• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Suez Conflict - Source related questions.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

7) Study the following interpretations of the Suez Conflict: i) Nasser was a ruthless nationalist determined to make Egypt the leading power in the Middle East. He was responsible for provoking the Suez War. ii) The Suez War was brought about by the collusion of Britain, France and Israel in a secret plan to attack Egypt and bring about the downfall of Nasser. These three powers are to be blamed for the Suez War. Which interpretation is best supported by the evidence in these sources and your knowledge of the period ? Explain your answer Even before the Suez crisis, the Arabs and the Jews hated each other and had been battling against each other in the "Arab-Israeli Conflict". Since the 1948-49 war however, a "Cold War" had descended on the conflict. The Suez Crisis was the event that rekindled the conflict's military flame. These are different interpretations of who was responsible for provoking the Suez Crisis, and there is evidence to support both these views. ...read more.

Middle

This point is clearly stating that there is a plan for Israel to attack Egypt, but we need to use point 7 in order to pin the blame onto Britain and France as well. Point 7 is "The provisions of the Protocol are to remain strictly secret and to enter into force as soon as they have been confirmed by the three Governments". We know that the other two of the three nations are Britain and France as all three nations have signed the protocol. This document is not available at the British record offices, as Eden sent Dean, the British representative for the agreement of the protocol, back to destroy all evidence of the protocol, as he only wanted a verbal agreement. Source I is the view of Anthony Nutting, Britain's Foreign Office Minister, on the subject of the Suez War. His sentences include "...we belaboured with our truncheons the assaulted and not the assaulter", which means that he is criticising Britain for Attacking Egypt instead of Israel. ...read more.

Conclusion

This displays a hint of dictatorship. Also it appears that he may also only want control of the canal so that he can attain the money that it produces. Source C shows a photograph of the ships Nasser had scuttled in the canal in order to block the canal. On the face of it, this seems to be reliable evidence that this was an aggressive action by Nasser in a bid to aid his takeover of the Middle East. However, Source G powerfully shows that this first opinion is not the correct one to take. Source C states that Nasser had the ships sunk on the 31st of October. Source G extracts points from the Protocol of Sevres. Point one states that on the night of the 29th Israel would attack Egypt in order to reach the Canal the following day. Nasser must have been provoked by the Israeli invasion into blocking the canal in order to stop it being captured. Centre Number - 25176 03/05/2007 Candidate No. 9014 Centre Name - Uppingham School 1 Candidate Name C.Bush ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Hiroshima Coursework This piece of coursework will concentrate on three questions, all source based.

    Reading this source, the reader becomes aware that even Americans working directly for the President and people who should support every act the US government did. However, this source suggests that Japan would have surrendered regardless of the nuclear bomb.

  2. The Home Front - source related study

    their partners, who like 10,000,000 other British men had joined the armed forces. The factories were being manned by less employees than before who struggled to maintain output. It took The Great Shell Shortage of May 1915 to alert the government's attention to the reality that more workers were desperately required to increase the production of weapons and ammunitions.

  1. The Arab Israeli Conflict -

    A famous, but gruesome example of Israeli dictatorship was in the destruction of Deir Yassin, on the 10th April 1948, where 132 Zionist terrorists killed 250 men, women and children in the village. "The Jews used machine guns, then grenades and finished of with knives.

  2. The Arab Israeli Conflict - source related study.

    the aggressors and leaving Israel having to attack first due to their vulnerable position. 3. These sources certainly suggest that other countries must take some of the blame for the 1967 War. Source C should be relatively unbiased as it is from a British magazine, which is a neutral country.

  1. The Prelude to the 1975 War and the Cairo Agreement.

    The Lebanese Army was ripped into sectarian pieces. Army officers and troops entered into combat alongside the warring factions, while others remained under the nominal command of Army Chief Hanna Said. The latter commanded little authority even before the break-up of the army. Still others went home and did not take part in the fighting.

  2. Arab Israeli conflict - Source related work.

    start but we cannot say that the war would not have started when they were there because the tension between the two sides was growing. Another limitation to both sources, especially source D, is that they were from after the war and so they aren�t reliable in showing what the Arab and Israeli leaders felt at the time.

  1. The Arab-Israeli conflict.

    Another cause of tension was the movement of the junior judge in Jerusalem, Mohammed Amin al-Hussein, known as the 'Mufti.' This group eliminated Jewish settlers and also any Arab who tried to live with and work with the Jews. In return Britain allowed the Jews to set-up their own defence force, known as the Haganah.

  2. Europe and the Suez Crisis 1956 - To what extent was the military action ...

    in the UN, where their actions could be justified due to the Soviet veto. The British did accept the SCUA, but its impact on Nasser was destined to be negligible. With the end of the SCUA Conference, French and British Ministers, engaged in negotiations with their Egyptian counterpart and agreed to the Six Principles7 (see Appendix).

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work