• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Views on why we should or should not go to war with Iraq.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

James = red Paul = blue Hello i'm James and i'm going to provide you with my points of view why Britain and America shouldn't go to war with Iraq Hello I'm Paul and I'm going to provide you with my points of view on why we should go to war with Iraq. I believe that there are many reasons why George W. bush and Tony Blair shouldn't declare war on Iraq. One of the main reasons is that it's illegal for Bush and Blair to go to war with Iraq. The War Powers Resolution only authorizes the president to use force against those involved in the September 11 attacks. It clearly states, "The president is authorized to use all necessary and appropriate force against those nations, organizations or persons he determines planned, authorized, committed or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on Sept. 11, 2001, or harboured such organizations or persons." So far, no evidence has been presented implicating Iraq in the 9-11 attacks therefore if Bush declares war then it would be a war crime because it's broken the law. Now let me start with the main reasons why I think the United States is going to have to go to war, why it is necessary and why it would be in some senses positive to go to war. ...read more.

Middle

as many as one million Iraqis, many of them in the most horrific circumstances imaginable- as a result of chemical warfare of the most inhumane forms of torture that the world has seen over the last one hundred years. The torture is so bad that it can only be compared to the World War 2 dictatorship of Stalin and Hitler Everything your saying is true, so why hasn't anything tried to be done before apart from the gulf war, which was over 10 years ago. I believe that George Bush is trying to finish off what his father couldn't do, finish off Saddam Hussein. I also believe that bush only wants to go to war to establish control over the production and distribution of its oil and gas resources. Iraq happens to be the 2nd largest source of oil in the world. Furthermore, control of Iraq, either directly or indirectly through a U.S. imposed puppet regime would provide the U.S with stable access to it's northern and southern oil fields; and also provides the U.S. oil companies with favourable access to oil production sharing agreements Yes but Saddam hasn't for filled all the criteria that the united nations set for him, therefore indisputably shouldn't we make him pay, before he goes completely mad and tries to overtake neighbouring countries. ...read more.

Conclusion

Civilians always die in wars. It may be in the thousands. But, Hussein is already killing thousands of them and will continue to do so. At least when the US attacks Iraq, they will not be deliberately targeting and attacking civilians. Unlike Saddam who has deliberately targeted civilians on a huge scale and who has used chemical weapons on civilians, all the civilian deaths that will occur as a result of US attacks will be accidents. At least there is a chance that the killing of civilians will stop when the US wins. War is not the only answer, I believe if Tony Blair and George Bush really cared about there people and all the Iraqis then surely they can co-operate with the united nations to find another way to deal with Saddam Hussein instead of diving in at the deep end willing to kill thousands and ruin life's Finally I believe................ Finally I believe that there is always another way out, war is never the answer and surely if tony blair is the people's priinister then surely he can hear what the 69 million plus people are telling him and not what his little war monger friend George Bush is whispering into his ear. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. While surfing the channels on TV you might hear a lot of news about ...

    depredations all over the region, Caribbean and Central America, sometimes beyond, conquered Hawaii and the Philippines, killing several 100,000 Filipinos in the process. Since the Second World War, it has extended its reach around the world in ways I don't have to describe.

  2. The United Nations and the Iraq Conflict

    With the end of World War II, in addition to the creation of the UN, emerged two alliances, which dictated the force behind two 'teams' in the UN. The North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), included the members of the ally countries, and the countries in support of the Triple Entente erected the Warsaw Pact.

  1. History of the United States

    The United States never became a member of the League of Nations. THE UNITED STATES TURNS INWARD: THE 1920S AND 1930S After its participation in the conflagration then known as the Great War, the American nation was ready to turn inward and concentrate on domestic affairs (a "return to normalcy," as 1920 presidential candidate Warren Harding called it).

  2. The role of Saddam Hussain in serving the aims of America in the Middle ...

    Therefore, these American planners came up with a very devious plan which involved starting a war between Iraq and Iran in a manner that which would make fear creep into the hearts of the Gulf rulers. Tension started to escalate between Iraq and Iran in response to Washington's designs until

  1. "The Controversy over the War with Iraq".

    This brought up major controversy over Iraq and the United States with Great Britain wanting to attack Saddam. However, nothing really occurred and Saddam was left to himself. The war in Iraq all started with the attacks on the twin towers and the pentagon, by the terrorist on September 11th, 2001.

  2. US President George Bush labelled Iran and Iraq as part of an "axis of ...

    One such place is Sharif University of Technology. The university allegedly severs as a 'procurement front' and research centre for the 'bomb' programme.18 Iran relies upon foreign aid to enhance its nuclear programme. Russia and China have played key roles in helping develop Iran's nuclear programme. Iran signed an eight hundred million dollar deal with the USSR, which

  1. George Walker Bush.

    Education policy named 'No Child Left Behind', includes mandatory national testing and some support for school vouchers. It also makes high school academic records available to military recruiters. Drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR) and other domestic fields is claimed to decrease dependence on oil imports, particularly from the Middle East.

  2. The Prelude to the 1975 War and the Cairo Agreement.

    After the operation Bashir Gemayel emerged as the dominant Maronite military leader and by the end of October 1978 the main bulk of the Tiger militia was totally absorbed into the Lebanese Forces and lost their separate command and identity.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work