeated France in only six weeks.

  2. United Nations: The Wounded Dove

    But once again the UN had success in stopping the civil war. But the national elections which were held in Angola were not as successful because the UNITA rebels renewed fighting due to the outcome of the elections. The UN's came up with a compromise where Angola would have a

  1. Intelligence is a necessary but not sufficient condition for victoryin war. Do you agree?

    Since states do not want other states to know certain information, communications are often encrypted, with codes or ciphers, to make them illegible to all but the authorised recipients. Interpretation of Sigint, as will be seen in the intelligence success of the Battle of Midway, plays a crucial role in determining the contribution of intelligence.

  2. The Peace Settlements and the New Europe 1918-1923

    With the economic crisis following the war, the living conditions were low in all of Europe during the thirties, making it much easier for new leaders to gain popularity, as proven when fascism and communism arose. The war aims of the allied powers were mainly to put an end to the expansionist ideas of Germany.

  1. Why did Britain become involved in a European War in 1914?

    with France being an ally of Russia and Britain of Japan, both the British and French were concerned that that the war may escalate into Europe. They hoped to avoid this by settling other outstanding disputes by coming to some sort of understanding or agreement with each other.

  2. American History.

    The most significant differences include... The importance of religion - It was not until the 1690s that the Church of? England really took root in Virginia, and even then it was never an essential part of society. In New England, though, religion was central to all aspects of life; strict

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work