• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Suez Conflict - Source related questions.

Extracts from this document...


7) Study the following interpretations of the Suez Conflict: i) Nasser was a ruthless nationalist determined to make Egypt the leading power in the Middle East. He was responsible for provoking the Suez War. ii) The Suez War was brought about by the collusion of Britain, France and Israel in a secret plan to attack Egypt and bring about the downfall of Nasser. These three powers are to be blamed for the Suez War. Which interpretation is best supported by the evidence in these sources and your knowledge of the period ? Explain your answer Even before the Suez crisis, the Arabs and the Jews hated each other and had been battling against each other in the "Arab-Israeli Conflict". Since the 1948-49 war however, a "Cold War" had descended on the conflict. The Suez Crisis was the event that rekindled the conflict's military flame. These are different interpretations of who was responsible for provoking the Suez Crisis, and there is evidence to support both these views. ...read more.


This point is clearly stating that there is a plan for Israel to attack Egypt, but we need to use point 7 in order to pin the blame onto Britain and France as well. Point 7 is "The provisions of the Protocol are to remain strictly secret and to enter into force as soon as they have been confirmed by the three Governments". We know that the other two of the three nations are Britain and France as all three nations have signed the protocol. This document is not available at the British record offices, as Eden sent Dean, the British representative for the agreement of the protocol, back to destroy all evidence of the protocol, as he only wanted a verbal agreement. Source I is the view of Anthony Nutting, Britain's Foreign Office Minister, on the subject of the Suez War. His sentences include "...we belaboured with our truncheons the assaulted and not the assaulter", which means that he is criticising Britain for Attacking Egypt instead of Israel. ...read more.


This displays a hint of dictatorship. Also it appears that he may also only want control of the canal so that he can attain the money that it produces. Source C shows a photograph of the ships Nasser had scuttled in the canal in order to block the canal. On the face of it, this seems to be reliable evidence that this was an aggressive action by Nasser in a bid to aid his takeover of the Middle East. However, Source G powerfully shows that this first opinion is not the correct one to take. Source C states that Nasser had the ships sunk on the 31st of October. Source G extracts points from the Protocol of Sevres. Point one states that on the night of the 29th Israel would attack Egypt in order to reach the Canal the following day. Nasser must have been provoked by the Israeli invasion into blocking the canal in order to stop it being captured. Centre Number - 25176 03/05/2007 Candidate No. 9014 Centre Name - Uppingham School 1 Candidate Name C.Bush ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Vietnam Coursework Sources Questions

    Photos were not the only kind of publicity getting through to the American public, films and articles were also released. Source I is an article that was written by a witness of the My Lai massacre. It describes the horrific treatment and murder of the Vietnamese who turned out to be completely innocent.

  2. Hiroshima Coursework This piece of coursework will concentrate on three questions, all source based.

    It only states one point of view, does not state if the Japanese would have ever surrendered. This source's intended audience would be people wanting to know why the Atomic bomb was dropped, especially the Japanese people. This source however, does link in with source E and how the Americans

  1. Europe and the Suez Crisis 1956 - To what extent was the military action ...

    Thomas stated purpose for this book is that "It is an interim Report."9 in which he has used materials available and interviewed people, mainly British, involved in the Crisis.

  2. The Arab Israeli Conflict -

    Today the Palestinian Refugee problem continues to grow, as the number of children born to refugees have increased in the camps in the belief of "raising an army to destroy the Jewish infidels", but the main problem for the Israelis to worry about is the continuation of Arab Nationalist Terrorist Organisations such as the P.L.O (Palestinian Liberation Organisation).

  1. Vietnam Sources Questions

    Although each picture helps to answer the question to an extent, they do not give an overall view of the importance of women during the war; they do not mention American or South Vietnamese women in the war, any real front line fighting nor any figures of the amount of

  2. The Arab-Israeli conflict.

    Gamal Abdul Nasser signed an arms deal with Czechoslovakia in 1955, Israel and the West became anxious that Nasser was allowing the USSR a grip in the Middle East. In fact Nasser had only made this arms agreement to gain fighter planes, bombers, guns and tanks and other weapons from the USSR.

  1. History Coursework 2003-Suez Crisis - What can you learn from Source A ...

    This Source may be biased considering it was Eden's speech to justify the stand he took over the Suez Crisis. Study Sources B and C. How useful are these two sources as evidence of Egyptian public opinion during the Suez Crisis?

  2. What can you learn form Source A about Anthony Eden's reasons for opposing Colonel ...

    What I have said so far is the usefulness of this source but some things make this source unreliable. First of all the crowd is not very big and so this may only be the few supporters he has. Also the picture is not very clear and due to this

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work