• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Was Germany a meaningful concept by 1815?

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐Was Germany a meaningful concept by 1815? Before the 19th century, Germany as a state had no real meaning or political concept. It existed as only 314 different states with 23 million German speaking people residing within. These were loosely ruled by the Holy Roman Empire under the Holy Roman Empire. However, by 1815, a series of a few significant events had taken place which may have altered this forever. It included the impact Frederick the Great had, the French Revolution and the Napoleonic wars, the Enlightenment and its ideas and the war of liberation. The enlightenment was an 18th century intellectual movement which marked the end of the Middle Ages in Europe and a loss of power for the church. It opened up a path for independent thought, and scientific aspects and philosophy were drastically updated and expanded. With this new wave of ideas, came Liberalism and Nationalism. Liberalism is the belief that everyone should be free to choose how to live their life, according to laws agreed on by all. As the German states were dominated by the rich noble class, many rural dwellers and farmers took to these ideas. ...read more.


They saw that the enlightenment was not all perfect. This is as they wanted to preserve there state as they didn?t want to be in danger and had strong German leaders that prevented this from happening. It made the individual states stronger rather than weaker preventing unification. Also there was less publication of the works from the Enlightenment in Germany as there was language diversity and many couldn?t read and there was mass censorship. Some states were also happier with the situation they were in and had a conservative view in not wanting to change something that was working fine. As well as this, many states would rather steal more land then revolt. A main point in why Germany could not unite sooner was because each state had its own ruler, so therefore lead to many different types of leaders who had their own ideas and opinions. It would have been difficult to co-ordinate such a vast difference. These leaders also enforced repression and even though the question of what being German meant was brought in, no-one had a straight forward answer to it as there was a vast amount of different culture and religion. ...read more.


However, if it was a physical possibility by 1815 is a different matter. If the French revolution had not occurred, or if it was a success rather than a tyranny, then maybe the unification of Germany would have occurred sooner than it did. However if it had not, then the German states may have never bothered to try to unify. It was only under Napoleons reign that the beginnings of an actual German unity began, after he re-organised the states. The war of Liberation also had a huge impact. It allowed, for the first time, the Germans states, especially Austria and Prussia, to work together towards a common goal. It showed that the possibility of a German unity may not be as farfetched as it sound. But as long as there remained two leading states who both wanted power, the German States would never have been able to unify. The fact that there aims were both different, Austria didn?t want a unity at all, reinforces this. Nether the less, by 1815, a framework was in place, known as the German confederation, which allowed German states to co-exist with each other, rather then it the unification being just an idea being spread. Olivia Liu 13E ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. 'In the context of the period 1715-1815 to what extent were economic factors the ...

    previous meeting in 1614, but this turned out to be a great disappointment, with the nobility determined to block all their proposals. The effects of this can be seen with the formation of the National Assembly and the 'Tennis Court Oath' of 1789.

  2. Why did Prussia rather than Austria lead the unification of Germany?

    The imperial title was assumed by the King of Prussia at a lavish ceremony in 1871 at the Palace of Versailles.7 The 'Wars of Unification' serve to show in very practical and stark terms how Prussia was able to rise above Austria in the battle for German hegemony.

  1. To what extent was German Unification driven by primarily economic forces?

    Austria did not have new weapons, she only had flintlock muskets and therefore on the field at Sadowa she could not hope to defeat the Prussians with sub-standard weapons. Austria could not afford new weapons because of a failing economy and the fact that Austria was almost a bankrupt state;

  2. In the process of consolidating his position, Napoleons reforms, had by 1808, destroyed the ...

    an authoritarian dictatorship, which Napoleon went on to perpetuate"; he claims that the Revolution was corrupted anyway, and by carrying on the dictatorship-like rule, Napoleon was merely upholding whatever corrupt activity that the Revolution had instigated. Similarly, this is supported by Albert Vandal who claims that "Bonaparte could not suppress

  1. Hitlers Germany

    his eyes would be filled with tears and pleading, the next blazing with fury, or glazed with the faraway look of the visionary. Hitler, in fact, was a consummate actor, with the actor's and orator's facility for absorbing himself in a role and convincing himself of the truth of what he was saying at the time he said it.

  2. How significant were the obstacles to German Nationalism between 1815 and 1919?

    Any interest in political change was repressed by heavy press censorship and the secret police. Metternich was also instrumental in the introduction of the extremely repressive Carlsbad Decrees in September 1819 after bypassing the Confederation Diet and persuading Frederick William to abandon the idea of a representative constitution.

  1. Reasons for Napoleon's Success (to 1807).

    * The men fighting in the new French armies were not their as mercenaries, nor as men impressed against their will, but as citizens honourably defending their Revolution against its threatened destruction by outside forces. Instead of avoiding battle they actively sought it.

  2. To what extent do the economic factors account for the unification of Germany between ...

    striking embodiment of the idea of the modern world and the instrument of national integration"4. After the new wave of expansion in the 1850's the historian Johann Gustav Droysen wrote in an essay 'On the Present situation' about how the railways encourage unification, "Transport and the railway and education are

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work