• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Were contemporaries correct in regarding President Kennedy as the Saviour of The Western World after the Cuban Missile Crisis?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Were contemporaries correct in regarding President Kennedy as the Saviour of The Western World after the Cuban Missile Crisis? I believe that during the The Cuban missile crisis contemporaries were to a large extent correct in regarding President Kennedy a "saviour" of the western world, however it is one dimensional to regard him as the "saviour", as I believe that there were other influential people, who played a significant role in foreseeing a safe ending to the Cuban missile crisis, these individuals include Theodore Sorenson for his excellently written speeches which would boost Kennedy's reputation, and also Nikita Khrushchev for accepting to resolve the situation and accepting to work together to tackle the problems. However, It is still fair to say that Kennedy was the most influential out of all the individuals involved to sort out the worrying situation. Although he was rather impulsive at times, he handled all the pressure upon him exceptionally well and resolved the situation by handling the pressure making well judged decisions through the entirety of the crisis. I believe that Kennedy was committed to his role and took all the responsibilities with it and I see him as a superb president because of his undenying ability to keep his country calm as well as maintain a strong image and face the situation in a strong manner. ...read more.

Middle

Kennedy acting as defender of security of the USA and the western hemisphere in conjunction with congress and the constitution directed initial steps to be taken immediately, he outlined these in a speech given on 26th October 1961 on television. "First, to half this offensive build up, a strict quarantine of all military equipment under shipment to Cuba is being initiated. Second I have directed the continued and increased close surveillance and it's military build up. Third, it shall be the policy of this nation to regard any nuclear missile launched from Cuba against any nation in the western hemisphere as an attack from the Soviet Union on the United States, requiring a full retaliatory response on the Soviet Union." Kennedy's initial response to the Soviet aggression showed reasonable restraint and a genuine concern to maintain world peace. During the crisis he chose a diplomatic course of action, which was less likely to result in nuclear war. He did not authorise American armed forces to invade or bomb Cuba but chose to blockade the island of Cuba, this would keep the opportunity to negotiate with the Soviet Union open and result in a peaceful end to the crisis. The Soviet Union emerged in a weaker state following the Cuban Missile Crisis. ...read more.

Conclusion

This situation made Cuba more reliant on the Soviet Union. President Degaulle of France pulled his country out of NATO and encouraged other Western European country's to do the same, as they had not been consulted during the emergency. Kennedy was not as strong as the American propaganda implied because behind the scenes he was discussing concessions and negotiating with the Soviets. On 27th October 1963 Robert Kennedy (President Kennedy's brother) met with the Soviet ambassador Anatoly Dobrynin. The conversation, which took place, was the solution to the crisis. An ultimatum was given, that if the Russian's did not remove their missiles by the next day the American's would destroy them, but if they were removed the American missiles in Turkey would then be removed. The ambassador contacted Khrushchev and on 28th October Robert Kennedy was informed that the missiles would be withdrawn from Cuba and the crisis was over. President Kennedy's interventions in the Cuban Missile Crisis did not bring about the end of the Cold War or prevent the fear of a nuclear war ever taking place. He was not solely responsible for saving the western world from the Cuban Missile Crisis turning into a nuclear war but played a part along with others. The Cold War and super-power opposition continued until 1991 when the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (U.S.S.R.) came to an end under presidency of Mikhael Gorbachev. ?? ?? ?? ?? James Jawad ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. The Cuban Missile Crisis

    an amiable visit to the United States, the Soviet leader suddenly reverted to hostile tactics, refusing to negotiate over Berlin, and assuming a suspicious attitude about US actions in Europe. This dramatic change of approach was best displayed in the fact that, after years of silence on offensive American overflights,

  2. The Cuban Missile Crisis and the blockade

    The purpose of this essay is to address the issue of whether the blockade was the correct option chosen, and to examine the other two main possible alternatives that could have been used instead. To do this I will have four main sections in my essay.

  1. Many peoples have contributed to the development of the United States of America, a ...

    30, 1945, with the Soviet troops just a few miles from Berlin, Hitler committed suicide. Peace in Europe followed shortly. The Pacific war continued, the Japanese home islands being rendered practically defenseless by July 1945. American aerial attacks burned out city after city.

  2. History of the United States

    who flouted traditional standards, glorified self-indulgence, and scorned discipline. In the second half of the 1960s this generation gap widened as many of the young (along with large numbers of older people) questioned U.S. involvement in Vietnam. Peaceful protests led to violent confrontations, and differences concerning styles of life blurred with disagreements about the degree of allegiance that individuals owed to the American system.

  1. why did a crisis develop over cuba in 1962

    A profit that is made is the reward for their work. Capitalism also follows the belief of opportunity for all and average standard of living higher then under communism, but a wide spread between rich and poor. America also had a free economy, Americans had a choice of many parties for government, which would be chosen by the people democratically.

  2. The case-study which I have chosen to analyse in terms of problem solving and ...

    Moreover, NATO would perhaps be affected, and the chances that the United States would successfully create a multilateral nuclear force would be reduced. Added to this was the potential that other Castros could be 'created' or at least encouraged. At the very least, American power would be less impressive and

  1. The Cuban Missile Crisis was the most serious U.S.-Soviet confrontation of the Cold War

    Cuba, however absolute proof of these medium-range ballistic missiles did not become available until the examination of photographs taken on October 14 was completed on the following day. Schaller states that the photographs taken by a U-2 spy plane "showed the construction fifteen miles south of Havana of a launching

  2. Free essay

    The Cold War did not become fully global until after the Cuban Missile Crisis ...

    Russian spies got the information on how to create the bomb and Russia soon had it after. The US and Russia started having an arms race to create the first hydrogen bond, which the US got first then the USSR one year later.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work