• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Views on why we should or should not go to war with Iraq.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

James = red Paul = blue Hello i'm James and i'm going to provide you with my points of view why Britain and America shouldn't go to war with Iraq Hello I'm Paul and I'm going to provide you with my points of view on why we should go to war with Iraq. I believe that there are many reasons why George W. bush and Tony Blair shouldn't declare war on Iraq. One of the main reasons is that it's illegal for Bush and Blair to go to war with Iraq. The War Powers Resolution only authorizes the president to use force against those involved in the September 11 attacks. It clearly states, "The president is authorized to use all necessary and appropriate force against those nations, organizations or persons he determines planned, authorized, committed or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on Sept. 11, 2001, or harboured such organizations or persons." So far, no evidence has been presented implicating Iraq in the 9-11 attacks therefore if Bush declares war then it would be a war crime because it's broken the law. Now let me start with the main reasons why I think the United States is going to have to go to war, why it is necessary and why it would be in some senses positive to go to war. ...read more.

Middle

as many as one million Iraqis, many of them in the most horrific circumstances imaginable- as a result of chemical warfare of the most inhumane forms of torture that the world has seen over the last one hundred years. The torture is so bad that it can only be compared to the World War 2 dictatorship of Stalin and Hitler Everything your saying is true, so why hasn't anything tried to be done before apart from the gulf war, which was over 10 years ago. I believe that George Bush is trying to finish off what his father couldn't do, finish off Saddam Hussein. I also believe that bush only wants to go to war to establish control over the production and distribution of its oil and gas resources. Iraq happens to be the 2nd largest source of oil in the world. Furthermore, control of Iraq, either directly or indirectly through a U.S. imposed puppet regime would provide the U.S with stable access to it's northern and southern oil fields; and also provides the U.S. oil companies with favourable access to oil production sharing agreements Yes but Saddam hasn't for filled all the criteria that the united nations set for him, therefore indisputably shouldn't we make him pay, before he goes completely mad and tries to overtake neighbouring countries. ...read more.

Conclusion

Civilians always die in wars. It may be in the thousands. But, Hussein is already killing thousands of them and will continue to do so. At least when the US attacks Iraq, they will not be deliberately targeting and attacking civilians. Unlike Saddam who has deliberately targeted civilians on a huge scale and who has used chemical weapons on civilians, all the civilian deaths that will occur as a result of US attacks will be accidents. At least there is a chance that the killing of civilians will stop when the US wins. War is not the only answer, I believe if Tony Blair and George Bush really cared about there people and all the Iraqis then surely they can co-operate with the united nations to find another way to deal with Saddam Hussein instead of diving in at the deep end willing to kill thousands and ruin life's Finally I believe................ Finally I believe that there is always another way out, war is never the answer and surely if tony blair is the people's priinister then surely he can hear what the 69 million plus people are telling him and not what his little war monger friend George Bush is whispering into his ear. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. The United Nations and the Iraq Conflict

    Certain states, which appear to pose as a threat will often be more centered in the issues, as apposed to more neutral states which little can be gained from controlling. "Despite increased interconnectedness among states as a general rule, some states still do not matter very much."21 While some states,

  2. The Prelude to the 1975 War and the Cairo Agreement.

    Only Washington and Damascus could have had this interest. By this point the LF was probably already plotting a surprise military strike to paralyse army communications to coincide with a "security plan" proposed for West Beirut in early February.

  1. History of the United States

    Progressivism at Home Meanwhile, the Progressive Era was also underway in domestic politics. City governments were transformed, becoming relatively honest and efficient; social workers labored to improve slum housing, health, and education; and in many states reform movements democratized, purified, and humanized government.

  2. Should We Go To War With Iraq? - Discursive Essay

    In recent years many rural people have moved to the larger urban centers, straining the government's ability to provide social services and causing unemployment, particularly among men 20 to 25 years old. The Kurds, who inhabit the area north and northwest of Mosul, are followers of Islam and share a similar cultural heritage with the Arab population of Iraq.

  1. Why did Iraq invade Kuwait?

    warships in the gulf. USS Tripoli and USS Princeton were damaged but still operational. On 19 February Tariq Ariz returned to Baghdad with the Soviet peace proposal but the Americans said it fell well short of what was needed to end the war.

  2. While surfing the channels on TV you might hear a lot of news about ...

    In my opinion this step was a terrible mistake. Just think of the request of Palestinians! They also want to have their own state, therefore they are always asking for parts from Israel, which they think to be their land. Isn't there any truth in their requests? Unfortunately there is.

  1. The role of Saddam Hussain in serving the aims of America in the Middle ...

    As a direct response, the industrial countries started to raise the prices of manufactured goods under the pretext that the cost of production had also increased due to the increase in oil prices, despite the fact that the rise in the prices of manufactured goods was not commensurate with the

  2. "The Controversy over the War with Iraq".

    years later after the Gulf War we would have the same problem with the same man. At the conclusion of the Gulf War, Saddam was handcuffed and forced to cease fire. Then we striped him of his armored forces, and with the support of the United Nations we put in laws to have weapon inspections throughout Iraq.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work