• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Was Germany a meaningful concept by 1815?

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐Was Germany a meaningful concept by 1815? Before the 19th century, Germany as a state had no real meaning or political concept. It existed as only 314 different states with 23 million German speaking people residing within. These were loosely ruled by the Holy Roman Empire under the Holy Roman Empire. However, by 1815, a series of a few significant events had taken place which may have altered this forever. It included the impact Frederick the Great had, the French Revolution and the Napoleonic wars, the Enlightenment and its ideas and the war of liberation. The enlightenment was an 18th century intellectual movement which marked the end of the Middle Ages in Europe and a loss of power for the church. It opened up a path for independent thought, and scientific aspects and philosophy were drastically updated and expanded. With this new wave of ideas, came Liberalism and Nationalism. Liberalism is the belief that everyone should be free to choose how to live their life, according to laws agreed on by all. As the German states were dominated by the rich noble class, many rural dwellers and farmers took to these ideas. ...read more.


They saw that the enlightenment was not all perfect. This is as they wanted to preserve there state as they didn?t want to be in danger and had strong German leaders that prevented this from happening. It made the individual states stronger rather than weaker preventing unification. Also there was less publication of the works from the Enlightenment in Germany as there was language diversity and many couldn?t read and there was mass censorship. Some states were also happier with the situation they were in and had a conservative view in not wanting to change something that was working fine. As well as this, many states would rather steal more land then revolt. A main point in why Germany could not unite sooner was because each state had its own ruler, so therefore lead to many different types of leaders who had their own ideas and opinions. It would have been difficult to co-ordinate such a vast difference. These leaders also enforced repression and even though the question of what being German meant was brought in, no-one had a straight forward answer to it as there was a vast amount of different culture and religion. ...read more.


However, if it was a physical possibility by 1815 is a different matter. If the French revolution had not occurred, or if it was a success rather than a tyranny, then maybe the unification of Germany would have occurred sooner than it did. However if it had not, then the German states may have never bothered to try to unify. It was only under Napoleons reign that the beginnings of an actual German unity began, after he re-organised the states. The war of Liberation also had a huge impact. It allowed, for the first time, the Germans states, especially Austria and Prussia, to work together towards a common goal. It showed that the possibility of a German unity may not be as farfetched as it sound. But as long as there remained two leading states who both wanted power, the German States would never have been able to unify. The fact that there aims were both different, Austria didn?t want a unity at all, reinforces this. Nether the less, by 1815, a framework was in place, known as the German confederation, which allowed German states to co-exist with each other, rather then it the unification being just an idea being spread. Olivia Liu 13E ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Reasons for Napoleon's Success (to 1807).

    if necessary be quickly changed; regiments could be transferred from one corps to another if required, and infantry or cavalry detachments could be sent out as skirmishers or moved round as protective screens to shield the movement of the rest of the troops, and leave the enemy confused and uncertain as to what was happening.

  2. To what extent do the economic factors account for the unification of Germany between ...

    Mostly likely written in this manner to counter the view that one person was largely responsible for the German unification, and maintain the Marxist theory of "all men and women contributing to produce and sustain social life incomplete equality".18 The work of the revisionist historian W.Carr claims that Bismarck was

  1. Why did Prussia rather than Austria lead the unification of Germany?

    Indeed, he had soon manoeuvred Austria into the second of his so called 'Wars of Unification'.5 The Seven Weeks War between Austria and Prussia seems both a natural and obvious progression of the events of the 1860's, and a necessary preliminary for the national unification of Germany.

  2. In the process of consolidating his position, Napoleons reforms, had by 1808, destroyed the ...

    their social status and an increase in those who were rewarded due to their own talent and skill. In this, Napoleon had upheld the revolutionary principle of meritocracy which was held in extremely high regard during the French Revolution. In addition to this, parents were given a choice; if they

  1. 'In the context of the period 1715-1815 to what extent were economic factors the ...

    From the soldiers returning to France to the ideas of Benjamin Franklin, the United States' first ambassador to France, the victory of the Americans, with the help of the French, was both a new look at Enlightenment ideology, as well as a proof that it could work.

  2. Hitlers Germany

    As suddenly as he had begun he would stop, smooth down his hair, straighten his collar and resume a more normal voice. This skillful and deliberate exploitation of his own temperament extended to other moods than anger. When he wanted to persuade or win someone over he could display great charm.

  1. To what extent was German Unification driven by primarily economic forces?

    unification of Germany because it allows Prussia to ascend to power throughout the 1850's and 60's ultimately resulting in unification. Austria is weak by 1866 because she had a poorly run economy and not enough public income to afford a larger and more modern army.

  2. "To what extent was French defeat at the battle of Waterloo due to Napoleons ...

    Gregor Dallas comments on Napoleons health saying, "he was very ill on the morning of the battle, this effected his capacity to command, and therefore his actions cannot be reliably examined"12 I find this view hard to suppose. The general consensus was that napoleon had haemorrhoids from riding, only him,

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work