• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

This will be a speech in favour of the War on Iraq.

Extracts from this document...


Nathan Derry Coursework Original Writing This will be a speech in favour of the War on Iraq. Its purpose is for the East Norfolk Sixth Form Debating society, and will presented to them, when a topic of this nature arises. " Ladies and Gentlemen, I stand here in front of you today, to present the arguments, of why the war on Iraq is a just one. There are those among us who'd never support an American sponsored war; Instead, they'd prefer to criticise and pontificate form afar, enjoying the freedoms born of past wars. The rationale of these people for military inaction varies widely. For some, they harbour a deep anti-Bush, anti-Republican bias, and distrust anything directly from the White House. Others belong in the moral-relativism camp and view Saddam Hussein's regime, no different to that of any other Government, United States included. ...read more.


Saddam maintains his power through the brunt use of force, rather than that of benevolence or good will. Secondly, the idea of Saddam acquiring nuclear weapons may change the dynamics in the Middle East. Saddam ahs already demonstrated a willingness to use weapons of mass destruction when he sees it will suit his purpose- a nuclear bomb would just be another tool in his arsenal. I continue, the rebuilding of Iraq, in mine, and many others' opinions, is more than possible. Despite all the protests in recent times over 'nation-building', the fact is, and historical evidence shows, that it works. In fact, Japan, Italy, Germany and many more European countries, owe their current shape to American nation-building. Japan provides the best example. Back in the 1930's, Japan was a strong military force, feared by many, which invaded its' neighbours, committed widespread human rights violations, and ruined the lives and livelihoods of many innocent people. ...read more.


Why? Because morality often serves as an impediment to negotiation, earning scoffs and derisions from international diplomats. However, there is a legitimate issue of morality in this current conflict. I emphasise, Saddam is an evil butcher who has terrorised his people for far too long, and unfortunately, these people are simply incapable of defending themselves, without our assistance. We have it within out power to provide the people of Iraq with freedom, liberty and protection from a brutal government that orders torture, murder and rape against opponents. We can give these people a better tomorrow, more than they ever hoped possible. In conclusion, I say to you that instead of thinking of the deaths and harm that may arise as a result of the war every time it is mentioned, think and look on the positive side; Not only will the evil dictator, Saddam, be removed from his wrongful position, but people can live an easier life without the fear of death just around the corner. Thank you for listening" Nathan Derry ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. US President George Bush labelled Iran and Iraq as part of an "axis of ...

    other kinds of operations related to terrorism".60 Khodada claims that Saddam himself and his son were "directly connected" with the training61. It does, however, need to be noted that Khodada, who now lives in the United States, works for the Iraqi National Congress, an organisation established and funded by the US Government to bring about regime change in Iraq.

  2. The role of Saddam Hussain in serving the aims of America in the Middle ...

    Washington also worked towards igniting the Iranian revolution in 1978 through exploiting the popularity of Khomeini who used to live in Iraq and was very popular in Iran both amongst the people and the mullahs. Once Saddam Hussain became the strong man in Baghdad, he managed to discard al-Bakr and replace him as President of Iraq in 1978.

  1. The United Nations and the Iraq Conflict

    engage in securing and reconstructing the country."24 While Bush's coup in Iraq goes somewhat unjustified due to a lack of retaliation by the Iraqi regime and no findings of weaponry that breached Resolution 687,25 the United States and its allies go unpunished for their role in the war which was not directly granted to them by the UN.

  2. "The Controversy over the War with Iraq".

    Saddam has a long history with terrorism and after the United States found out that one of the hijackers met with Iraq intelligence before 9/11, Saddam became more responsible of the attacks. Most of presidents Bush's time in the year of 2002 was spent trying to revenge the attacks and how to get Saddam (Kraft, 2003).

  1. Discuss the tension and arguments over the justification of the Iraq war.

    Ali by many tabloids, both Chirac and Mr.Ali have gone onto national and international television claiming that a war is unjustified and that America and Britain are just taking out past frustrations (September 11th being given as a reason) these two very public figures taking their arguments to the media has just made Tony Blair and George W.

  2. Citizenship - compare " Show you don't want war" and "Iraq evidence is overwhelming".

    Another reason it is so much in the public eye is because world leaders are seemingly engaging in a war of words with each other, battle lines that have so far been drawn pit George W. Bush and Tony Blair against Jacques Chirac and the Iraqi public minister, nicknamed Chemical

  1. Why did Iraq invade Kuwait?

    1 barge operations platform New Zealand 50 medical soldiers and 2-C130's Niger 500 troops Oman 25,500 troops, 63 airplanes, 4 Exocet-armed ships Poland 1 hospital ship Qatar A squadron of Mirage F-1E fighters Romania 180 chemical warfare experts Saudi Arabia 118,000 troops, 550 tanks, 180 airplanes South Korea 5 C-130

  2. The case against war on Iraq.

    The truth of the matter is that Saddam Hussein has co-operated as fully as possible. No more could have been expected of him. We cannot expect Iraq to suddenly disarm in 60 days. The second basis for war is that any attack on Iraq would be a pre-emptive strike.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work