• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Was Germany a meaningful concept by 1815?

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐Was Germany a meaningful concept by 1815? Before the 19th century, Germany as a state had no real meaning or political concept. It existed as only 314 different states with 23 million German speaking people residing within. These were loosely ruled by the Holy Roman Empire under the Holy Roman Empire. However, by 1815, a series of a few significant events had taken place which may have altered this forever. It included the impact Frederick the Great had, the French Revolution and the Napoleonic wars, the Enlightenment and its ideas and the war of liberation. The enlightenment was an 18th century intellectual movement which marked the end of the Middle Ages in Europe and a loss of power for the church. It opened up a path for independent thought, and scientific aspects and philosophy were drastically updated and expanded. With this new wave of ideas, came Liberalism and Nationalism. Liberalism is the belief that everyone should be free to choose how to live their life, according to laws agreed on by all. As the German states were dominated by the rich noble class, many rural dwellers and farmers took to these ideas. ...read more.


They saw that the enlightenment was not all perfect. This is as they wanted to preserve there state as they didn?t want to be in danger and had strong German leaders that prevented this from happening. It made the individual states stronger rather than weaker preventing unification. Also there was less publication of the works from the Enlightenment in Germany as there was language diversity and many couldn?t read and there was mass censorship. Some states were also happier with the situation they were in and had a conservative view in not wanting to change something that was working fine. As well as this, many states would rather steal more land then revolt. A main point in why Germany could not unite sooner was because each state had its own ruler, so therefore lead to many different types of leaders who had their own ideas and opinions. It would have been difficult to co-ordinate such a vast difference. These leaders also enforced repression and even though the question of what being German meant was brought in, no-one had a straight forward answer to it as there was a vast amount of different culture and religion. ...read more.


However, if it was a physical possibility by 1815 is a different matter. If the French revolution had not occurred, or if it was a success rather than a tyranny, then maybe the unification of Germany would have occurred sooner than it did. However if it had not, then the German states may have never bothered to try to unify. It was only under Napoleons reign that the beginnings of an actual German unity began, after he re-organised the states. The war of Liberation also had a huge impact. It allowed, for the first time, the Germans states, especially Austria and Prussia, to work together towards a common goal. It showed that the possibility of a German unity may not be as farfetched as it sound. But as long as there remained two leading states who both wanted power, the German States would never have been able to unify. The fact that there aims were both different, Austria didn?t want a unity at all, reinforces this. Nether the less, by 1815, a framework was in place, known as the German confederation, which allowed German states to co-exist with each other, rather then it the unification being just an idea being spread. Olivia Liu 13E ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Reasons for Napoleon's Success (to 1807).

    The army on the march was, thus, well spread-out and extremely mobile, easily able to move into a loose net-like formation and trap enemy forces manoeuvring in a traditional compact group. They could then be rounded up, and forced to fight at a disadvantage.

  2. To what extent was German Unification driven by primarily economic forces?

    The developments in weapons technologies enable the unification of Germany because it allows Prussia to defeat Austria and then France, which allows Prussia to dominate Germany. Economics contributes to this because without a strong economy Prussia could not have had the budget to afford new weapons which would aid the

  1. "To what extent was French defeat at the battle of Waterloo due to Napoleons ...

    They routed, and this lead to the victory. The reverse slope tactic was often employed by Wellington and Waterloo was another demonstration of it effectiveness. Wellington's mannerisms throughout the battle have also to come into the equation. Even as a general, he found time to care for his men.

  2. 'In the context of the period 1715-1815 to what extent were economic factors the ...

    It is interesting to note that Napoleon himself succeeded in stabilising France economically by founding the Bank of France in 1803, greatly simplifying the tax system, completely reforming the administrative system into departments and vastly improving communications. However, this was still not able to prevent him or authoritarianism from succumbing

  1. Hitlers Germany

    Hitler had the gift of all great politicians for grasping the possibilities of a situation more swiftly than his opponents. He saw, as no other politician did, how to play on the grievances and resentments of the German people, as later he was to play on French and British fear of war and fear of Communism.

  2. The attitude of the Austrian and Prussia government towards the Unification of Germany

    Fredrick William IV aimed to unify Germany through the princes and through the consent of Austria. There was fatal flaw to this plan, Austria would never agree to a united Germany dominated by Prussia. Without Austrian support Prussia would have to exclude Austria from the Bund and this would require

  1. Why did Prussia rather than Austria lead the unification of Germany?

    Schleswig and Holstein had historically been a pivot of national German feeling, but were controlled by the King of Denmark. In 1864 Christian IX of Denmark, determined to exert his authority at the beginning of his reign, decided to formally annex the two 'Elbe duchies', and in the process break

  2. How united was Germany in 1815?

    Prince Metternich established the German Confederation which was modelled on the Holy Roman Empire. The Confederation's declared aim was to ensure the 'external and internal security and the independence and integrity of the individual states'. In reality this meant that a system of 'mutual assistance' would be adopted when facing an internal rebellion or external aggression.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work