• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To What Extent Was Gorbachev Responsible For the Collapse of the Soviet Empire?

Extracts from this document...


TO WHAT EXTENT WAS GORBACHEV RESPONSIBLE FOR THE COLLAPSE OF THE SOVIET EMPIRE? Gorbachev was responsible for the collapse of the soviet empire to a point. In 1985 when he came to power, he realised that the soviet economy was devastated and facing many problems with communism making the situation much worse. Gorbachev realised that reforms were needed to stabilise the economy. He was responsible because he did not do anything to stop solidarity which allowed people to have more freedom. This weakened the hard line adopted by Jaruzelski much more difficult to maintain. He encouraged solidarity by introducing his reforms that of Perestroika-restructuring the soviet economy - and Glasnost - where public opinion about government policy was allowed. ...read more.


However Gorbachev was not responsible because even though he encouraged solidarity he did not start it. It was because of the oppression the people received from communism that they rebelled. The leaders were very hard lined which created discontent in the people. Gorbachev did not do anything to prevent Germany. He was not responsible for the Hungarian uprising in 1956 and Czechoslovakia in 1968 which showed that the communist government was band to collapse prior to the discontent and revolt between the communist people. In fact, Gorbachev was not responsible as even though we lowered the arms expenditure, more money would be saved by the government, for example to improve industry and its products and besides there were already low morale and attitudes to work Gorbachev was not responsible for causing the Berlin Wall to collapse; again it was due to the discontent people shared from Stalin's and Brezhnev's actions. ...read more.


Furthermore, there were many new issues that were coming up in USSR like there were many new groups like the Islamic Fundamentalism which Gorbachev had to think about. Moreover the Soviet empire was changing in political circumstances made buffer zone unnecessary as now no more land attacks would take place but instead use missiles e.g. ICBM's Overall I do think that Gorbachev was responsible for the collapse of the Soviet empire, because if it was not for him, there would be few demonstrations and people would not have freedom of speech and expression and would still have been deprived of freedom to criticise the Government. It was due to the introduction of his reforms which cause the Soviet Union to collapse but on the other hand there were other reasons to the collapse of the Soviet Union. HUSSEIN KAPASI ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. To what extent was Hitler solely responsible for the Holocaust

    Although Kershaw has limited his study to Bavaria -the largely catholic area and the cradle of Nazism- in his findings Kershaw concludes that the Bavarians knew very little about the final solution and the information about extermination camps non-existent. Although there were rumours about shootings and other heinous acts inflicted

  2. Examine the claim that Hoover was responsible for the dramatic collapse of the economy ...

    Although Hoover attempted to improve it, his efforts were not successful. One of his biggest mistakes was freezing war debts from European countries. He proposed a one year moratorium of the payments, which was signed by 15 nations by July 1931.

  1. How does Ballard use the different nationalities within 'Empire of the Sun' to convey ...

    This description is symbolic for the majority of the Chinese race. Their bodies drift away in the wooden coffins, yet are always brought back by the tide, it is almost as if for the Chinese, there is no escape from this land that submises them so greatly.


    Peasants from the countryside often found themselves operating quite sophisticated machinery with little or no tuition, and few instructions. Of course if the machine broke down they were accused of sabotage! How successful were the Five Year Plans? * There is no doubt, despite the exaggerated figures, that the Five Year Plans completely transformed the Soviet Union.

  1. How important were developments in Eastern Europe to the collapse of the Soviet Union?

    In November 1988, the Estonian Parliament had declared Independence after the Popular Front for Perestroika was set up in April that year. Autonomist movements had sprung in Moldavia January 1989, along with huge demonstrations of green nationalism early 1988 in Latvia.

  2. The Collapse of Communism in the USSR and Eastern Europe

    As recently upgraded spy systems relayed, irregularly it is true, updates on these problems to the West, they were picked up by hawkists within America and taken into careful consideration by those in charge of developing foreign policy. D�tente had, once again, lost its luster in the eyes of many

  1. Why did the Soviet Union maintain a presence in Eastern Europe? And why did ...

    According to Dawisha, "Having opened the floodgates for 'creative Marxism', Stalin and his influential minister of culture, Andrei Zhdanov, enunciated the famous 'two-camp theory', which both reflected and strengthened the post-war division of the world into two great power blocs" (Dawisha, K, 1988, pg.

  2. Why did tsarism collapse?

    The Prime Minster, Stolypin , attempted reform seeing the necessity to strengthen Russia following Japan which meant distribution of land to the peasants which he thought would contribute to rebuilding and modernising the economy, the successful could make their living off the land while the rest would populate the factories.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work