• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

This will be a speech in favour of the War on Iraq.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Nathan Derry Coursework Original Writing This will be a speech in favour of the War on Iraq. Its purpose is for the East Norfolk Sixth Form Debating society, and will presented to them, when a topic of this nature arises. " Ladies and Gentlemen, I stand here in front of you today, to present the arguments, of why the war on Iraq is a just one. There are those among us who'd never support an American sponsored war; Instead, they'd prefer to criticise and pontificate form afar, enjoying the freedoms born of past wars. The rationale of these people for military inaction varies widely. For some, they harbour a deep anti-Bush, anti-Republican bias, and distrust anything directly from the White House. Others belong in the moral-relativism camp and view Saddam Hussein's regime, no different to that of any other Government, United States included. ...read more.

Middle

Saddam maintains his power through the brunt use of force, rather than that of benevolence or good will. Secondly, the idea of Saddam acquiring nuclear weapons may change the dynamics in the Middle East. Saddam ahs already demonstrated a willingness to use weapons of mass destruction when he sees it will suit his purpose- a nuclear bomb would just be another tool in his arsenal. I continue, the rebuilding of Iraq, in mine, and many others' opinions, is more than possible. Despite all the protests in recent times over 'nation-building', the fact is, and historical evidence shows, that it works. In fact, Japan, Italy, Germany and many more European countries, owe their current shape to American nation-building. Japan provides the best example. Back in the 1930's, Japan was a strong military force, feared by many, which invaded its' neighbours, committed widespread human rights violations, and ruined the lives and livelihoods of many innocent people. ...read more.

Conclusion

Why? Because morality often serves as an impediment to negotiation, earning scoffs and derisions from international diplomats. However, there is a legitimate issue of morality in this current conflict. I emphasise, Saddam is an evil butcher who has terrorised his people for far too long, and unfortunately, these people are simply incapable of defending themselves, without our assistance. We have it within out power to provide the people of Iraq with freedom, liberty and protection from a brutal government that orders torture, murder and rape against opponents. We can give these people a better tomorrow, more than they ever hoped possible. In conclusion, I say to you that instead of thinking of the deaths and harm that may arise as a result of the war every time it is mentioned, think and look on the positive side; Not only will the evil dictator, Saddam, be removed from his wrongful position, but people can live an easier life without the fear of death just around the corner. Thank you for listening" Nathan Derry ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. The United Nations and the Iraq Conflict

    it is assigned to them in the reconstructing of Iraq.26 Brian Urquhart, a representative of the United Nations, stated that the UN's "objective, must be to achieve the rule of law on the international level as it has been already achieved on the national level."27 By developing an organization such

  2. The role of Saddam Hussain in serving the aims of America in the Middle ...

    She also concluded two things from this experience: First she must under all circumstances secure her oil supplies. Secondly, she must convulse America's dominion over the oil markets of the world and regain the initiative from her if she could.

  1. "The Controversy over the War with Iraq".

    Also after the attacks, President Bush had to find ways to keep the nation safer from terrorist attacks. The first thing implanted by Bush was the department of Homeland Security, which he previously opposed before September 11th, (Mitch, 2003). After the incident the FBI and CIA were criticized for not being prepared for the attacks.

  2. US President George Bush labelled Iran and Iraq as part of an "axis of ...

    Evidently the Kazakhstan Government decided against seeling the uranium to Iran. In the end the uranium was turned over to the US and spirited away in a clandestine operation.25 Chemical Weapons On the 3rd of November 1997, Iran ratified the Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC).

  1. The Prelude to the 1975 War and the Cairo Agreement.

    president to dominate the Maronite community, which would also increase Syria's weight in dealings with West Beirut. Gemayel dithered for a few weeks while he made last-ditch appeals to the Americans and Israelis. However, the Americans were already looking afresh at Syria as a factor for stability in Lebanon and the Israelis answered only with a contemptuous dismissal.

  2. Discuss the tension and arguments over the justification of the Iraq war.

    Ali by many tabloids, both Chirac and Mr.Ali have gone onto national and international television claiming that a war is unjustified and that America and Britain are just taking out past frustrations (September 11th being given as a reason) these two very public figures taking their arguments to the media has just made Tony Blair and George W.

  1. Citizenship - compare " Show you don't want war" and "Iraq evidence is overwhelming".

    Another reason it is so much in the public eye is because world leaders are seemingly engaging in a war of words with each other, battle lines that have so far been drawn pit George W. Bush and Tony Blair against Jacques Chirac and the Iraqi public minister, nicknamed Chemical

  2. Why did Iraq invade Kuwait?

    1 barge operations platform New Zealand 50 medical soldiers and 2-C130's Niger 500 troops Oman 25,500 troops, 63 airplanes, 4 Exocet-armed ships Poland 1 hospital ship Qatar A squadron of Mirage F-1E fighters Romania 180 chemical warfare experts Saudi Arabia 118,000 troops, 550 tanks, 180 airplanes South Korea 5 C-130

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work