• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The popular myth of the battle of Britain quickly emerged during the early part of the war. However, not all later interpritations fully follow it. Why?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The popular myth of the battle of Britain quickly emerged during the early part of the war. However, not all later interpritations fully follow it. Why? Once France surrendered on the 17th of june, and britain rejected the negotiated surrender put forward by Hitler in july 1940, it was clear that Hitler would try to invade Britain, and that air superiority would be the key to this. Without air superiority Hitler could not safely transport his troops across the channel, but if Britain retained air superiority they could easily prevent the German Blitskreig land attack from taking place. Hitler set the date for 'operationsealion' on the 15th of september, and the Battle of Britain began. Hitler gathered together a huge fleet of ships and special barges to transport the army across the channel as well as gigantic gliders to airlift his paratroops. His airforce, the luftwaffe,consisted of 1,100 effective fighters, mostly messerschmitt 109s and 110s. The 109s were second only to the British spitfires. He also commanded 1,600 bombers, mostly derniers ad heinkels. The Britsh RAF had about 850 fighters made up of spitfires and hurricanes. The spitfire was the best fighter of all, the hurricanes were the third best. The popular myth of the Battle of Britain was first developed at the time of the battle and during the later stages of world war two. Most interpritations which were created during the war reflect the popular myth. Thepopular myth consists mainly of two facts; The Battle of Britainwas important, and was britains salvation and her "finest hour", it was also a great contributor to making sure the right side won the war. the second point it enforces is that the victory was due mostly to the efforts of the pilots who took part, they were "the few". This myth was widely accepted as the truth by most people and is still held strongly today. ...read more.

Middle

As the sources get further from the time of the battle of britain, there becomes less need for propogada , and the writer is also able to take a view in retrospect. the first interpritatin which differs from the popular myth of the bob is interpritation number 7, an article by sir arthur bryant in the Daily Graphic in 1944. Ath this point, the war was not yet over, but after the D-day landings the allies new they were goin to win the war, and so propoganda was much less important. This extract mentions the popular myth, as this was the largely supported view of the battle at the time and would have been against the publics view to omit this factor of the battle. It also mentions other factors which contributed to Britains vicory such as the use of radar and the well organised ground staff. This article was written by Arthur Bryant, who was known to be very traditional and patriotic in his views, this may have caused the interpritation to be baised, but probably would not have been much of a factor as he is a historian and so he owuld have wished to show a fair and even handed account of the events in order to maintain his reputation as a credible author. This article was very popular, and so must have refected the popular mood of the people at the time and appealed to their ideas, we know this because it was reprinted as a pamphlet later on. This article shows great differences to those of a few years before in that it brings in factors other than the importance of the pilots and also mentions the severe civilian casualties. The extract from Grand Strategy, an official history of the war authorised bythe government and written by JRM Butler in 1957. By this time the war had been over for years and so it would not need to be influenced in any way towards propoganda. ...read more.

Conclusion

The sources from the period during the war, all perpetuate the populare myth, and to a great extent, leave out vital factors in Britains survival. The sources are all extremely influenced by bais and the need for propoganda at the time especialy Chrchills speeches, this lessens their credibility significantly. To discount the wartime interpritations entirely would not give an accurate picture of events as these did reflect the popular mood of the people and were all first hand evidence. The bob was important in the survival of britain, which allowed them to facilitate the D-day landings, their survival was largely due to the RAF, as this was well organised and far superior to the Luftwaffe. the interpritations also fail to mention the aid of the people from other nations in the commonwealth, for example the first and third top scoring pilots were from checoslovkia and newzealand. The later interpritations are more even handed with no need for bais or propoganda, so they portray a more accurate picture of the events. I believe that although Hitler was intent on atacking Russia, the attack on Britain was still very important. I believe that German miscalculation was the main factor in ensuring Britains survival, as the British were near defeat, but the Germans did not know this so they halted the attack. I do not believe that the bob was totaly unimportant as sources 12 and 15 suggest. The British did not win a victory at the bob, they merely, aided by German miscalculation and preocupation with Russia, managed to fend off invasion and survive by the skin if their teeth. The military commanders such as Dowding were a great help in organising a defence, and the ground forces including radar helped slightly. though the pilots won many air battles, this was mainly due to their superior planes, as some of the pilots had as little as two weeks training it cannot be said that they were experienced or any more skilled than the German pilots. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. "Why did Winston Churchill become so important as Prime Minister of Britain between 1940 ...

    country in wartime because of his past record in the First World War. They preached him to be "one for war and not peace" and subsequently "...a match for Hitler." Churchill also gained popularity from images created by the newspapers and radio.

  2. This graduation paper is about U.S. - Soviet relations in Cold War period. Our ...

    After extended discussion and some hard bargaining, the deal was made. (Poland was not even included in Churchill's percentages, suggesting that he was acknowledging Soviet control there.) At the time, Churchill suggested that the arrangements be expressed "in diplomatic terms [without use of] the phrase 'dividing into spheres,' because the Americans might be shocked."

  1. American History.

    to the whole area], which maintained Dutch forms of local gov't and (!) allowed religious toleration [each town could pick which church to support]. But it took until 1683 for an elected legislature to be formed. So basically, until the 18th century New York remained a relatively depopulated colony [grew slowly] w/few changes from Dutch rule.

  2. The Prelude to the 1975 War and the Cairo Agreement.

    However, the army had to break off the engagement-the 400 commandos who had spearheaded successive battles were exhausted and an ammunition shortage silenced the army's American howitzers. Aoun had to fall back on inferior Iraqi supplied Soviet artillery pieces. Military loss were heavy, by 1st March the Army had lost

  1. To what extent can Britain's policy towards Germanybefore Munichbe defended?

    Nevertheless I feel this would also help German interests greatly and encourage Hitler's expansion; Churchill also criticizes Chamberlain because he thinks that it would hearten Hitler to increase his territory even Overy states that Hitler's ambitions were greater than undoing the Treaty of Versailles.

  2. Why And How Did Britain Survive The War From 1940-1943

    330,000 men were rescued in just nine days and the heroism of these seamen helped in the survival of Britain. Although the new Prime Minster, Winston Churchill, put a brave face on things by saying "The tale of the Dunkirk beaches will shine in whatever records are preserved of our

  1. "Keep the dogs hungry, they will follow you". Such was in essence, the ruling ...

    Said bin Taimur was the sick man of Arabia; intervention was imminent, and Tariq was thought of as the surgeon. Why did the British choose to let Qabus' coup succeed? Was it, as a British diplomat in Muscat had the audacity to say, because "it (British policy)

  2. The Battle of Britain as a turning point in the Second World War.In the ...

    There was also the fact that a damaged aircraft was likely to ditch in the sea - whereas damaged RAF aircraft could limp home, or land somewhere friendly, and downed RAF pilots parachuted onto English fields.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work