• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Was the cold war conflict precipitated by an expansionist soviet union or were U.S efforts to create a post-war world that reflected its own interests equally responsible?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Was the cold war conflict precipitated by an expansionist soviet union or were U.S efforts to create a post-war world that reflected its own interests equally responsible? The cold war throws up a challenging problem, was there ever a unified communist threat facing the United States, or were American decision makers guilty of misperceiving apparent soviet bloc 'defensiveness' and 'caution' as expansionist threats? Similarly did American leaders, upon realizing the relative harmlessness of soviet foreign policy intentions, seek to create an ideological chasm for their own domestic reasons? The answer to this problem is as complex as the question, as this essay progresses different viewpoints will be discussed, by the end of the essay an answer should become apparent. However there does not seem to be a definitive answer, and like many major conflicts it is often the opinion of the historian that draws an answer rather than the amount of evidence available at a point in time. With the demise of the USSR there has been an incursion of new evidence that has opened the way for new theories to be explored; varying schools of thought have progressed with time, concentrating on the division of blame. The wartime alliance that had kept America and Russia together was by early 1945 all but over. The American government made the mistake of thinking that the alliance was a signal for permanent friendship.1 Yet even before the end of the war the victors were striving to seek the best possible post war position. ...read more.

Middle

In sum the traditional view argues that the buffer zone as advocated by Stalin was in fact a cover for a communist revolution as promised by the comitern nearly thirty years ago. Douglas J Macdonald, in his work 'communist bloc expansion in the early cold war' states that "soviet bloc actions in Asia strongly suggest that had robust containment policies not been followed in Europe and the Middle East, the soviets would have tried to expand their influence into those areas also."12 Russian ideology believed that the Anglo - American alliance was the reason for the cold war, "soviet leaders were prone to view Anglo - American structures as fundamentally hostile toward Russia".13 Which leads onto the next school of thought. Beginning in the mid 1960's, largely in reaction to the Vietnam War, a revisionist school evolved amongst historians who proposed that the United States was primarily to blame for the cold war. With the belief that the American policy makers were "driven by an unreasonable hostility to communism, largely generated by domestic, political and economic needs."14 Work by Daniel Yergen (shattered peace) aims to dispel the myth of soviet expansion and instead attempts to turn the attention onto the failures of the American government. Yergen argues, "the war, which promised to bequeath a great power vacuum in Europe and at the same time erased all doubts about Russia's power and capabilities, made inevitable the emergence of the soviet union as ...read more.

Conclusion

The progression of history has thrown up more theories that try to explain the cold war; the realist theory, is an example of this and seems to be a continuation of the post revisionist theme with very little difference. Yet the cold war, in my opinion cannot be so easily dismissed, there has to be a point in time where the apportion of blame can be handed out. Understandably this point is hard to find. Gaddis blames the United States for the cold war; "they had vast military and economic superiority over the soviet union."23 And therefore should have known better? If the United States had such a large advantage over their supposed allies, then it can be argued that the Soviet Union saw this, and become so obsessed with achieving the same level that they inadvertently started a cold war? The revisionist view fails to change the perceived image because it suffers from a lack of true evidence proving otherwise. It is often the first explanation that holds the most truth; this is why the point in history that can be recognized as being the cause of the cold war is the Bolshevik revolution of 1917. Whether or not the Bolshevik government knew this is debateable, however blessed with knowledge or not, the over throw of the Tsar would split the world. It was only the intervention of the Second World War that prolonged the beginning of the cold war. So to end it was an expansionist soviet union that plunged the world into a cold war. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    To what extent is the oil crisis of 1973 a turning point in postwar ...

    5 star(s)

    Because of the mounting cost of fuel and other imports, many non-oil producing third world countries had to double or triple their borrowing just to keep their economies going at pre-1970 levels. Such a situation is further exacerbated by the existing immense profits accumulated by oil companies.

  2. Superpower Relations 1945-90

    To add to this pressure, the Soviet Union had three changes of leadership in four years: Brezhnev died in 1982, Andropov resigned through illness in 1983 and Chernenko was replaced with Gorbachev in 1985. What contribution did Gorbachev make to the end of the Cold War and the beginning of a new world order?

  1. Why did tension increase in Europe between 1900 and 1914?

    * The Soviet Union feared that this would lead to a collapse of the Marxist government and intervened following the Brezhnev Doctrine. This stated that the Soviet Union was entitled to use force to protect Socialism in any country where it was under attack.

  2. How far were White weaknesses responsible for Red success in Russian Civil War?

    Even so, War Communism constituted a strength for the Bolsheviks during the Civil War that the Whites did not possess, as they made sure that the army was always supplied and did not need to rely on foreign support. As War Communism may have pushed some to doubt the socialism

  1. Who was responsible for the start of the Cold war?

    Britain had been under the guidance of Prime Minister Winston Churchill who was similarly wary of Stalin but had also become a powerful ally of the man during the World War. Now however both men had disappeared from the political forefront.

  2. How far was the USSR responsible for the outbreak of the Cold War?

    the characteristics of it with the two superpowers at opposite ends of the spectrum unsurprisingly arose over the issue of Berlin, half of which was an island of capitalism in a sea of communism. Stalin wanted a united Germany only if Soviet influence, reparations and a role for the SED

  1. The Cold War was a big rivalry that developed after World War II.

    America's next political actions further caused the Cold War to escalate. In 1947, George C. Marshall the Secretary of the state at the time gave a speech at Harvard university which reveled his plans for the an after war economy.

  2. To What extent was Germany Responsible for the outbreak of World War One?

    The Anglo-German commercial and naval rivalry and scrambles for territory all helped provoke the situation. However, colonial and trading disputes were at a minimum at the beginning of the twentieth century, better than they had been for many years. Traditional rivalries involving areas seen as strategically and militarily important were posing far more of a threat to international security.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work