• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

This will be a speech in favour of the War on Iraq.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Nathan Derry Coursework Original Writing This will be a speech in favour of the War on Iraq. Its purpose is for the East Norfolk Sixth Form Debating society, and will presented to them, when a topic of this nature arises. " Ladies and Gentlemen, I stand here in front of you today, to present the arguments, of why the war on Iraq is a just one. There are those among us who'd never support an American sponsored war; Instead, they'd prefer to criticise and pontificate form afar, enjoying the freedoms born of past wars. The rationale of these people for military inaction varies widely. For some, they harbour a deep anti-Bush, anti-Republican bias, and distrust anything directly from the White House. Others belong in the moral-relativism camp and view Saddam Hussein's regime, no different to that of any other Government, United States included. ...read more.

Middle

Saddam maintains his power through the brunt use of force, rather than that of benevolence or good will. Secondly, the idea of Saddam acquiring nuclear weapons may change the dynamics in the Middle East. Saddam ahs already demonstrated a willingness to use weapons of mass destruction when he sees it will suit his purpose- a nuclear bomb would just be another tool in his arsenal. I continue, the rebuilding of Iraq, in mine, and many others' opinions, is more than possible. Despite all the protests in recent times over 'nation-building', the fact is, and historical evidence shows, that it works. In fact, Japan, Italy, Germany and many more European countries, owe their current shape to American nation-building. Japan provides the best example. Back in the 1930's, Japan was a strong military force, feared by many, which invaded its' neighbours, committed widespread human rights violations, and ruined the lives and livelihoods of many innocent people. ...read more.

Conclusion

Why? Because morality often serves as an impediment to negotiation, earning scoffs and derisions from international diplomats. However, there is a legitimate issue of morality in this current conflict. I emphasise, Saddam is an evil butcher who has terrorised his people for far too long, and unfortunately, these people are simply incapable of defending themselves, without our assistance. We have it within out power to provide the people of Iraq with freedom, liberty and protection from a brutal government that orders torture, murder and rape against opponents. We can give these people a better tomorrow, more than they ever hoped possible. In conclusion, I say to you that instead of thinking of the deaths and harm that may arise as a result of the war every time it is mentioned, think and look on the positive side; Not only will the evil dictator, Saddam, be removed from his wrongful position, but people can live an easier life without the fear of death just around the corner. Thank you for listening" Nathan Derry ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. The role of Saddam Hussain in serving the aims of America in the Middle ...

    Therefore America dominated three of the most important countries in the Gulf region - Saudi Arabia, Iraq and Iran. The only countries left for her to dominate were the other Gulf States ruled by Emirs and Sheikhs - their position was entrenched due to their affiliation to certain tribes.

  2. Discuss the tension and arguments over the justification of the Iraq war.

    Bush do the same, only this time pinning the blame firmly on Iraq. Not a news bulletin passes without one of these figures making a derogatory comment about each other or trying to justify their reasoning. Rather ironically the largest figure of hate and the man at the centre of

  1. Why did Iraq invade Kuwait?

    The USS Louisville became the first sub to launch a cruise missile in combat. In order to stop Iraq dumping oil in the gulf, the allies bombed Iraqi-held oil facilities in Kuwait. On 29 January the largest ground battle of the war so far took place with up to 800 U.S.

  2. The United Nations and the Iraq Conflict

    especially those which either hold political, social or religious viewpoints in opposition of the super powers or have no economic or conventional connection with the super power will be involved in an abundance of conflicts that are very rarely resolved quickly.22 Due to these historic alliances and the United States'

  1. "The Controversy over the War with Iraq".

    Saddam has a long history with terrorism and after the United States found out that one of the hijackers met with Iraq intelligence before 9/11, Saddam became more responsible of the attacks. Most of presidents Bush's time in the year of 2002 was spent trying to revenge the attacks and how to get Saddam (Kraft, 2003).

  2. US President George Bush labelled Iran and Iraq as part of an "axis of ...

    China pledged in October of 1997 to cease cooperation on building a uranium conversion facility and to 'forego any new nuclear cooperation with Iran'20. In June, 1995, US Vice President Al Gore, visited Russia and received an assurance that Russia would 'cease all deliveries of conventional arms to Iran by

  1. Citizenship - compare " Show you don't want war" and "Iraq evidence is overwhelming".

    Another reason it is so much in the public eye is because world leaders are seemingly engaging in a war of words with each other, battle lines that have so far been drawn pit George W. Bush and Tony Blair against Jacques Chirac and the Iraqi public minister, nicknamed Chemical

  2. The case against war on Iraq.

    Hans Blix recommended more time for more thorough inspections. The inspectors only arrived in December 2002 and did not receive their first helicopter until late January 2003. They are still a long way from completing inspections. Out of 700 listed sites, they have so far inspected 350 and been given immediate and full access to these sites.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work