• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What different tactics were used by both sides in an attempt to win the conflict in Vietnam between 1956 and 1968?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Kirsty Singleton 11MG Assignment 2, Question 2 What different tactics were used by both sides in an attempt to win the conflict in Vietnam between 1956 and 1968? The tactics used by both of these countries were very different, but then the countries themselves were very different too. Here was America, super-power of the world, entering into a war with Vietnam, a small part of Asia, whose technologies and lifestyle were primitive. The Americans began the war because of an over-reactive paranoia to the spread of communism. So they sent in 'advisors' whose aim was to train up the south, and ensure that communism could not take a firm footing. This was the start of the war. The North Vietnamese, the Vietcong, infiltrated the country side, mixed and blended with the peasants, and virtually became invisible. The Americans came along, with their uniforms and guns, and suddenly realised they had virtually no way of telling who was the enemy, and who was not. ...read more.

Middle

It was not expected, and neither were traps such as the 'Bouncing Betty', the tin can trap and the fuel tank trap. All involved serious injuries such of loss of limbs, or death. Bombing raids were continued, but the Vietnamese had been provided with more up to date technology by the Russians, who of course sympathised with the Communist wannabes. They had the Surface to Air missiles (SAM), but these were detected by the American's radar's, and they also had the technology to log onto SAM and destroy it. The Vietnamese also came into possession of Anti-aircraft guns, which were far more successful than the SAM, even though they were more primitive. Again, the Americans were too cocky to expect it. They were also supplied with the relatively up-to-date planes, the Soviet MIG-17 and the MIG-21PF Fighters, sot that the Vietnamese could finally take to the skies in their effort to defeat the Americans. ...read more.

Conclusion

Perhaps if the Americans had known the opinions of the NLF, they would have tried to coax another all out offensive, using it to pick off all those remaining in the NLF. The tactics used by the two sides in the war, were entirely different, yet it seems the primitive tactics of the NLF were the most successful. The U.S.'s bombing campaign was useless, the use of Napalm to uncover the Ho-Chi Minh trail was too, yet the Vietnamese who had managed to avoid these attacks quite effectively, used their own tactics and inspired fear into the hearts of American troops with their booby-traps and seeming invisibility. It leaves me in no two minds of whose tactics were the most successful, and it shows, as in the end, it was the Vietnam who really 'won' the war, because it was the Americans who called for a peace, and it was the Vietnamese who were calling the shots in the ensuing peace deal. That would not have happened, had the Americans tactics been more successful, would it? No. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. “Generals Win Battles, Resources Win Wars”. How Far Does Your Study of the Period ...

    as they do an essential element in battle plans and the execution of military manoeuvres. Supply ships, horses, transportation vehicles - all are resources of as great an importance as the basics of food and weapons. In most cases, soldiers themselves are also a resource to be manipulated - it

  2. The Arab-Israeli conflict 1956, 1967 and 1973.

    Egypt, the USA decided to put its armed forces on nuclear alert and therefore, the suggestion was dropped as was the nuclear alert. This illustrates clearly how heavily involved the USSR was in the three wars. Nasser's personality also had a great impact on the Arab world and contributed a lot to the first two wars (1956 and 1967).

  1. 'Generals win battles, resources win wars.' How far does your study of the period ...

    his contemporaries-believed it Napoleon's ability that caused France to be the power it became in the first half of the nineteenth-century. Theirs (a major supporter) saw Napoleon as "the greatest human being since Caesar and Charlemagne". Even Clausewitz, who disliked Napoleon intensely, felt that it was Napoleon's leadership that enabled France to become a major central power.

  2. Why did the Communists win in 1949?

    > The people should be made more equal > The people should have more say in running their own lives and governing the country. > All these things should happen as soon as possible after the CCP come to power. When Sun-Yat-sen died in 1925, Chinag Kai-Shek came into power.

  1. The Tactics used in Vietnam

    Schools and hospitals were built. This policy was a success; many South Vietnamese remained in support of the Americans and were immune to the persuasive talk of communist infiltrators. However those who were already convinced as to the virtues of communism would not be swayed.

  2. What different tactics were used by both sides in an attempt to win the ...

    Tunnels, used by the Vietnamese, were useful as they were multipurpose, able to avoid American soldiers, while also offering shelter during American bombing raids and providing transport of ammunitions and History GCSE Coursework Candidate Name: Anthony Skeete Candidate Number: 7104 Vietnam Post 1939 Assignment 2 What different tactics were used

  1. What different tactics did both sides use in an attempt to win the conflict ...

    The United States Information Service (USIS) were aware that they were losing the propaganda war to the National Liberation Front (NLF). In 1962 the United States Information Service came up with the idea of designing a new name for the enemy as "Vietcong" wasn't suitable anymore.

  2. Did the TET offensive (1968) impact the conflict in Vietnam

    The media brought vivid scenes of what was going on, therefore the public began to become doubtful of the war. Thirdly, economically. In response to the TET offensive, the Americans devised a ?strategy? which outlined to ?stay with it and ultimately hope that the enemy will finally give up.? This

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work