• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Vietnam War

Extracts from this document...


History Course work The Vietnam War Charlie McQuillan 12E 1. Study sources 1 and 2. What do these sources tell us about the attitudes to the Vietnam War? Sources 1 and 2 show support for the war in Vietnam, and opposition to the war in Vietnam. Source 1 is from a school textbook on the Vietnam War. With a textbook, in general it should be neutral and factual. But could this article be taken out of context? We also need to know where and when this textbook was produced. The source, in itself, tells of the different people and their different views towards the Vietnam War. Source 1 also gives indications that there will be a lot more demonstrations against the war, as it says, " The 'FIRST' march on Washington against the War took place in December, 1964. Only 25,000 people took part in this demonstration but it was still the largest Anti-war demonstration in American War history." Source 2 is an opinion poll graph, showing trends in the support for the Vietnam War from 1965-1971. It shows overall support for the war, overall opposition to the war, and those who had no opinion about the war. In 1965-1966, the support for the war was more than that for both opposition to the war and no opinion to the war, put together. By 1967, the opposition to the war and the support for the war were about equal, at 45% of the population supporting each. But by 1971, the overall opposition to the war was more than that of both Support for the war and no opinion to the war together. This shows the change in public opinion towards the Vietnam War in the space of a 6-year period. 2. How reliable are sources 1,2,3 and 4 as evidence of American attitudes to the Vietnam War? Source 1 is reliable because it is taken from a textbook. ...read more.


(a) Sources 12 and 13 are photographs of Vietnamese people, including young children, in so much fear and suffering that we cannot even begin to understand how they must have been feeling. Source 12 shows 5 children running towards the photographer after an American Airforce Napalm attack. One of these Vietnamese kids has had her clothes burnt off her back and the Napalm is now beginning to burn her skin. They all seem to be in so much agony and suffering. The background of the photo is filled with bodies and blood spread out on the road. Some of the bodies are in pieces. Source13 shows a Vietnamese family about to be executed by U.S troops. There are children, babies, being shot for being 'informers' for the Vietcong. How could a child, let alone a baby be an informer working with the Vietcong army? Would a family man, a father, risk his life and the lives of his family to help the Vietcong? These are very reliable sources. Newspapers can portray the U.S troops as inhuman, and brutal for the way in which they dealt with innocent people. Also, the troops could be shown as brutal because of the way in which they killed children and babies, who were, undoubtedly innocent. These images would encourage a lot of Americans back home to support the anti-war movement. (b) Source 19 makes out that the anti-war movement is full of 'drop-outs' to society, and that they are 'hippies', who let their hair grow long, smoke 'pot' and they don't believe in fighting. The anti-war movement is mainly for 'hippies' who are drug addicts, cowards, scroungers and draft power burners. Adam Garfinkle agrees with Haggard in that he feels the anti-war movement is a cult symbol. Most of the young people who support the AWM do so because it is a sign of rebellion. Source 7 backs up Haggards few because it tells us that college students did take part in anti-war protests just because they were young and they believed that it was the thing to do to get recognised. ...read more.


He is in the media and would naturally want to make it appear better and so he attributes much to the media even though he is neutrally British. He goes as far as to say, 'One wonders if a democracy which has uninhibited television coverage in every home will be able to fight a war, however just'. Finally we have Source 18 to represent the military argument. Here is an American Colonel saying that, 'After supporting the American troop commitment for more than two years, by late 1967 public sentiment was win the damn war or get the hell out.' He also takes credit away from the media away from the media by saying that; 'To blame the media for this switch displays a fundamental ignorance of what America is all about'. History is a very hard subject because it is the study of the past. The past is constantly changing as we are given new accounts and evidence. Everyone's view of the past is different because everyone interprets things differently which gives us infinite amounts of answers to any question that is as general as this. And so my conclusion cannot give a definite yes or no answer as such. I can only give my opinion on the degree of impact that the AWM imposed. I believe it had a reasonable impact but that there were other factors that perhaps had a larger impact, such as the media or the enormous amount of money being wasted. But more importantly we can learn a lot for this event and these actions. The AWM showed the American government that its people would stand up for what is right. And the effect of the media was shown both to the American people and their government, cementing its place as a great influence on how the world would be run. These are the most important lessons we must learn from this because History is about learning from the mistakes of the past so that they may never be repeated again. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. The Vietnam War - source related questions and answers

    The plus points of this source would be that it shows two sides of the argument for and against continuation of the war. And that it shows us that the doves are the minority group. The limitations however are that what is said may be part of a speech and

  2. How was opposition to the Vietnam War portrayed in Contemporary Literature, Film and popular ...

    The aeroplane incident, which is the most shocking tactic used by the army, describes two prisoners thrown out at a height of 30,000 feet even though they complied with the officer's commands and answered the questions. Reliability of the account is affected harshly as the author does not state that he was witness to the event.

  1. American History.

    Polk [hard money Jacksonian, expansionist, slaveholder]. - So in the Presidential Election of 1844 Polk ran against Henry Clay [Whigs] and James Birney [Liberty Party, took votes from Clay] and beat them both. - Right before leaving office, though, Tyler got Texas admitted into the Union [December 1845] through a

  2. "The war on colour television screens in American living rooms had made Americans far ...

    Source H also has insufficient evidence to cause America to loose the war because of the source. The source is a cartoon for the British magazine 'Punch' published in 1967. In the cartoon we can see president Johnson was chopping up wood labelled 'A great society' on a train, being

  1. How was opposition to the Vietnam War portrayed in contemporary literature, film and popular ...

    the destiny of the many young men who were inexperienced and again as stated just figures, in this vietnam war. Another antiwar artist was Loretta Lynn. A relatively new artist on the scene in 1966 she was one of the first to stand up against the government and to recount the events happening in vietnam.

  2. Does Source C show that the anti-war protests described in Source A had an ...

    Deputy Commander in Chief of the National Liberation Front (a sector of the Vietcong). We know that a woman did do this job and it is unlikely that the photograph is staged. This is a very reliable source and it does show that women in Vietnam played major roles in the war.

  1. Vietnam Sources Questions

    Source N tell of how they brought Nixon in to rectify the situation, but they do not talk about who was the culprit of Vietnam. This may be because, as an American school textbook, it does not want to lay blame on a President and undermine the government's stature and respect.

  2. World War One Sources Questions

    such as 'morass of glue like mud', describing how he stood amongst ruins and 'mangled bodies' and particularly by using the image of the hands sticking out from the soil. However Sassoon is against all war so therefore his opinions may be bias but in the opposite direction to the artist in source I.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work