• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To discuss reasons for and against waging War on Iraq, reaching a conclusion based on personal opinion, and information gathered from various sources, both for and against.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Aim To discuss reasons for and against waging War on Iraq, reaching a conclusion based on personal opinion, and information gathered from various sources, both for and against. The Sources Source 1 www.non-violence.org This is a web site opposed to the war on Iraq. Although there is little factual evidence which reduces the integrity, there are vague truths such as "Iraq's missiles are not very good at delivery chemicals". This is a biased source as it supports a more liberal stance, so they are less likely to point out anything that could condemn Iraq or Saddam Hussein. It is written to make Iraq look weak, and thus make the US look like bullies. They use quotes such as "Iraq's military is a shambles", and "Shadow or former self" to do this. Source 2 www.seattlepl.nwsource.com This source, from a Seattle based broadsheet newspaper, "The Seattle Post Intelligencer" is based much more on statistics, such as figures for cost, numbers of troops and religious spread in Iraq. This source also takes into consideration, Saddam's age and who would take over if he were killed or overthrown. The source isn't likely to be biased, as it is from an established company, thus facts will have been considered before they took this stance. The editor's political persuasion does need to be considered though, as the employee wants to please there boss, so the writer may have written to a stance to please the editor, even if he, after research, have come to a different opinion. ...read more.

Middle

claims source 5. This sort of money would be able to vastly improve education and quality of life in Iraq, thus preparing it for when the oil eventually runs dry. Saddam also provided security officials with, "extra food rations, Mercedes automobiles and monthly stipends in the thousands of dollars." This is another sign of Saddam's greed and how money in Iraq is being horded by the powerful to gain much more power, not only in Iraq but around the world with there nuclear reputation. All this is at the deposal of the Iraq peoples human rights and lifestyles, which have been crushed. The gulf war was the battle fought between America and its allies against Iraq after they invade Kuwait and Hussein appointed himself president of Kuwait. As he built up power in the country for an invasion of Saudi Arabia when the Saudi's called for US assistance, as if Saddam took control he would control 40% of all oil supplies and could have power over all. "Over 1 million people died in them" claims source 4 about the war. Some could argue that the 1 million deaths is an argument against war, but if you consider the numbers that would have died if Iraq was left to its own devices to conquer the middle east and potentially attack the west with its nuclear program, the numbers died in the war would have been less than without. ...read more.

Conclusion

In conclusion I think I will have to side with taking action again the regime and instigating war on Iraq. Granted, the information against the war is compelling and I find the bush doctrine fascinating, but the facts presented in the US portfolio are too strong no ignore. The state of Iraq at the present time is terrible, the condition the country is in can be describes as poor at best. I have no doubt that Iraq has weapons of mass destruction, and none of the sources try to deny this, and we need to look to the future. In 35 years the oil in Iraq will be gone, then there is a country with no industry and economy, an uneducated population and all services in a disastrous state. But the country will, no doubt have an extremist leader and a stockpile of weapons if no action is taken. What will that leader do? Start a legitimate organised government that decides what's best for the countries future, or send troops into neighbouring countries in an attempt to obtain more resources and money as they have done in the past? Mr. Blair and The US governments arguments are respectable, considered and represented well, even if there motives are unclear. All the sources against the war overlook how the Iraqi people are being treated, and it is the people that need to be saved from Saddam, not the military strong arms like the US and the UK. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. This graduation paper is about U.S. - Soviet relations in Cold War period. Our ...

    Speaking at the Cominform meeting in August, Andre Zhdanov issued the Soviet Union's rebuttal to the Truman Doctrine. The United States, he charged, was organizing the countries of the Near East, Western Europe, and South America into an alliance committed to the destruction of communism.

  2. The role of Saddam Hussain in serving the aims of America in the Middle ...

    The control of these huge operations used to be and still is undertaken by the Seven Sisters' board of directors, based in one of Dallas's skyscrapers. In order to put an end to this American dominance over oil and its marketing, Britain laid down a long-term plan and started implementing in the late fifties.

  1. The Prelude to the 1975 War and the Cairo Agreement.

    after fierce fighting, an event known in the Palestinian lexicon as "Black September." Therefore, the PLO leadership and guerrillas moved their main base of operations from Jordan to Lebanon, where the Cairo Agreement endorsed their presence. The influx of several hundred thousand Palestinians including many tens of thousands of guerrillas

  2. Discuss the tension and arguments over the justification of the Iraq war.

    In article 2 it quotes " Iraqi's tyrant has weapons of mass destruction and has links with Bin Laden and Al-Quaida" this is another reason why the war started was because Saddam is branded a tyrant and a man with weapons of mass destruction and America wants to get rid of him and the weapons.

  1. Why did Iraq invade Kuwait?

    The Gulf region was within US Central Command's (CENTCOM) area of responsibility. Eventually, 30 nations joined the military coalition against Iraq, with a further 18 countries supplying economic or other types of assistance. Carriers in the Gulf of Oman and the Red Sea responded, US Air Force interceptors deployed from

  2. I have chosen to debate whether the decision to attack Iraq was indeed a ...

    The bearer of this good news was none other than Rumsfeld, who travelled to Baghdad and met with Hussein in December 1983 as a special representative of President Reagan. The Department of Defence provided Iraq with secret satellite data on Iranian military positions.

  1. Vietnam - reasons the US lost the war.

    Eisenhower after Vietnam was split in half. The United States thought that Ngo Dinh Diem would have an effect on Vietnamese people and would eventually gain support. He was in controlled of the South where his views were completely different from Ho Chi Minh. There was no support from the Vietnamese in the south who were supposed to look at Diem as their God.

  2. Hiroshima Coursework This piece of coursework will concentrate on three questions, all source based.

    Reading this source, the reader becomes aware that even Americans working directly for the President and people who should support every act the US government did. However, this source suggests that Japan would have surrendered regardless of the nuclear bomb.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work