• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What different tactics were used by both sides in an attempt to win the conflict in Vietnam between 1956 and 1968?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Kirsty Singleton 11MG Assignment 2, Question 2 What different tactics were used by both sides in an attempt to win the conflict in Vietnam between 1956 and 1968? The tactics used by both of these countries were very different, but then the countries themselves were very different too. Here was America, super-power of the world, entering into a war with Vietnam, a small part of Asia, whose technologies and lifestyle were primitive. The Americans began the war because of an over-reactive paranoia to the spread of communism. So they sent in 'advisors' whose aim was to train up the south, and ensure that communism could not take a firm footing. This was the start of the war. The North Vietnamese, the Vietcong, infiltrated the country side, mixed and blended with the peasants, and virtually became invisible. The Americans came along, with their uniforms and guns, and suddenly realised they had virtually no way of telling who was the enemy, and who was not. ...read more.

Middle

It was not expected, and neither were traps such as the 'Bouncing Betty', the tin can trap and the fuel tank trap. All involved serious injuries such of loss of limbs, or death. Bombing raids were continued, but the Vietnamese had been provided with more up to date technology by the Russians, who of course sympathised with the Communist wannabes. They had the Surface to Air missiles (SAM), but these were detected by the American's radar's, and they also had the technology to log onto SAM and destroy it. The Vietnamese also came into possession of Anti-aircraft guns, which were far more successful than the SAM, even though they were more primitive. Again, the Americans were too cocky to expect it. They were also supplied with the relatively up-to-date planes, the Soviet MIG-17 and the MIG-21PF Fighters, sot that the Vietnamese could finally take to the skies in their effort to defeat the Americans. ...read more.

Conclusion

Perhaps if the Americans had known the opinions of the NLF, they would have tried to coax another all out offensive, using it to pick off all those remaining in the NLF. The tactics used by the two sides in the war, were entirely different, yet it seems the primitive tactics of the NLF were the most successful. The U.S.'s bombing campaign was useless, the use of Napalm to uncover the Ho-Chi Minh trail was too, yet the Vietnamese who had managed to avoid these attacks quite effectively, used their own tactics and inspired fear into the hearts of American troops with their booby-traps and seeming invisibility. It leaves me in no two minds of whose tactics were the most successful, and it shows, as in the end, it was the Vietnam who really 'won' the war, because it was the Americans who called for a peace, and it was the Vietnamese who were calling the shots in the ensuing peace deal. That would not have happened, had the Americans tactics been more successful, would it? No. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. “Generals Win Battles, Resources Win Wars”. How Far Does Your Study of the Period ...

    as they do an essential element in battle plans and the execution of military manoeuvres. Supply ships, horses, transportation vehicles - all are resources of as great an importance as the basics of food and weapons. In most cases, soldiers themselves are also a resource to be manipulated - it

  2. Why did the Communists win in 1949?

    However,, when the GMD chasing the CCP went through, for example, the same village, it would not act in a similar way. They would kill, plunder, rape, and other crimes if they even thought they talked to the enemy. When people say the well behaved Red Army, and then saw

  1. The Arab-Israeli conflict 1956, 1967 and 1973.

    This was exactly what the USSR had wanted. Perhaps Russia was either truly misinformed about the attack or purposely lied to Syria so as to trigger off a war and prove to the USA that Russia indeed had a greater influence in the Arab world, or even maybe so as

  2. 'Generals win battles, resources win wars.' How far does your study of the period ...

    It was his offensive tactics, his work rate and his capacity to read the topography of a battlefield; along with his ability to win battles in which he was the underdog, which contributed to his perception as a 'Genius'. Though some modern historians have questioned this ability, most-including many of

  1. What different tactics were used by both sides in an attempt to win the ...

    Tunnels, used by the Vietnamese, were useful as they were multipurpose, able to avoid American soldiers, while also offering shelter during American bombing raids and providing transport of ammunitions and History GCSE Coursework Candidate Name: Anthony Skeete Candidate Number: 7104 Vietnam Post 1939 Assignment 2 What different tactics were used

  2. Describe the tactics used by the U.S and the N.L.F in the Vietnam War. ...

    One effect of this chemical was that it caused cancer amongst those who used it or were affected it. It also had an effect on pregnant woman who ended up giving birth to seriously deformed children or stillborns. The war also had many psychological effects.

  1. What Different Tactics Did Both Sides use in an Attempt to Win the Conflict ...

    to try to bring the Vietnamese to their knees and sign a peace treaty in 1966. The huge B-52 bombers, which flew at over 15,000 metres high were first used for this purpose and used three times as much tonnage of bombs on North Vietnam as the allies dropped on Germany in World War Two.

  2. Did the TET offensive (1968) impact the conflict in Vietnam

    The media brought vivid scenes of what was going on, therefore the public began to become doubtful of the war. Thirdly, economically. In response to the TET offensive, the Americans devised a ?strategy? which outlined to ?stay with it and ultimately hope that the enemy will finally give up.? This

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work