• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Views on why we should or should not go to war with Iraq.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

James = red Paul = blue Hello i'm James and i'm going to provide you with my points of view why Britain and America shouldn't go to war with Iraq Hello I'm Paul and I'm going to provide you with my points of view on why we should go to war with Iraq. I believe that there are many reasons why George W. bush and Tony Blair shouldn't declare war on Iraq. One of the main reasons is that it's illegal for Bush and Blair to go to war with Iraq. The War Powers Resolution only authorizes the president to use force against those involved in the September 11 attacks. It clearly states, "The president is authorized to use all necessary and appropriate force against those nations, organizations or persons he determines planned, authorized, committed or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on Sept. 11, 2001, or harboured such organizations or persons." So far, no evidence has been presented implicating Iraq in the 9-11 attacks therefore if Bush declares war then it would be a war crime because it's broken the law. Now let me start with the main reasons why I think the United States is going to have to go to war, why it is necessary and why it would be in some senses positive to go to war. ...read more.

Middle

as many as one million Iraqis, many of them in the most horrific circumstances imaginable- as a result of chemical warfare of the most inhumane forms of torture that the world has seen over the last one hundred years. The torture is so bad that it can only be compared to the World War 2 dictatorship of Stalin and Hitler Everything your saying is true, so why hasn't anything tried to be done before apart from the gulf war, which was over 10 years ago. I believe that George Bush is trying to finish off what his father couldn't do, finish off Saddam Hussein. I also believe that bush only wants to go to war to establish control over the production and distribution of its oil and gas resources. Iraq happens to be the 2nd largest source of oil in the world. Furthermore, control of Iraq, either directly or indirectly through a U.S. imposed puppet regime would provide the U.S with stable access to it's northern and southern oil fields; and also provides the U.S. oil companies with favourable access to oil production sharing agreements Yes but Saddam hasn't for filled all the criteria that the united nations set for him, therefore indisputably shouldn't we make him pay, before he goes completely mad and tries to overtake neighbouring countries. ...read more.

Conclusion

Civilians always die in wars. It may be in the thousands. But, Hussein is already killing thousands of them and will continue to do so. At least when the US attacks Iraq, they will not be deliberately targeting and attacking civilians. Unlike Saddam who has deliberately targeted civilians on a huge scale and who has used chemical weapons on civilians, all the civilian deaths that will occur as a result of US attacks will be accidents. At least there is a chance that the killing of civilians will stop when the US wins. War is not the only answer, I believe if Tony Blair and George Bush really cared about there people and all the Iraqis then surely they can co-operate with the united nations to find another way to deal with Saddam Hussein instead of diving in at the deep end willing to kill thousands and ruin life's Finally I believe................ Finally I believe that there is always another way out, war is never the answer and surely if tony blair is the people's priinister then surely he can hear what the 69 million plus people are telling him and not what his little war monger friend George Bush is whispering into his ear. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. While surfing the channels on TV you might hear a lot of news about ...

    She said that things had changed since then in the US. People became more suspicious, more cautious, and more nationalist. Americans are even prouder of being Americans (it's so funny to write this idea write down after reading the article about an experiment by the National Geographic Society that most American kids couldn't find NY on the map).

  2. The United Nations and the Iraq Conflict

    With the end of World War II, in addition to the creation of the UN, emerged two alliances, which dictated the force behind two 'teams' in the UN. The North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), included the members of the ally countries, and the countries in support of the Triple Entente erected the Warsaw Pact.

  1. History of the United States

    to pump up consumer buying power. In 1933 he had decided to take the nation off the gold standard, except in international trade. Setting the price at which the government would buy gold at $35 an ounce, he induced so massive a flow of gold into the country that its

  2. The role of Saddam Hussain in serving the aims of America in the Middle ...

    going to be neutral in this war and called upon other countries to also remain neutral and not to supply any of the two parties with weapons. The joint statement did obviously include an appeal to the two warring countries to put an end to the hostilities between them.

  1. "The Controversy over the War with Iraq".

    This was a tragic day in United States history and really enforced the need to take out the terrorist regimes around the world. The terrorist thought the attacks would weaken United States resolve and start the triumph of America. Since the attacks Bush has said several times "that they did no such thing, they only strengthened a country".

  2. US President George Bush labelled Iran and Iraq as part of an "axis of ...

    One such place is Sharif University of Technology. The university allegedly severs as a 'procurement front' and research centre for the 'bomb' programme.18 Iran relies upon foreign aid to enhance its nuclear programme. Russia and China have played key roles in helping develop Iran's nuclear programme. Iran signed an eight hundred million dollar deal with the USSR, which

  1. George Walker Bush.

    However, many environmentalists hold that it will produce such small amounts of petroleum as to be effectively useless and will certainly do far greater harm to irreplaceable and finite resources of the planet than good. Redesign of the military with emphasis on supermodern hardware, flexible tactics, speed, less international deployment, fewer troops.

  2. The Prelude to the 1975 War and the Cairo Agreement.

    The Tiger barracks at Amchit were captured after holding out for most of the day. The 'Day of Long Knives' as it became to be called claimed around 200 lives around half of which were civilians who had been caught during indiscriminate shooting.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work