• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

This will be a speech in favour of the War on Iraq.

Extracts from this document...


Nathan Derry Coursework Original Writing This will be a speech in favour of the War on Iraq. Its purpose is for the East Norfolk Sixth Form Debating society, and will presented to them, when a topic of this nature arises. " Ladies and Gentlemen, I stand here in front of you today, to present the arguments, of why the war on Iraq is a just one. There are those among us who'd never support an American sponsored war; Instead, they'd prefer to criticise and pontificate form afar, enjoying the freedoms born of past wars. The rationale of these people for military inaction varies widely. For some, they harbour a deep anti-Bush, anti-Republican bias, and distrust anything directly from the White House. Others belong in the moral-relativism camp and view Saddam Hussein's regime, no different to that of any other Government, United States included. ...read more.


Saddam maintains his power through the brunt use of force, rather than that of benevolence or good will. Secondly, the idea of Saddam acquiring nuclear weapons may change the dynamics in the Middle East. Saddam ahs already demonstrated a willingness to use weapons of mass destruction when he sees it will suit his purpose- a nuclear bomb would just be another tool in his arsenal. I continue, the rebuilding of Iraq, in mine, and many others' opinions, is more than possible. Despite all the protests in recent times over 'nation-building', the fact is, and historical evidence shows, that it works. In fact, Japan, Italy, Germany and many more European countries, owe their current shape to American nation-building. Japan provides the best example. Back in the 1930's, Japan was a strong military force, feared by many, which invaded its' neighbours, committed widespread human rights violations, and ruined the lives and livelihoods of many innocent people. ...read more.


Why? Because morality often serves as an impediment to negotiation, earning scoffs and derisions from international diplomats. However, there is a legitimate issue of morality in this current conflict. I emphasise, Saddam is an evil butcher who has terrorised his people for far too long, and unfortunately, these people are simply incapable of defending themselves, without our assistance. We have it within out power to provide the people of Iraq with freedom, liberty and protection from a brutal government that orders torture, murder and rape against opponents. We can give these people a better tomorrow, more than they ever hoped possible. In conclusion, I say to you that instead of thinking of the deaths and harm that may arise as a result of the war every time it is mentioned, think and look on the positive side; Not only will the evil dictator, Saddam, be removed from his wrongful position, but people can live an easier life without the fear of death just around the corner. Thank you for listening" Nathan Derry ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. The United Nations and the Iraq Conflict

    interconnected and interdependent, and membership to the UN increased, political regimes, religious insensitivity, economic barriers and military empowerment remained complex. While the formation of the United Nations and its organs were meant to eradicate global humanitarian issues, the member states within the IGO remained within the frame of mind of individual countries.

  2. The role of Saddam Hussain in serving the aims of America in the Middle ...

    These companies used to buy oil from the countries and the companies that produced it in addition to what they also produced themselves and undertake to market it all throughout the world which made them have the final say in deciding the price of oil and also in production levels.

  1. "The Controversy over the War with Iraq".

    They also were harassed by the public and president for not communicating well with each other and working together. So Bush declared he would start a new department of homeland security and selected former Pennsylvania Governor Tom Ridge to be ahead of the department.

  2. US President George Bush labelled Iran and Iraq as part of an "axis of ...

    Evidently the Kazakhstan Government decided against seeling the uranium to Iran. In the end the uranium was turned over to the US and spirited away in a clandestine operation.25 Chemical Weapons On the 3rd of November 1997, Iran ratified the Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC).

  1. The Prelude to the 1975 War and the Cairo Agreement.

    The most significant feature of the February 1984 was that for the first time Shi'i organizations, with Amal in the lead and the Iranian-backed Islamists of Hizballah ("Party of God") not far behind, imposed themselves on Lebanese politics. West Beirut came under local militia control, principally Nabih Berri's Amal and Junblatt's PSP, with the Sunnis and Palestinians subordinatede.

  2. Discuss the tension and arguments over the justification of the Iraq war.

    Ali by many tabloids, both Chirac and Mr.Ali have gone onto national and international television claiming that a war is unjustified and that America and Britain are just taking out past frustrations (September 11th being given as a reason) these two very public figures taking their arguments to the media has just made Tony Blair and George W.

  1. Citizenship - compare " Show you don't want war" and "Iraq evidence is overwhelming".

    Another reason it is so much in the public eye is because world leaders are seemingly engaging in a war of words with each other, battle lines that have so far been drawn pit George W. Bush and Tony Blair against Jacques Chirac and the Iraqi public minister, nicknamed Chemical

  2. Why did Iraq invade Kuwait?

    1 barge operations platform New Zealand 50 medical soldiers and 2-C130's Niger 500 troops Oman 25,500 troops, 63 airplanes, 4 Exocet-armed ships Poland 1 hospital ship Qatar A squadron of Mirage F-1E fighters Romania 180 chemical warfare experts Saudi Arabia 118,000 troops, 550 tanks, 180 airplanes South Korea 5 C-130

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work