• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Views on why we should or should not go to war with Iraq.

Extracts from this document...


James = red Paul = blue Hello i'm James and i'm going to provide you with my points of view why Britain and America shouldn't go to war with Iraq Hello I'm Paul and I'm going to provide you with my points of view on why we should go to war with Iraq. I believe that there are many reasons why George W. bush and Tony Blair shouldn't declare war on Iraq. One of the main reasons is that it's illegal for Bush and Blair to go to war with Iraq. The War Powers Resolution only authorizes the president to use force against those involved in the September 11 attacks. It clearly states, "The president is authorized to use all necessary and appropriate force against those nations, organizations or persons he determines planned, authorized, committed or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on Sept. 11, 2001, or harboured such organizations or persons." So far, no evidence has been presented implicating Iraq in the 9-11 attacks therefore if Bush declares war then it would be a war crime because it's broken the law. Now let me start with the main reasons why I think the United States is going to have to go to war, why it is necessary and why it would be in some senses positive to go to war. ...read more.


as many as one million Iraqis, many of them in the most horrific circumstances imaginable- as a result of chemical warfare of the most inhumane forms of torture that the world has seen over the last one hundred years. The torture is so bad that it can only be compared to the World War 2 dictatorship of Stalin and Hitler Everything your saying is true, so why hasn't anything tried to be done before apart from the gulf war, which was over 10 years ago. I believe that George Bush is trying to finish off what his father couldn't do, finish off Saddam Hussein. I also believe that bush only wants to go to war to establish control over the production and distribution of its oil and gas resources. Iraq happens to be the 2nd largest source of oil in the world. Furthermore, control of Iraq, either directly or indirectly through a U.S. imposed puppet regime would provide the U.S with stable access to it's northern and southern oil fields; and also provides the U.S. oil companies with favourable access to oil production sharing agreements Yes but Saddam hasn't for filled all the criteria that the united nations set for him, therefore indisputably shouldn't we make him pay, before he goes completely mad and tries to overtake neighbouring countries. ...read more.


Civilians always die in wars. It may be in the thousands. But, Hussein is already killing thousands of them and will continue to do so. At least when the US attacks Iraq, they will not be deliberately targeting and attacking civilians. Unlike Saddam who has deliberately targeted civilians on a huge scale and who has used chemical weapons on civilians, all the civilian deaths that will occur as a result of US attacks will be accidents. At least there is a chance that the killing of civilians will stop when the US wins. War is not the only answer, I believe if Tony Blair and George Bush really cared about there people and all the Iraqis then surely they can co-operate with the united nations to find another way to deal with Saddam Hussein instead of diving in at the deep end willing to kill thousands and ruin life's Finally I believe................ Finally I believe that there is always another way out, war is never the answer and surely if tony blair is the people's priinister then surely he can hear what the 69 million plus people are telling him and not what his little war monger friend George Bush is whispering into his ear. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. The United Nations and the Iraq Conflict

    the beginning of established societies, it has been apparent that the leaders of the world are always the richest countries with the highest levels of development and military. This allows the state to be independent of outside countries; however, will continuing to gain power through holding firm control over the smaller countries below it.

  2. History of the United States

    Zachary TAYLOR in the White House (1849-50; on his death Millard FILLMORE became president, 1850- 53). The COMPROMISE OF 1850 seemed to settle the slavery expansion issue by the principle of POPULAR SOVEREIGNTY, allowing the people who lived in the Mexican cession to decide for themselves.

  1. Should We Go To War With Iraq? - Discursive Essay

    In recent years many rural people have moved to the larger urban centers, straining the government's ability to provide social services and causing unemployment, particularly among men 20 to 25 years old. The Kurds, who inhabit the area north and northwest of Mosul, are followers of Islam and share a similar cultural heritage with the Arab population of Iraq.

  2. The role of Saddam Hussain in serving the aims of America in the Middle ...

    proportion of citizens in these states were followers of the Jaafari Math'hab. Most of these people identified with Khomeini as the leader of the only Shiite country in the region and the supporters of Khomeini carried out numerous political activities in these countries.

  1. Should We Go To War With Iraq!

    The reason that this could set of a war is because when the inspectors arrived they saw a nuclear warehouse full of weapons but when they went there again, all the weapons had " Disappeared." Now the Americans and the british are getting worried that the Iraqis are hiding it somewhere and they are gonna use them.

  2. The Prelude to the 1975 War and the Cairo Agreement.

    Haddad eventually proclaimed the enclave he controlled "Free Lebanon." The insulation provided by this buffer area permitted Israel to open up its border with Lebanon. Under this so-called "Good Fence" policy, Israel provided aid and conducted trade with Lebanese living near the border.

  1. The case against war on Iraq.

    This statement is ridiculously unsubstantiated. The idea of the Iraqi state attacking America is not so much unproven as implausible. The USA and UK have stretched this notion of a pre-emptive strike to qualify any strike that they claim will be for the benefit of world peace in the long-term.

  2. US President George Bush labelled Iran and Iraq as part of an "axis of ...

    The Iranian Government is building a uranium conversion facility at Bushehr in the South West corner of Iran. Iran argues that this facility is to be used as part of its 'Civilian Energy Programme'. However, such a facility can be used and is generally primarily used to produce fissile material

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work