• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

We live in a world of armed conflict. Explain what differing Christian attitudes to armed conflict might be.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

We live in a world of armed conflict. Explain what differing Christian attitudes to armed conflict might be. There have been more than 127 wars since 1945. In some areas of today's world, there is nothing but violence. The majority of the news on television is based on the events in Afghanistan and we will never forget the terrorist attacks on New York and Washington D.C. on the 11th of September 2001. Justice has to be sought and then peace and respect will come about. Every Christian should want peace and justice but many of these have different opinions and methods in how to achieve this. Christianity was founded on peace, emerging from it's ethic of love. Jesus said to his apostles 'Peace be with you' and we must put his words into action. This peace must guide the destiny of humanity, if we do not find peace; destruction and evil will continue to spread. Pope Paul VI said, 'Never again war! Peace must guide the destiny of the peoples and of all humanity'. The Gaudium et Spes issued by the Second Vatican Council in 1965 states, 'There will never be a truly human world for everyone until all devote themselves to peace'. The Catholic Church also teaches that because war is a matter of human freedom, it is a moral question; there are circumstances in which war can be justified, just as there are circumstances in which war cannot be justified. The decision about the justification of war is based on the basic principles of human dignity and respect for human life. ...read more.

Middle

There are four beliefs behind these crusades, the reason for the war is a holy one, God will guide and lead the armies, the crusades are on God's side: the enemies are against God, and finally, the war must be carried on to the bitter end. All the crusades think that God was on their side and the Jews were expecting a 'Holy War' when they were expecting a 'Military Messiah'. However, they did not get this fighting leader; instead they got a peaceful and loving leader who did not resort to violence. Jesus rejected violence and he taught that we should 'love our neighbour'. He said that God loves everyone, he does not hate the enemies and he taught us to love our enemies. Some Christians think that war is acceptable because it is our duty to defend the innocent and the most vulnerable. On many occasions Jesus defends the vulnerable because of their faith in God. He cured the woman with a haemorrhage, Jairus' daughter, the man with the withered hand and the epileptic boy because of their faith. Jesus also healed these because they were all innocent and Jesus felt compassion and sympathy for them. These Christians who think that it is our duty to defend the innocent believe that if the innocent and vulnerable are killed or hurt in war that justice should be sought and sometimes these Christians think that the only way that justice can come about is to go into war. They choose this as the lesser of two evils. ...read more.

Conclusion

This illustrates how much nuclear weapons the world has and how much destruction a percentage of it can cause. However, there are some Christians who think that nuclear war can be justified. There are also many arguments in favour of nuclear war. Firstly, many Christians think that the ends justify the means, peace can be achieved by nuclear war but we must make sure that this is genuine peace, not peace of a threatening nature. By using nuclear weapons in war, lives can be saved. After the Hiroshima bombing Stimson said that there would have been more lives lost if there was a long war and what they did saved lives. Nuclear war is quick and effective. Also, there have been no world wars since nuclear bombs were invented, this could be because they are scared to fire at each other in case they miss or because some peace has been found. If there is a war and you break the enemies will to fight, the war would be over and fewer lives would be lost. Taking all of these Christian views into consideration, I think that there are more valid arguments against nuclear war than there are for nuclear war. Even taking one life is serious, so, if a nuclear weapon can kill thousands and thousands of people this is horrific. War is never good; even if it is made shorter it is just as bad as you are doing an act of evil. However, the world will continue to hold nuclear weapons and the supply will continue to build up. We just have to hope that none need to be fired. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. WWII Atomic Weapons Were Justified

    The catastrophe gained its name through one horrific act the Japanese made towards the Chinese. In excess of the six weeks of the carnage portrayed by the Japanese, the Japanese troops raped over 20,000 women, in addition to the murder of about 300,000 civilians.

  2. US President George Bush labelled Iran and Iraq as part of an "axis of ...

    The British Government's Assessment of Iraq's WMD states that "majority of the publicly available information on Iraqi capabilities and intentions is dated" and that the British Government has "a range of secret intelligence about these programmes [Iraq's] and Saddam Hussein's intentions".

  1. An evaluation of the United States decision to use atomic bombs against Hiroshima and ...

    Upon viewing the aftermath of the bombing of Hiroshima, a Japanese military police captain forced American prisoners of war to look at the damage. "'Look what you've done!...One bomb! One bomb! Look there. That blue light is women burning. It is babies burning.

  2. American History.

    realized that the French were not so much their allies as they were Britain's enemies, if you know what I mean. - The gamble paid off, though, b/c with Ben Franklin leading the negotiations the treaty, which was signed on September 3, 1783 included their two must-have goals: (1)

  1. The Arab-Israeli conflict.

    This was to keep the support of the Arabs, but had lost the support of the Jews. They rose in revolt as a ship of 4000 refugees was returned to Germany known as the Exodus. However the Second World War prohibited this plan from being put into action.

  2. After the collapse of the Twin Towers of the World Trade Center, the world ...

    divided into two factions, those who belonged to the Soviet bloc, and those who belonged to the American/Western bloc. Naturally, this structure of the Cold War period has engulfed any possible separatists movements and prevented this fragmentation. Yet, after the end of the Cold War, and the break up of the Soviet Union, this previously engulfed diversity somewhat exploded.

  1. Why did hitler bomb british cities?

    They were assured of plenty of food, supplied with gas masks and bomb shelters and even taught what to do in the event of each type of raid. So, the government has many roles during war time, but key of these are protecting the people, fighting the war, and providing for the public.

  2. Dismantling Violence in Mozambique.

    The progress of their restoration was a slow one since they needed new ways of thinking and acting. "A constant exchange of information, goods, problems, and solutions continually reshaped the social landscapes and cultural realities of people's lives" (Nordstrom 96).

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work