• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What different tactics were used by both sides in an attempt to win the conflict in Vietnam between 1956 and 1968?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Kirsty Singleton 11MG Assignment 2, Question 2 What different tactics were used by both sides in an attempt to win the conflict in Vietnam between 1956 and 1968? The tactics used by both of these countries were very different, but then the countries themselves were very different too. Here was America, super-power of the world, entering into a war with Vietnam, a small part of Asia, whose technologies and lifestyle were primitive. The Americans began the war because of an over-reactive paranoia to the spread of communism. So they sent in 'advisors' whose aim was to train up the south, and ensure that communism could not take a firm footing. This was the start of the war. The North Vietnamese, the Vietcong, infiltrated the country side, mixed and blended with the peasants, and virtually became invisible. The Americans came along, with their uniforms and guns, and suddenly realised they had virtually no way of telling who was the enemy, and who was not. ...read more.

Middle

It was not expected, and neither were traps such as the 'Bouncing Betty', the tin can trap and the fuel tank trap. All involved serious injuries such of loss of limbs, or death. Bombing raids were continued, but the Vietnamese had been provided with more up to date technology by the Russians, who of course sympathised with the Communist wannabes. They had the Surface to Air missiles (SAM), but these were detected by the American's radar's, and they also had the technology to log onto SAM and destroy it. The Vietnamese also came into possession of Anti-aircraft guns, which were far more successful than the SAM, even though they were more primitive. Again, the Americans were too cocky to expect it. They were also supplied with the relatively up-to-date planes, the Soviet MIG-17 and the MIG-21PF Fighters, sot that the Vietnamese could finally take to the skies in their effort to defeat the Americans. ...read more.

Conclusion

Perhaps if the Americans had known the opinions of the NLF, they would have tried to coax another all out offensive, using it to pick off all those remaining in the NLF. The tactics used by the two sides in the war, were entirely different, yet it seems the primitive tactics of the NLF were the most successful. The U.S.'s bombing campaign was useless, the use of Napalm to uncover the Ho-Chi Minh trail was too, yet the Vietnamese who had managed to avoid these attacks quite effectively, used their own tactics and inspired fear into the hearts of American troops with their booby-traps and seeming invisibility. It leaves me in no two minds of whose tactics were the most successful, and it shows, as in the end, it was the Vietnam who really 'won' the war, because it was the Americans who called for a peace, and it was the Vietnamese who were calling the shots in the ensuing peace deal. That would not have happened, had the Americans tactics been more successful, would it? No. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. What different tactics were used by both sides in an attempt to win the ...

    Tunnels, used by the Vietnamese, were useful as they were multipurpose, able to avoid American soldiers, while also offering shelter during American bombing raids and providing transport of ammunitions and History GCSE Coursework Candidate Name: Anthony Skeete Candidate Number: 7104 Vietnam Post 1939 Assignment 2 What different tactics were used

  2. To what extent can it be argued that the use of guerilla warfare tactics ...

    Diem held very prejudice religious beliefs in a country made up mainly of Buddhist and was very unpopular for this and other reasons4. This totally goes against the democratic ideals that America holds so dear. With this evidence America appears to have been acting utterly hypocritically and for their own personal gain.

  1. Describe the tactics used by the U.S and the N.L.F in the Vietnam War. ...

    The war also had many psychological effects. The North Vietnamese used this as propaganda against the Americans, suggesting that they had done it deliberately to harm innocent people. But aside from this, the Americans were still struggling to have a clear view of the enemy. Because of this, they introduced another chemical bomb - Napalm.

  2. What Different Tactics Did Both Sides use in an Attempt to Win the Conflict ...

    The long air raids only raised the morale and tenacity of the Vietnamese to resist. The North Vietnamese used three main methods to combat this: * Anti-aircraft guns. Were very effective and shot down most of the U.S aircraft which crashed to the ground in North Vietnam. * Surface-to-air missiles.

  1. The Tactics used in Vietnam

    This meant hunting down and killing Vietnamese soldiers. The Vietcong used a similar tactic called 'find and kill'. Although this was the same as 'search and destroy' it was much more successful. One reason for this was that the American soldiers wore uniforms and were easier to identify.

  2. 'Generals win battles, resources win wars.' How far does your study of the period ...

    War contributed to the bloodshed, it was the ability of these industrialised nations to use their huge resources that determined the path of war. It can be argued, for example, that after the Americans declared war in April 1917 the allies' victory was (eventually)

  1. The Arab-Israeli conflict 1956, 1967 and 1973.

    Egypt, the USA decided to put its armed forces on nuclear alert and therefore, the suggestion was dropped as was the nuclear alert. This illustrates clearly how heavily involved the USSR was in the three wars. Nasser's personality also had a great impact on the Arab world and contributed a lot to the first two wars (1956 and 1967).

  2. Did the TET offensive (1968) impact the conflict in Vietnam

    According to an outside source, HistoryCentral, ?The Vietnam War was an important factor in bringing down the American Economy from the growth and affluence of the 1960s to the economic crisis in the 1970s?. Politicians and the public were worried that the USA could not manage to finance the war for much longer.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work